问题 阅读理解

阅读理解。

     Some people may think too much sunlight can lead to cancer, so they always keep themselves away

from sunlight. But experts believe that proper exposure (暴露) to sunlight is good for us.

     For example, scientists think sunlight can help stop some diseases. They say that wearing sunscreen

(防晒油) all the time makes the body short of vitamin D.

     Vitamin D in fact stops us from more than 25 diseases and keeps bones and teeth healthy. However,

around 60% of the population are short of vitamin D in their blood. One of the easiest ways to get it is to

expose your skin to sunlight. Your body makes vitamin D from the sun faster than it takes in from food.

What's more, safely getting enough sunlight can make you look younger.

     However, not everybody likes sunlight. Some people should not be exposed to the sun without a strong

sun protection. Experts advise that just ten minutes of daily exposure to sunlight should be enough to give

us vitamin D we need.

1. What does the passage mainly tell us?

A. Don't expose to the sun.

B. Proper exposure to sunlight is good for our health.

C. We should stay in the sun as long as possible.

D. We can get vitamin D from food.

2. What will happen if we don't get enough sunlight for a long time? 

A. We will keep away from cancer.

B. We will get many diseases.

C. Our body will be short of vitamin D.

D. We will have more vitamin D in our blood.

3. The proper sunshine can keep our _______ healthy.

A. eyes and skin

B. bones and teeth

C. ears and blood

D. bones and eyes

4. The underlined phrase"take in" in the passage means "_______" in Chinese.

A. 吸收

B. 占用

C. 分享

D. 拿进来

5. Which is NOT true according to the passage? 

A. Scientists think our skin can get vitamin D from sunlight.

B. Most people have enough vitamin D in their blood.

C. Ten minutes of exposure to sunlight every day is enough for us to get vitamin D.

D. Our body gets vitamin D faster from the sun than from food.

答案

1-5  BCBAB

问答题 简答题
单项选择题

Freudian theory indeed took western 20th-century civilization by storm. How so The answer lies in four factors.
Of Freud’s powers as a writer and advocate of ideas, and as a possessor of an extraordinary ability to weave together medical knowledge, some genuine insights into the human condition and a powerful imagination, there can be no question. He has the narrative skills of a first-rate novelist, and a knack for devising striking ways to describe the psychological phenomena he studies. His marvelous powers of imagination fed on analogy and metaphor, and annexed the austere terminologies of scientific medicine and psychology to them. This gave them authority. His case studies are highly organized narratives constructed from true-life gossip based on voyeurism—irresistible to human curiosity.
The second attraction—that Freud offers each individual a revelation of secrets about himself that he does not himself know—is equally irresistible. The same compound of insecurity and curiosity, anxiety and desire that makes so many resort against their better judgment to fortune-tellers, is at work here; except that here the imprimatur of science makes the proceeding respectable, which is why people will spend far more on their analysts than on their astrologers.
The third attraction is the promised theory of human nature. Religious accounts of fallen man, of humanity as midway between beast and angel, of imperishable souls trapped in disgusting matter and therefore sinful from birth, had lost their grip with many, while at the same time Darwinian views offered no account of why evolution had made man as he is.
In identifying sexual and aggressive impulses as the fundamental human drives, and in specifying their causes, Freud offered an inclusive philosophical psychology. Humans struggle with conceptual bewilderments about themselves and their complex natures; one can see why the appearance of Freud’s magisterial new insights seemed as welcome as rain in drought.
And finally there is the fact that sex lies at. the core of the stow. Freud performed a great service by liberating debate on the matter, but it is questionable whether the importance he assigns it is correct. The hungry always think of food; the fed put eating in its proper place. The accidents of social history are easily mistaken for the essentials of human nature. The surprise is that people do not see how, at most, sex can only be part of a far more complicated story.
From Animism to Zoroastrianism, every view known to man retains at least a few devotees. There might always be Freudians, and there will always be admirers of Freud’s great imaginative and literary powers; these two, as the foregoing remarks suggest, are intimately linked. But as to Freud’s claims upon troth, the judgment of time seems to be running against him.

The author believes that Freud’s power of imagination ______ .

A.is based on his writing techniques

B.stems from analogy and metaphor

C.is related to his writing skills and living background

D.has much to do with his austere terminologies