问题 阅读理解
阅读理解。
        When Christie Andrews was born, she weighed less that half of one kilogram. Her heart was the size
of a large coin. Her mother said Christie was so small that she could hold her in the palm of one hand.
        Christie couldn't breathe without a machine to give her oxygen. If she had been born 20 years earlier,
she would probable have died at once. She needed two operations, but she survived without serious damage.
        Twenty years ago, 90% of all premature (早产) babies died. Today, doctors manage to save four out
of every five, because they have better machines for breathing and better ways to feed the babies.
        But saving Christie's life cost more than 400,000. In some cases, doctors spend 1 million saving a
single child. The parents usually don't have enough money to pay. Either the government, an insurance
company or the hospital picks up (支付) the bill. 
       Even after a baby goes home from the hospital, it may require medical care.
       Some people think it makes more sense (更合乎逻辑) to spend money saving 10 adults who have
cancer or other diseases than saving one small baby. But nobody wants to be the doctor who has to tell
parents to their faces, " Sorry, I won't save your new child."
1. The main idea of the article is            .
[ ]
A. doctors must never decide whether to save babies or cancer patients
B. doctors are able to save premature babies, but the cost is very high
C. having a premature baby was cheaper and safer 20 years ago
D. Christie survived because the hospital paid her bills
2. Parents don't pay their babies' hospital bills because             .
[ ]
A. they don't have enough money
B. they would rather save cancer patients
C. doctors don't care if the babies die
D. it makes more sense to have a bigger baby
3. The true cost of saving a baby may be even more than 1 million because             .
[ ]
A. oxygen machine are expensive
B. the baby may require medical care after it leaves the hospital
C. doctors always charge more than they should
D. four out of five premature babies can now be saved
4. From the story we know that saving a cancer patient             .
[ ]
A. is easier than saving a baby
B. is harder than saving a baby
C. is cheaper than saving a baby
D. is more common than saving a baby
答案

1-4: B A B C

单项选择题
问答题

某工程项目,已完成施工招标前的各项准备工作,某监理单位受业主委托制定了评标方法与原则。确定评标采用加权综合评分法,评分的方法及原则如下:
1.加权综合评分从以下三个方面加以评价,并根据工程特点和具体情况分析赋予不同的权重。
(1)“投标报价”占50%;
(2)“施工企业的业绩和信誉”占30%;
(3)“企业的施工及管理能力”占20%。
2.“投标报价”方面的评分按满分100分计。具体评分时从以下三个方面评价,并各占不同权重的分值。
(1)报价偏差——满分为60分(即占60%权重),根据投标人所报标价与标底(本工程项目标底为1000万元)的偏差的正、负和大小按表1-3标准打分。

表1-3 报价偏差

报价偏差 -5%~3% -2%~-1% 1%~2% 3%~5%
得分 40 60 50 30
(2)报价费用组成的合理性——满分为30分(即占30%权重)。(3)三材用量的合理性——满分为10分(即占10%权重)。3.“企业的业绩与信誉”方面的评分按满分100分计,具体评分时按以下五个方面分别评价,其各自占有的权重如表1.4所示。

表1-4 “企业业绩与信誉”评分表

评价项目 资质等级 企业信誉 施工经历 近5年的
质量回访
近3年工程
质量、安全事故
合计
权重(或满分) 30%(30分) 20%(20分) 20%(20分) 15%(15分) 15%(15分) 100%(100分)
4.“企业的施工与管理能力”方面的评分按满分100分计,具体评分时按以下三个方面分别评价,其各自占有的权重如表1-5所示。
评价项目 对施工机械、
劳力的安排
安全管理 质量体系 合计
权重(或满分) 50%(50分) 30%(30分) 20%(20分) 100%(100分)
发布施工招标的公告后,共有14家施工企业申请投标,经过资格预审,有5家企业未通过资格审查,故只有9家施工企业参加投标。另外,在投标的9家企业中,有3家在开标及评标时被发现其投标文件不符合要求而被撤销,最后只余下6家施工企业的标书参与评标。这6家企业的报价分别如表1-6所示。
施工企业 A B C D E F
报价(万元) 1020 980 1010 960 1050 950
5.综合评价的满分为300分,三个方面的满分均为100分,三个方面的最低合计分均不得低于60分。
[问题]

评标组根据各企业投标情况及企业情况,对各个评价项目进行评定打分的结果如表1-7所示,请按综合评分法对各投标企业进行综合评分,计算各家企业的综合得分。