林武取得一张北京大同有限公司开出的可背书转让汇票，该票据承兑行是上海虹口区工商银行。林武到青岛出差时不慎将该汇票丢失，立即向法院申请公示催告。法院经审查后发出催告，公告期为70天。到第80天，仍无人申请权利，该法院于是判决除去原票据上的权利，终结公示催告程序。关于本案的叙述，错误的有________。

A．林武应当向上海虹口区人民法院申请公示催告

B．本案公示催告的时间超过了民事诉讼法规定的60日，因此期间违法

C．本案中林武应在催告期间届满后一个月内向上海虹口区人民法院申请除权判决

D．本案中法院不待当事人申请，自行作出除权判决的做法是错误的

Questions 10—11 are based on the following:
Antinuclear activist: The closing of the nuclear power plant is a victory for the antinuclear cause. It also represents a belated acknowledgment by the power industry that they cannot operate such plants safely.
Nuclear power plant manager: It represents no such thing. The availability of cheap power from nonnuclear sources, together with the cost of mandated safety inspections and safety repairs, made continued operation uneconomic. Thus it was not safety considerations but economic considerations that dictated the plant’s closing.

The reasoning in the manger’s argument is flawed because the argument

A．fails to acknowledge that the power industry might now believe nuclear power plants to be unsafe even though this plant was not closed for safety reasons

B．overlooks the possibility that the sources from which cheap power is available might themselves be subject to safety concerns

C．mistakes the issue of what the closure of the plant represents to the public for the issue of what the managers’ reasons for the closure were

D．takes as one of its premises a view about the power industry’s attitude toward nuclear safety that contradicts the activist’s view

E．(E) counts as purely economic considerations some expenses that arise as a result of the need to take safety precautions