根据《民法通则》的规定，从事高度危险作业致人损害的侵权行为，在责任的承担上哪些表述是正确的
A．其归责原则为无过错责任原则
B．在致害人无过错时，可适当减轻民事责任
C．如果证明损害是受害人故意造成的，致害人不承担责任
D．除非致害人能证明自己无过失，否则致害人都应承担责任
参考答案：A,C
解析：[考点] 高度危险作业致人损害的侵权行为
依据《民法通则》第123条的规定，高度危险作业致人损害的侵权行为责任的归责原则是无过错责任，故选择A项排除D项；关于其免责事由，仅仅包括受害人的故意，故选择c项排除B项。
| 完形填空。 | ||||
| When I was about 13, my father would take me on short outings on Saturdays. On the way home, Dad 1 stopped at the Dairy Queen for 10-cent ice creams. I couldn't 2 it, but I could pray from the 3 we started heading home to that corner where we would either go straight for the ice cream or 4 and go home empty-handed. That corner 5 either mouth-watering excitement or 6 . One day, we were heading home, and again I was praying for the 7 sound of his offer. It 8 . "Would you like an ice cream today?" "That sounds great, Dad!" But then he said, "Would you like to 9 today?" "Twenty cents!" I thought to myself, "I can afford it. I got 25 cents' pocket money and some 10 for odd jobs (零活). Well, 11 it is enough, ice cream isn't a good use of it." 12 , I said, "Well, in that case, I guess I'll 13 ." My father just said, "Okay, Son." But as we headed home, I realized how wrong I was and begged him to 14 . But he just said, "That's okay, we don't really need one." I felt 15 for my selfishness and ungratefulness. He didn't mind, or 16 act disappointed. From that I 17 generosity (慷慨) goes two ways and gratefulness (感谢) sometimes costs more than "thank you". On that day gratefulness would have cost 20 cents and it would have been the 18 ice cream I'd ever had. I'll tell you one more thing. We 19 another trip the next week. As we 20 the corner, I said, "Dad, would you like an ice cream today? My treat." | ||||
|
