问题 阅读理解

On June 26, 2000, two scientists, called Francis Collins and Craig Venter, told the world that they could now read the whole “map” of the human body: DNA. DNA is something that everybody has, and it tells the body what to do. DNA is the reason that we look like our mother and father, because we get some of their DNA to make our own.

People have been trying to understand the human body for a long time. In 1860, Gregor Mendel discovered a special reason why we look the same as other people in our family. It is because of small things named “genes” in our body. In 1953, James Watson and Francis Crick made another discovery and found out that those small parts are real messages written in the DNA with a special language.

  In 1961, Marshall Nirenberg and Johann Matthaei found a message in DNA showing how DNA tells the cell (细胞) to build its parts. Scientists have now found all the words in the DNA map, but we still do not understand what they all do. By understanding what just one “word” means, we can help save more people from several illnesses.

  Most people hope that this will help make better medicine and help sick people. Other people worry that when people begin to know more words and find out lots of other information, we might use it in a wrong way, just to make people more attractive, or stop sick people from getting jobs. Man would have to meet a lot of trouble if DNA technology (技术) wasn’t limited (限制) in use.

小题1:When did we first know why we look like other people in our family?

A.In 1860.

B.In 1953.

C.In 1961.

D.In 2000.小题2:What did the two scientists first discover in 1961?

A. The “map” of DNA.                     B. A new illness. 

C. The language of DNA.                   D. A message of DNA.

小题3:What can we do if we understand some “words” of the language inside the body?

A.Make people get new jobs.

B.Make medicine for illnesses.

C.Make maps of human.

D.Make people less attractive.小题4:What do people think about this work?

A.It can cause good or bad results.

B.It can cause only good results.

C.It can cause good results but won’t work.

D.It can cause only bad results.

答案

小题1:D

小题2:D

小题3:B

小题4:A

题目分析:短文大意:本文简单介绍了科学家对DNA的研究历程。大多数人希望这将有助于制造更好的药物救治生病的人。其也有人担心这可能会带来一些不好的结果。

小题1: 细节理解题,根据第一段首句On June 26, 2000, two scientists, called Francis Collins and Craig Venter, told the world that they could now read the whole “map” of the human body: DNA 和最后一句DNA is the reason that we look like our mother and father,可知我们第一次知道我们为什么看起来像家庭里的其他人是在2000年,所以选D。

小题2:细节理解题。根据第三段首句In 1961, Marshall Nirenberg and Johann Matthaei found a message in DNA showing how DNA tells the cell  to build its parts可知这两位科学家子啊1961年首次发现了DNA的信息,所以选 D。

小题3:细节理解题。根据Most people hope that this will help make better medicine and help sick people.可知选B。

小题4: 细节理解题。根据Most people hope that this will help make better medicine and help sick people. Other people worry that when people begin to know more words and find out lots of other information, we might use it in a wrong way, just to make people more attractive, or stop sick people from getting jobs.可知人们认为这项工作可能导致好结果,也可能导致坏结果,所以选A。

单项选择题 A3/A4型题
阅读理解与欣赏

阅读下面的访谈,完成下面问题。

  ①杨澜(以下简称“杨”):您看您去过这么多地方,台北、高雄、美国、香港,哪一块地方是您最心爱的?

  余光中(以下简称“余”):这很难说。有人说我是乡愁诗人。我写过好多乡愁诗,可是我觉得我的乡愁呢,不是同乡会式的,不是关乎某省、某县、某村的,因为乡愁可以升华或者普遍化为整个民族的感情寄托。这样说来呢,乡愁就不完全寄托在地理上的某一点,它不仅仅是地理的,也可能是历史的,可以说是历史的乡愁,文化的乡愁,而且在中文里面也可以有所寄托。那一年到东北访问,我在短短的致辞里就讲到,小时候在抗战时就会唱“我的家在东北松花江上”,还有“万里长征万里长”。那时,我没有去过长城,更没去过松花江,可是整个民族的一个大感情就可以融合在一起。我是说着说着眼泪就掉下来了。我有一篇散文,结尾两句我是这样写的:“你以中国的名字为荣,有一天,中国亦将以你的名字……”

  杨:为荣?

  余:没有。

  杨:没有这两个字,所以我不是诗人,就要差这两个字才好。

  ②杨:我们看您的人生经历,觉得您其实并没有遇到过特别大的困难,家庭很美满,生活呢,教书、写诗、写散文、写评论,也是人们想像的比较安定的生活。但您为什么却说“我写作是因为我失去平衡,心理失去保障,而心安理得的人是幸福的,缪斯不会去照顾他们”?

  余:一个人不能光看他表面的职业和家庭。他内心有很多心魔,内心世界可能很复杂,比如他的愿望并没有完全达到,那就不是表面上看得出来的。我在21岁时就离开大陆,那对我是一个很大的打击,因为我的好朋友都忽然不见了。我投入到一个陌生的地方,要重新来过;而且一个人到了21岁,记忆已经很多了,所以这件事情让我念念不忘,也成为我的一个……心结,一个中国结。

  ③杨:今天仍然有很多人喜欢您的诗,但人们的欣赏对象好像发生了一些变化。年轻人喜欢卡通、流行歌曲等那种节奏更快、更有形象感的东西。那么用于看白纸黑字的时间呢,相对就要减少一些了。您觉得未来的诗歌,希望在哪里呢?

  余:这个情况不仅仅存在于大陆、台湾、香港。因为媒体变了,价值观也随之改变了。我向来不认为文艺要大众化,而应该小众化。可如果你连小众都维持不了的话,那就有很大问题了,像三毛也好,或者余秋雨也好,到底还是不能跟一个流行歌星比,对不对?可是,听流行歌的跟读余秋雨散文的还是不一样,所以不能够拿来比较。目前的新诗有相当多的毛病,很多诗人如果得不到知音,也应该反省一下,检讨自己的诗是不是能吸引人,这是多方面的因果现象。

  ④杨:现在年轻一代接触更多的是一种网络上的语言,要想保持中文原来的那种纯粹和一脉相承,已经是越来越难了。您担不担心中文的纯洁度问题,或者认为这是历史发展的必然,所以也要听之任之?

  余:我是相当担心的,也不能听之任之。有学者说,语言就像河流,你不能阻碍它。问题是有河流就有两岸,两岸如果太模糊了,这河流不晓得流到哪儿去了。所以很多人认为语言就由它去,它有它的生命,其实不然。比如说我们目前的中文,如果过分西化的话,中文特色就会荡然无存了。

1.这篇访谈涉及四个方面的内容,请简要概括。

 __________________________________________________

2.阅读访谈第一部分,回答下面的问题。

(1)如何理解余光中所说的乡愁?

 __________________________________________________

(2)为什么杨澜说“就要差这两个字才好”?

 __________________________________________________

3.怎样理解第二部分画线句子的含义?

 __________________________________________________                               

4.第四部分中提到“有学者说,语言就像河流,你不能阻碍它”而余光中认为“有河流就有两岸,两岸如果太模糊了,这河流就不晓得流到哪儿去了”。请联系中文的纯洁度问题,谈谈你的看法。

 __________________________________________________