问题 单项选择题

以下哪一项内容不符合癌症患者进行活动功能康复的原则()

A.能下地活动的患者可进行日常生活活动以及较低强度的运动和作业训练

B.血小板降低者谨慎运动,过低者禁忌运动

C.贫血及心肺功能下降者应控制运动强度

D.骨转移癌与严重骨质疏松症患者禁忌患部运动

E.已发生病理性骨折者禁忌患部运动

答案

参考答案:D

单项选择题

Weak dollar or no, $ 46,000-the price for a single year of undergraduate instruction amid the red brick of Harvard Yard-is (1) But nowadays cost is (2) barrier to entry at many of America’s best universities. Formidable financial-assistance policies have (3) fees or slashed them deeply for needy students. And last month Harvard announced a new plan designed to (4) the sticker-shock for undergraduates from middle and even upper-income families too.

Since then, other rich American universities have unveiled (5) initiatives. Yale, Harvard’s bitterest (6) , revealed its plans on January 14th. Students whose families make (7) than $60,000 a year will pay nothing at all. Families earning up to $ 200,000 a year will have to pay an average of 10% of their incomes. The university will (8) its financial- assistance budget by 43%, to over $ 80m.

Harvard will have a similar arrangement for families making up to $180,000. That makes the price of going to Harvard or Yale (9) to attending a state-run university for middle-and upper-income students. The universities will also not require any student to take out (10) to pay for their (11) , a policy introduced by Princeton in 2001 and by the University of Pennsylvania just after Harvard’s (12) . No applicant who gains admission, officials say, should feel (13) to go elsewhere because he or she can’t afford the fees.

None of that is quite as altruistic as it sounds. Harvard and Yale are, after all, now likely to lure more students away from previously (14) options, particularly state-run universities, (15) their already impressive admissions figures and reputations.

The schemes also provide a (16) for structuring university fees in which high prices for rich students help offset modest prices for poorer ones and families are less (17) on federal grants and government-backed loans.

Less wealthy private colleges whose fees are high will not be able to (18) Harvard or Yale easily. But America’s state-run universities, which have traditionally kept their fees low and stable, might well try a differentiated (19) scheme as they raise cash to compete academically with their private (20) . Indeed, the University of California system has already started to implement a sliding-fee scale.

14()

A. cheaper

B. more reasonable

C. public

D. better

单项选择题

阅读以下文字,完成下列问题。


现在,明眼人一看就知道,相声明显竞争不过小品。为什么呢
我想,主要的原因,在于现代相声在思想性的追求上有些落伍,整体上不如小品的思想性深刻。
按说,相声艺术发展到今天,在艺术上已经相当成熟了,说学逗唱的功夫和技巧,应该不会比小品逊色多少。小品是舶来品,直接借鉴了西方许多艺术手法,尤其在思想性和哲理性上独领风骚,这是它顺应时代风尚,后来居上的首要原因。
大家知道,新中国成立后,国民的整体素质和文化修养普遍提高,人们的审美层次已经发生了质的飞跃。以往仅仅有趣的艺术形式已经渐渐不能满足人们的需求,人们在追求艺术享受的同时,还追求思想的升华和哲理的启迪,追求“有益的”教诲。这“有益的”,不能理解为政治说教,也不能理解为道德说教,它更多的倾向于知识和哲理,倾向于生活中的真理。每年的春节联欢电视节目中,那些艺术性和思想性俱佳的小品总是最受欢迎的,因为它值得人们花费时间和精力来欣赏。人们在观赏的同时,心灵得到了陶冶,智慧得到了启迪。相反,那些显得有些粗俗,仅仅为了逗得观众一乐的小品,往往并不能赢得广大观众的青睐。
有人说,中国人接受了几千年的说教,现在都有点厌烦了,艺术应该向纯艺术的方向发展。我觉得这是一种错觉。中国人是受了几千年的说教,这不假,但那是什么样的说教呢如果违背科学,违背真理的说教,不要说中国人,更不要说现代的中国人,就是外国人不是也同样反感吗但说教并不意味着就非要违背科学,违背真理,它不许传播科学、弘扬真理、启迪人生的智慧吗人们心中排斥的,只是虚伪造作无用的说教,决不会排斥真、善、美的教诲。向往真理,探究生活的哲理,是人的本能,什么时候也不会改变。
这几年,哲理故事逐渐流行于故事刊物中,为仅仅有趣、出奇的故事注入了一针强心剂,重新拉回了大量的读者,就很能说明这个问题。大量的哲理美文,正风行于网络和各种期刊中,也是一种佐证。它证明人们永远不会拒绝真、善、美的艺术熏陶,不会拒绝有益的启迪。
所以,我愿意为说教争鸣,愿艺术永远不要脱离主题,脱离它该有的思想内涵。

第七段中,划线处“强心剂”一词指的是( )。

A.知识
B.故事
C.趣味
D.哲理