问题 单项选择题

针对压港现象严重的港口所征收的附加费为()。

A.港口拥挤附加费

B.超时附加费

C.超重附加费

D.选卸港附加费

答案

参考答案:A

阅读理解

The producers of instant coffee found their product strongly resisted in the market places despite their manifest advantages. Furthermore, the advertising cost for instant coffee was far greater than that for regular coffee. Efforts were made to find the cause of the consumers “seemingly unreasonable resistance to the product”. The reason given by most people was dislike for the taste. The producers suspected that there might be deeper reasons. However, this was confirmed by one of motivation research's classic studies, one often cited(引用)in the trade.

Mason Haire, professor of the University of California, constructed two shopping lists that were the same except for one item. There were six items common to both lists: hamburger, carrots, baking powder, bread, canned peaches and potatoes, with the bands or amounts specified. The seventh item, in the fifth place on both lists, read “1 Ib. Maxwell House coffee” on one list and “Nescafe instant coffee” on the other. One list was given to each person in a group of fifty women, and the other list to those in another group of the same size. The women were asked to study their lists and then to describe, as far as they could, the kind of woman(“personality and character”)who would draw up(制定)that shopping list. Nearly half of those who had received the list including instant coffee described a housewife who was lazy and a poor planner. On the other hand, only one woman in the other group described the housewife, who had included regular coffee on her list, as lazy; only six of that group suggested that she was a poor planner. Eight women felt that the instant-coffee user was probably not a good wife. No one in the other group drew such a conclusion about the house-wife who intended to buy regular coffee.

53. In this instance, the purpose of motivation research was to discover      .

why people drink coffee

B. why instant coffee was successful

C. why regular coffee was successful

D. the real reason why people would not buy instant coffee

54. This investigation indicates that       .

50 percent of housewives are lazy

B. housewives who use instant coffee are lazy

C. many women believe that wives who use instant coffee are lazy

D. wives who use regular coffee are good planners

55. On the results of this test, the producers probably revised their advertising to show a     .

lazy housewife using regular coffee

B. hard-working housewife using instant coffee

C. lazy housewife using instant coffee

D. man obviously enjoying the taste of instant coffee

56. It is implied but not stated that       .

A. Despite its advantages, most people dislike instant coffee because of its taste.

B. The advertising cost for instant coffee was greater than for regular coffee.

C. Very often we do not know the real reasons for doing things.

D. Taste is the principal factor in determining what we buy.

问答题

九、
  请根据下列材料起草民事判决书。
  原告:曹××,男,汉族,出生年月:19××年×月××;中铁第十四工程局,工程师;住址:山东省济南市××路××号
  被告:北京××有限责任公司,法定代表人:刘××;住所:北京市×××区××号××甲××号;电话:××××
  曹××系中铁十四局施工管理处工程师,现为中铁十四局青藏铁路工程指挥部副总工程师兼工程部部长。为参加2000年7月25日铁道部组织的“青藏铁路施工技术报告会”,曹××于7月24日下午入住北京××有限责任公司北楼宾馆235房间,在25日凌晨5点多钟起床时发现手机、手表以及手包等物品被盗。他立即报告楼层服务员,楼层服务员在他的再三催促下,才去报告一楼值班的经理,6点20分保安部的杨××去235房间作了笔录,看了窗子和门。曹××在25日7点半左右离开房间参加会议,当日下午15点左右赶回宾馆,17点左右由杨××带着去派出所报案。后曹××多次要求北京××有限责任公司赔偿未果,于是提起诉讼,要求北京××有限责任公司赔偿因被盗的手机、手表及现金损失共计14160元。被告则辩称我公司在宾馆大堂及每个房间中都备有旅客住宿需知,其中明确规定贵重物品及现金要寄存,曹××未寄存物品导致丢失之责任由其自负。宾馆的保安措施符合有关部门的规定,我公司没有过失,因此不承担赔偿责任。被告提交了相关的照片和2000年联组互查安全情况评分标准及扣分结果等证据。
  原告辩称,1.其一,××有限责任公司北楼宾馆的职员证实我在7月24日晚22点以后始终在房间里,并未外出;其二,我手机的通话清单证实,报失前的最后一次通话是在当天晚上的22点以后。结合上述两点理由,可以证明我的手机在北京××有限责任公司北楼宾馆房间里丢失的事实。2.被告认为我没有按照北京××有限责任公司北楼宾馆的店堂公告和旅客住宿需知寄存物品因而不承担赔偿责任,不符合法律规定。即使不考虑上述告示是否绝对有效,也存在如下问题:首先,手机手表等随身携带的物品依性质是不应寄存的物品;第二,被告提交的照片等证据并没有证明它提供了寄存现金的场所和设施,因为他提供的照片只是表明有“小件寄存处”。3.该宾馆的安全保卫措施存在疏漏。第一,被告提交的安全检查情况不能作为我当时所住房间安全情况的证据,因为安全检查事项中的门锁是磁卡门锁,与我所住房间的门锁不同,这有被告提交法庭的我所住房间的照片为证。第二,被告承认房间的门锁安全扣丢了一个螺丝,这不能说明符合安全要求,而且同时北楼宾馆238房间的旅客也报案被盗。7月25日下午我在杨××陪同下去派出所报案时,派出所的警察也提到××有限责任公司北楼宾馆安全情况不好,因此被告认为安全保卫工作并无疏漏与事实不符。