问题 判断题

设计调查方案的首要问题是确定调查对象。

答案

参考答案:

解析:制定统计调查方案的首要问题是明确调查的任务和目的。

阅读理解与欣赏

题目                             

       ①做医生的邻居跟我讲了个事儿:他的一个病人,挺年轻的姑娘,患了干燥综合症。这是一种很罕见的病,就是身体分泌的那些汗液、胃液和唾液都越来越少,导致人消化困难,必须借助专门的导管将类似胃酸的物质输入体内,才能稍稍缓解;更残忍的,这种病人不能见阳光。阳光就像一台榨汁机,会很快耗完病人的体液,就像在榨取一个鲜嫩的苹果,导致病人呼吸衰竭。现在的医术还无法彻底治疗这种病症,在谨慎地反复会诊之后,他们诊断,这个姑娘最多还能再活10个月。

       ②姑娘的病房,窗帘是日夜拉上的,只有镍灯发出淡淡的冷光。只有月光很暗淡的夜晚,病人才可以在护士的陪同下到院子里散步。

       ③医生说,他从没见过那么苍白的脸,却也从没见过那样明亮的眼神。每次他进去的时候,都看见那个姑娘在专心致志地涂指甲油,鲜艳通红的那种,和她的苍白正好形成鲜明的对比。

       ④两个多月后,我在网上看到一份资料,说国外有个患干燥症的病人,生活在避免阳光直射的环境里,活了3年之久,希望这则消息可以使这个姑娘宽慰一些,我打印下来,去找那个医生。

       ⑤医生听清来意,摇摇头,说没有用了,她已经去了。看着我惊讶的样子,医生叹口气:“她突然坚持去天山旅行,我们通知了她的父母,但谁也劝不住。后来听说她根本没爬上去,只是在天山脚下的草原骑马,病情当场发作,救治无效,就没了。挺可惜的,才22岁,听说恋爱都没谈过……”

       ⑥身患绝症的年轻女孩,让自己的生命提前在明媚的阳光下凋谢,该有着怎样的勇气和决心?

       ⑦医生又说,她和你一样,喜欢读书写东西,在整理病人遗物的时候,整理出来一大堆各种颜色的指甲油,每种颜色外面都贴了张小纸条,是她自己给那些指甲油起的名字。其中,淡蓝色的,叫做“豆蔻”;银色的,叫做“妖精”;而大红的那支,她起了一个很古典的名字,叫做“与子偕老”。听得我心酸。

       ⑧阳光和生命相比,当然生命重要。但在某些关键时刻,阳光显得那样不可缺少、不可替代,甚至用生命去换取也心甘情愿。

       ⑨她鲜红的指甲油,也许一直是她心底下鲜红的太阳。可是,她不能舍弃的,不仅仅是一种可以检测生命硬度和质量的阳光,还有尘世每日升起的太阳。

       ⑩我们健康人每天都能看到、触摸到阳光,就像看到、触摸到很多其他美好的事物一样。只是在通常情况下,我们选择了疏忽,而非珍视。(选自《读者》2005年第14期 作者:邢汶)

1.下面三项中,你认为哪一项最适合做文章的标题?[ ]

A、《生命啊,生命》 

B、《阳光啊,阳光》  

C、《阳光与生命》

2.作者善于运用一些修饰语来传情达意。例如:(1)用“                    ”来修饰姑娘的脸,说明                               ;(2)用“                        ”来修饰阳光,借此来比喻                                   

3.文中多次提到姑娘用的指甲油,由指甲油我们可以联想到姑娘                                        的精神面貌。

4.第⑨段画线句中,你认为“生命的硬度”是指                                  ,“生命的质量”是指

                                               。

5.对于阳光、空气、水等我们日常生活中的一些司空见惯的事物,我们健康的人常常会熟视无睹地“疏忽”它们的存在。读了本文后,你认为我们应该怎样“珍视”它们?为什么?

                                                                                                                                                             

                                                                                                                                                            

阅读理解

After the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill aimed at retaliatory(报复的) action against China for its “significantly undervalued” currency, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner urged the IMF to pressure China to adopt “more flexible, more market-directed exchange-rate management”. This is a coded message to China: You’re keeping on purpose your currency cheap, and the U.S. economy is paying the price. So cut it out --- or else. The normally dull IMF meeting became the latest battleground for the U.S. to be against a fast developing China.

Our new conventional wisdom is that China’s policy leads to make trade deficits (逆差) greater and the loss of American jobs. Dozens of candidates have run ads attacking a competitor for allowing China to take advantage of us. In the election-year view, China grew 10% annually for the past decade while maintaining low inflation(通涨) only by taking advantage of its artificially low currency. The idea that the U.S. is not responsible for its own economy is a black-is-white view. It argues that China and its currency are causing the lion’s share of harm.

This is an argument born of fear. It covers a fact that the economies of China and the U.S. have become beneficial to each other. Those trillions in reserves that China accumulates: Where do they go? Back to the U.S. in the form of lending money to the federal government. Those made-in-China goods that account for the trade deficit: Whom do they benefit? China, yes, but also American consumers and companies. Without China, American companies could not have maintained their profitability in recent years. Take two brand names, Caterpillar and Nike. Both have their products made in China, but both also view China as a fast-growing market for their products.

George Soros warned recently that a currency war could put the world into disorder more damaging than anything caused by the financial crisis of the 1930s. He’s right. Whether we like it or not, we live in a global system. The zero-sum attitude toward China and its currency is a relic, the remaining of an earlier time when nations defined economic life.

China is far from perfect and seeks its own advantage, but holding it accountable for our domestic problems is beyond outdated. It reflects a dangerous refusal to deal with the world as it is. Retaliating against China over currency will not regain high-end jobs in the U.S., which needs more our own demand. It will not renew construction or retool the American labor force. It will not rebuild rotting bridges or create a next-generation energy network.

小题1:Which of the following argument can be supported by the writer?

A.China is the winner in the Sino-US trade.

B.China’s rapid development over the past ten years is based on its low inflation.

C.The world’s economy will benefit from China’s policy changes on its currency.

D.The US will get hurt if it tries hard on damaging China’s economy.小题2:This passage is in a tone that is ____________.

A.in favor of China

B.in the shoes of US

C.blaming China’s low currency policy

D.helping IMF solve the world’s economic problem小题3:The writer makes his point of view clear through the passage by using _____________.

A.reasonable analysis

B.leaders’ quotations

C.figure examples

D.moving stories小题4:China’s currency policy ________.

A.will help increase the demand in the US

B.is unable to equip the American labor force with new working skills

C.could guide the world economy for the next decade

D.is to be controlled by the international currency groups