问题 问答题

归纳而言,本论主要讲了什么样的修行次第?这对你有哪些启示?

答案

参考答案:

1)修行次第:我们要先做好人(贤善人格),其次对世间不要贪执而生出离心,再次为利益众生而发菩提心,在这个基础上才可以修学密法或者般若法门。

2)释迦牟尼佛的法门有八万四千那么多,千经万论浩如烟海,全部要学习的话,短暂人生中怎么学得完呢?但这里将所有的教言归纳起来,让我们完全明白:要成佛的话,一定要修无二慧,无二慧又依靠出离心、菩提心、做好人。这几个窍诀涵摄了一切法,懂得这个道理后,我们修行应当以此为方向。

问答题 案例分析题
阅读理解

Ban Fur? Then Why Not Leather?

Much to the displeasure of some local businesses, the City Council in West Hollywood, California, voted without opposition last week to ban the sale of fur products. Should laws be involved in this issue? Is it unfair to ban sales of fur, but not sales of leather and hides (兽皮)?

Animals Do Not Have Rights

By Tibor R. Machan

My view is that animals do not have basic rights. It is a matter of ethics (伦理学) and not of the laws of human societies. If animals had such rights as human beings do, they would have to be held responsible for killing fellow animals in the wild. That way of thinking about animals makes a category mistake. Using animals, including their fur or organs, to improve people's lives is acceptable.

A Small Step Against Cruelty

By Kate Carter

Both fur and leather are the skins of dead animals. Why should we think that the lovable furry ones deserve more of a life than the less pleasing ones? Some say leather is  less cruel because it's a byproduct (副产品) of the meat industry. But this isn't really true. Some cheap leather may be a byproduct of the meat industry, but often it's the other way round. In South Africa, where there is a developing market for ostrich(鸵鸟)farms, the skins account for roughly 80 percent of the slaughtered (宰杀)birds' value, a mere 20 percent of which comes from the meat.

"Who" Are You Wearing?

By Marc Bekoff

West Hollywood's ban is a move in the right direction. However, we must work to ban the sales of leather and hides, too. Furs come from animals who are attacked to become clothing, while some leather and hides come from slaughterhouse(屠宰场) animals. We must remember that when people choose to wear fur, leather and hides, they are wearing formering conscious beings. So it's a matter of who they are wearing, not what they are wearing because these animals must be referred to as who and not what or that.

小题1:What is the passage mainly about?

A.West Hollywood's ban on fur products.

B.Differences between fur and leather sales.

C.The government's role in protecting animals.

D.The ecological imbalance in West Hollywood.小题2:Tibor R. Machan seems to believe that         .

A.laws should be passed to protect animals

B.humans are respornsible for killing animals

C.it is not reasonable to use animals to improve life

D.animals and humans aren't supposed to share equal rights小题3:What is Kate Carter's opinion about wearing fur and wearing leather?

A.Both are decided by the meat industry.

B.There is little distinction (区别) between them.

C.Wearing fur is generally more acceptable.

D.Wearing leather is cheaper than wearing fur.小题4:What is Marc Bekoff’s attitude towards sales of fur?

A.Sympathetic.

B.Careless.

C.Tolerant.

D.Opposed.