问题 不定项选择

下述说法,对邮寄送达理解错误的是:()

A.邮政机构按照当事人提供的送达地址在5日内投送3次以上未能送达,应将邮件在规定的日期内退回人民法院,并说明退回的理由。

B.受送达人同住的成年亲属签收的,即为送达

C.受送达人及其代收人拒绝签收的,邮递员在说明情况后,可以适用留置送达

D.因受送达人送达地址变更未及时告知人民法院,导致诉讼文书未能被受送达人接受的,文书退回之日视为送达之日

答案

参考答案:A,C

解析:《以法院专递方式邮寄送达民事诉讼文书的若干规定》第6条第2款规定:"邮政机构按照当事人提供或确认的送达地址在五日内投送三次以上未能送达,通过电话或者其他联系方式又无法告知受送达人的,应当将邮件在规定的日期内退回人民法院,并说明退回的理由。"所以选项A错误。   第9条规定:"有下列情形之一的,即为送达:(一)受送达人在邮件回执上签名、盖章或者捺印的;(二)受送达人是无民事行为能力或者限制民事行为能力的自然人,其法定代理人签收的;(三)受送达人是法人或者其他组织,其法人的法定代表人、该组织的主要负责人或者办公室、收发室、值班室的工作人员签收的;(四)受送达人的诉讼代理人签收的; (五)受送达人指定的代收人签收的; (六)受送达人的同住成年家属签收的。"所以选项B正确。   第8条第2款规定:"受送达人及其代收人在签收时应当出示其有效身份证件并在回执上填写该证件的号码;受送达人及其代收人拒绝签收的,由邮政机构的投递员记明情况后将邮件退回人民法院。"所以选项C错误。   第11条第1款规定:"因受送达人自己提供或者确认的送达地址不准确、拒不提供送达地址、送达地址变更未及时告知人民法院、受送达人本人或者受送达人指定的代收人拒绝签收,导致诉讼文书未能被受送达人实际接收的,文书退回之日视为送达之日。"所以选项D正确。

多项选择题
问答题

The potential of computers for increasing the control of organizations or society over their members and for invading the privacy of those members has caused considerable concern.
The privacy issue has been raised most insistently with respect to the creation and maintenance of data files that assemble information about persons from a multitude of sources. Files of this kind would be highly valuable for many kinds of economic and social research, but they are bought at too high a price if they endanger human freedom or seriously enhance the opportunities of blackmailers. (2) While such dangers should not be ignored, it should be noted that the lack of comprehensive data files has never before been the limiting barrier to the suppression of human freedom.
Making the computer the villain in the invasion of privacy or encroachment on civil liberties simply diverts attention from the real dangers. Computer data banks can and must be given the highest degree of protection from abuse. (3) But we must be careful, also, that we do not employ such crude methods of protection as to deprive our society of important data it needs to understand its own social processes and to analyze its problems.
Perhaps the most important question of all about the computer is what it has done and will do to man’s view of himself and his place in the universe. (4) The most heated attacks on the computer are not focused on its possible economic effects, its presumed destruction of job satisfaction, or its threat to privacy and liberty, but upon the claim that it causes people to be viewed, and to view themselves, as ’machines’.
What the computer and the progress in artificial intelligence challenge is an ethic that rests on man’s apartness from the rest of nature. An alternative ethic, of course, views man as a part of nature, governed by natural law, subject to the forces of gravity and the demands of his body. (5) The debate about artificial intelligence and the simulation of man’s thinking is, in considerable part, a confrontation of these two views of man’s place in the universe.