问题 阅读理解与欣赏

阅读下面文章,回答下列小题。

人,又少了一个

聂华苓(台湾)

三年前,也是冬天,一个骨瘦如柴的女人来到我家门前。

他头发蓬乱,脸色苍黄,穿着一件空荡荡的破旧花棉袄,一条褪色的灰布裤子,手中提着一个白布口袋。她轻轻地推开我家虚掩的大门,缩缩瑟瑟地探进头来,我正站在窗口。

“太太,我不是叫花子,我只是要点米,我的孩子饿得直哭?”她没等我回答,就自我介绍下去:“我也是大学毕业的。哪,你看。”她抖着手由内衣口袋中掏出身分证来,“这上面都写着呢,这是我以前的照片!”

由于好奇,我接过她的身份证。那是一个富态的中年女子的照片:光亮细碎的发卷,整整齐齐地贴在头上,淡淡的双眉,弯在那一双满足的眼睛之上,衣襟上还盘着一个蝴蝶花扣。

我端详着那照片的时候,她就一个人絮絮叨叨地讲了下去:“我先生坐了牢,我就一个人带着四个孩子,饱一天,饿一天。我替人洗衣服,付了房钱,喝稀饭都不够!孩子们饿得抱着我哭,我只有厚着脸皮出来讨点米。我只要米,不要钱,我不是叫花子,我是凭一双手吃饭的人!太太!唉!我真不好意思,我开不了口,我走了好几家,都说不出口!又退出来了!我怎么到了这一天!”她撩起衣角来拭眼泪。

我将她的口袋装满一袋米。她抖动着两片龟裂的嘴唇说道:“这怎么好意思?您给我这么多!这怎么好意思!谢谢,太太,我不晓得怎么说才好,我——我直想哭!”她淌着泪背着一袋米走了。

三年后的今天,我又看见了那个女人。她正站在巷口一家人家门前,我打那儿经过。她皱缩得更干更小了!佝偻着背,靠在门框上,脸上已经没有三年前那种羞怯的神情了,咧着一嘴黄牙,阴森森地笑着,用一种熟练的乞讨声调高声叫道:“太太,做做好事,赏一点吧!太太,做做好事,赏一点吧!”只听得门内“当啷”一响,是金属落地的声音,接着是一声吆喝:“一角钱拿去!走,走,谁叫你进来的?你这个女人,原来还自己洗衣服赚钱,现在连衣服也不洗了,还是讨来的方便!”

那女人笑嘻嘻的:“再赏一点吧,太太,一角钱买个烧饼都不够!”“咦,哪有讨饭的还讨价还价的?走,走,在这里哼哼唧唧的,成什么样子?”那女人的嘴笑得更开了:“再给我一点就走,免得我把您家地方站脏了,再多给一点!”

“砰”的一声,大门被踢上了。那女人回过头来,冷笑了一声,然后漠然望了我一眼,她已经不认得我了!

小题1:中年女人两次流泪的原因有什么不同,表现了她什么方面的特点?

小题2:有人认为本文第四段似乎可以删去,说说你的看法。

小题3:骨瘦如柴的女人明明活着,怎么说又少了一个呢?

小题4:下面对本文的赏析,正确的两项是( )(4分)

A.小说中作者未加任何评论与分析,只是用白描的手法记叙了事件的经过;收尾时,更是以不加修饰的自然结尾,给读者留下了无限的思考余地,令人回味无穷。

B.作者综合运用了肖像、神态、语言、动作和心理描写来细致传神地刻画人物形象,从而深刻揭露了当时的台湾社会中人民的悲惨境地。

C.作者运用强烈的对比手法,通过写乞讨者三年前后不同的神态,表现了人格的自我堕落这一深刻的主题,发人深思。

D.本文中中年女人的命运和祥林嫂的命运有极其相似的地方,两文的作者也不约而同的把批判的矛头指向了黑暗的社会现实。E、文中的“我”就是作者自己,本文正是通过写作者的所见所闻来反映当时台湾的社会现实。

答案

小题1:

小题1:

小题1:

小题1:

实验题
单项选择题

Passage Two


Ask someone what they have done to help the environment recently and they will almost certainly mention recycling. Recycling in the home is very important of course. However, being forced to recycle often means we already have more material than we need. We are dealing with the results of that overconsumption in the greenest way possible, but it would be far better if we did not need to bring so much material home in the first place.
The total amount of packaging increased by 12% between 1999 and 2005. It now makes up a third of a typical household’s waste in the UK. In many supermarkets nowadays food items are packaged twice with plastic and cardboard.
Too much packaging is doing serious damage to the environment. The UK, for example, is running out of it for carrying this unnecessary waste. If such packaging is burnt, it gives off greenhouse gases which go on to cause the greenhouse effect. Recycling helps, but the process itself uses energy. The solution is not to produce such items in the first place. Food waste is a serious problem, too. Too many supermarkets encourage customers to buy more than they need. However, a few of them are coming round to the idea that this cannot continue, encouraging customers to reuse their plastic bags, for example.
But this is not just about supermarkets. It is about all of us. We have learned to associate packaging with quality. We have learned to think that something unpackaged is of poor quality. This is especially true of food. But it is also applied to a wide range of consumer products, which often have far more packaging than necessary.
There are signs of hope. As more Of us recycle, we are beginning to realize just how much unnecessary materials are collecting. We need to face the wastefulness of our consumer culture, but we have a mountain to climb.

What can be inferred from Paragraph 4

A.Unpackaged products are of bad quality.

B.Supermarkets care more about packaging.

C.It is improper to judge quality by packaging,

D.Other products are better packaged than foo