问题 选择题

经济学家康德拉捷夫认为:资本主义经济发展过程中存在着周期为50年左右的景气与萧条交替的长期波动。在每一个周期,都会出现一个或几个新兴的经济强国,利用当时出现的种种机遇,充当世界经济新的“增长极”。1945年前后,美国充当“增长极”的措施不包括

A.通过布雷顿森林体系,加强美国在世界金融的支配地位

B.推行马歇尔计划,加强对西欧的控制

C.参加关税与贸易总协定,拓展了美国的海外市场

D.成立北美自由贸易区,主导区域经济

答案

答案:D

题目分析:分析题干,首先叙述了每个周期中都有一个或几个强国主导世界经济的增长,从而实际上考查美国在1945年经济增长的原因,分析各个选项,联系所学史实,只有D项不符合题干时间要求,因为北美自由贸易区是在1994年正式诞生的,与1945年没有关系,答案为D。

点评:此题难度不大,实际上是考查二战后世界经济尤其是美国经济发展的具体情况,主要考查学生的知识迁移能力。

选择题
单项选择题

If American investors have learned any lesson in the last 25 years, it is to buy shares on the dips. The slide in 2000--2002 may have been longer and deeper than they were used to but normal service was eventually resumed, driving the Dow Jones Industrial Average to a record high on October 1st.

Among American financial commentators, it is almost universally accepted that shares always rise over the long run. And one ought to expect shares (which are risky) to deliver a higher return than risk free assets such as government bonds.

Nevertheless, investors ought also to remember the world’s second largest economy, Japan. Its most popular stock-market average, the Nikkei 225, peaked at 38,915 on the last trading day of the 1980s; this week, nearly 18 years later, it is still only around 17,000, less than half its peak. Buying on the dips did not work either.

Professionals of the London Business School examined the record of 16 stock markets which were in continuous operation over the course of the 20th century. In itself, this selection showed survivorship bias by excluding the likes of Russia and China. The academies found that only three other countries could match the American record of having no 20-year periods with negative real returns.

Other investors were far less lucky. Japanese, French, German and Spanish investors all suffered instances where they had to wait 50--60 years to earn a positive real return. It was no good following the famous advice to "put the shares in a drawer and forget about them"; the furniture would not have lasted that long.

Besides survivorship bias, there is another problem with the belief that stock markets must always go up. Investors will keep buying until prices reach stratospheric(稳定的) levels. That clearly happened in Japan in the late 1980s, and after seven years, it is still not much more than half its peak level.

A significant proportion of the return from equities in the second half of the 20th century came from a re-rating of shares; investors were willing to pay a higher multiple for profits. But re-rating cannot continue forever.

If investors want a simple parallel with share prices, they need only mm to the American housing market. Back in 2005 an economic adviser to the president said," We’ve never had a decline in housing prices on a nationwide basis. What I think is more likely is that house prices will slow, maybe stabilize."

Lots of people took the same view and were willing to borrow (and lend) on a vast scale on the grounds that higher house prices would always bail them out. They are now counting their losses. Investors in equities should beware of over-committing themselves on the basis of a similar belief Just ask the Japanese.

By referring to the Nikkei 225, the author wants to imply that ()

A. investors will keep buying until prices reach stratospheric levels

B. the universally accepted opinion among American investors isn’t perfect

C. the slide of Nikkei 225 has been longer and deeper than ever before

D. Japanese investors have to wait 50-60 years to earn a positive real return