问题 问答题

案情

:2007年2月,甲乙丙丁戊五人共同出资设立北陵贸易有限责任公司(简称北陵公司)。公司章程规定:公司注册资本500万元;持股比例各20%;甲、乙各以100万元现金出资,丙以私有房屋出资,丁以专利权出资,戊以设备出资,各折价100万元;甲任董事长兼总经理,负责公司经营管理;公司前五年若有利润,甲得28%,其他四位股东各得18%,从第六年开始平均分配利润。
至2010年9月,丙的房屋仍未过户登记到公司名下,但事实上一直由公司占有和使用。
公司成立后一个月,丁提出急需资金,向公司借款100万元,公司为此召开临时股东会议,作出决议如下:同意借给丁100万元,借期六个月,每月利息一万元。丁向公司出具了借条。虽至今丁一直未归还借款,但每月均付给公司利息一万元。
千山公司总经理王五系甲好友,千山公司向建设银行借款1,000万元,借期一年,王五请求北陵公司提供担保。甲说:“公司章程规定我只有300万元的担保决定权,超过了要上股东会才行。”王五说:“你放心,我保证一年到期就归还银行,到时候与你公司无关,只是按银行要求做个手续。”甲碍于情面,自己决定以公司名义给千山公司的贷款银行出具了一份担保函。
戊不幸于2008年5月地震中遇难,其13岁的儿子幸存下来。
北陵公司欲向农业银行借款200万元,以设备作为担保,银行同意,双方签订了借款合同和抵押合同,但未办理抵押登记。
2010年5月,乙提出欲将其股份全部转让给甲,甲愿意受让。
2010年7月,当地发生洪水灾害,此时北陵公司的净资产为120万元,但尚欠万水公司债务150万元一直未还。北陵公司决定向当地的一家慈善机构捐款100万元,与其签订了捐赠合同,但尚未交付。

问题:


乙向甲转让股份时,其他股东是否享有优先受让权为什么

答案

参考答案:不享有。因为不是对外转让。

解析: 有限责任公司的股权转让
此处应将“股份”改为“股权”。《公司法》第72条规定:“有限责任公司的股东之间可以相互转让其全部或者部分股权。股东向股东以外的人转让股权,应当经其他股东过半数同意。股东应就其股权转让事项书面通知其他股东征求同意,其他股东自接到书面通知之日起满三十日未答复的,视为同意转让。其他股东半数以上不同意转让的,不同意的股东应当购买该转让的股权;不购买的,视为同意转让。经股东同意转让的股权,在同等条件下,其他股东有优先购买权。两个以上股东主张行使优先购买权的,协商确定各自的购买比例;协商不成的,按照转让时各自的出资比例行使优先购买权。公司章程对股权转让另有规定的,从其规定。”可见,乙向股东甲转让股权属于股东之间的内部转让股权,不是对外转让,故不需经其他股东同意,其他股东也不享有优先受让权。

单项选择题
单项选择题

When it comes to suing doctors, Philadelphia is hardly the city of brotherly love. A combination of sprightly lawyers and sympathetic juries has made Philadelphia a hotspot for medical-malpractice lawsuits. Since 1995, Pennsylvania state courts have awarded an average of $ 2m in such cases, according to Jury Verdict Research, a survey firm. Some medical specialists have seen their malpractice insurance premiums nearly double over the past year. Obstetricians are now paying up to $104,000 a year to protect themselves.

The insurance industry is largely to blame. Carol Golin, the Monitor’s editor, argues that in the 1990s insurers tried to grab market share by offering artificially low rates (betting that any losses would be covered by gains on their investments). The stock-market correction, coupled with the large legal awards, has eroded the insurers’ reserves. Three in Pennsylvania alone have gone bust.

A few doctors--particularly older ones--will quit. The rest are adapting. Some are abandoning litigation-prone procedures, such as delivering babies. Others are moving parts of their practice to neighboring states where insurance rates are lower. Some from Pennsylvania have opened offices in New Jersey. New doctors may also be deterred from setting up shop in litigation havens, however prestigious.

Despite a Republican president, tort reform has got nowhere at the federal level. Indeed doctors could get clobbered indirectly by a Patients’ Bill of Rights, which would further expose managed care companies to lawsuits. This prospect has fuelled interest among doctors in Pennsylvania’s new medical malpractice reform bill, which was signed into law on March 20th. It will, among other things, give doctors $ 40m of state funds to offset their insurance premiums, spread the payment of awards out over time and prohibit individuals from double dipping--that is, suing a doctor for damages that have already been paid by their health insurer.

But will it really help Randall Bovbjerg, a health policy expert at the Urban Institute, argues that the only proper way to slow down the litigation machine would be to limit the compensation for pain and suffering, so-called "non-monetary damages". Needless to say, a fixed cap on such awards is resisted by most trial lawyers. But Mr Bovbjerg reckons a more nuanced approach, with a sliding scale of payments based on well-defined measures of injury, is a better way forward. In the meantime, doctors and insurers are bracing themselves for a couple more rough years before the insurance cycle turns.

Nobody disputes that hospital staff make mistakes: a 1999 Institute of Medicine report claimed that errors kill at least 44,000 patients a year. But there is little evidence that malpractice lawsuits on their own will solve the problem.

According to the text, what encourages doctors and insurers is that()

A. a new reform bill is coming into force

B. insurance premiums could be balanced

C. new medical offices have been opened up

D. injuries will be precisely measured