问题 单项选择题 案例分析题

患者,男性,右腰部红斑、大疱1天。患者5天前因右侧腰痛开始局部贴敷活血止痛膏,两天前局部出现红斑,伴瘙痒感,今日红斑基础上出现水疱。查体:右腰部见一长方形红斑,边界清楚,红斑基础上见一枚直径约2cm张力性大疱,疱壁紧张。

根据病史及临床表现,该患者应诊断为()

A.虫咬皮炎

B.接触性皮炎

C.疱疹样皮炎

D.天疱疮

E.带状疱疹

答案

参考答案:B

阅读理解与欣赏

阅读下面的课外文言文,完成下列各题。(9分,每小题3分)

淮阴侯韩信者,淮阴人也。始为布衣时,贫无行,不得推择为吏,又不能治生商贾,常从人寄食饮,人多厌之者。常数从其下乡南昌亭长寄食,数月,亭长妻患之,乃晨炊蓐食。食时,信往,不为具食。信亦知其意,怒,竟绝去。信钓于城下,有一漂母见信饥,饭信,竟漂数十日。信喜,谓漂母曰:“吾必有以重报母!”母怒曰:“大丈夫不能自食,吾哀王孙而进食,岂望报乎?”淮阴屠中少年有侮信者,曰:“若虽长大,好带刀剑,中情怯耳。”触辱之曰:“信能死,刺我;不能死,出我袴下。”于是信孰视之,俯出袴下,蒲伏。一市人皆笑信,以为怯。

小题1:对下列加点字词的解释错误的一项(    )

A.又不能治生商贾做买卖

B.人多厌之者厌恶

C.若虽长大即使

D.一市人皆笑信全,满小题2:下列语句在文中的正确意思是(     )

(1)常从人寄食饮(2)吾必有以重报母

A.(1)常常到别人家里去吃闲饭(2)我一定会有好东西来报答您

B.(1)经常和大家一起去吃饭(2)我一定会重重的报答您

C.(1)常常到别人家里去吃闲饭(2)我一定会重重的报答您

D.(1)经常和大家一起去吃饭(2)我一定会有好东西来报答您小题3:下列对文意的叙述,不正确的一项(     )

A.韩信虽然后来很有名,但当初也没表露出什么可称道的东西。

B.韩信因为人很好,经常得到大家的帮助,大家纷纷接济他。

C.韩信肯受胯下之辱,表现了他作为大丈夫的能屈能伸。

D.漂母送给韩信食物吃,又不求报答,可见她的善良。

单项选择题

A very important world problem, if not the most serious of all the great world problems which affect us at the moment, is the increasing number of people who actually inhabit this planet. The limited amount of land and land resources will soon be unable to support the huge population if it continues to grow at its present rate.

In an early survey conducted in 1888, a billion and a half people inhabited the earth. Now, the population exceeds five billion and is growing fast—by the staggering figure of 90 million in 1988 alone. This means that the world must accommodate a new population roughly equal to that of the United States and Canada every three years! Even though the rate of growth has begun to slow down, most experts believe the population size will still pass eight billion during the next 50 years.

So why is this huge increase in population taking place It is really due to the spread of the knowledge and practice of what is becoming known as "Death Control". You have no doubt heard of the term "Birth Control"—" Death Control" is something rather different. It recognizes the work of the doctors and scientists who now keep alive people who, not very long ago, would have died of a variety of then incurable diseases. Through a wide variety of technological innovations that include farming methods and sanitation, as well as the control of these deadly diseases, we have found ways to reduce the rate at which we die—creating a population explosion. We used to think that reaching seventy years old was a remarkable achievement, but now eighty or even ninety is becoming recognized as the normal life-span for humans. In a sense, this represents a tremendous achievement for our species. Biologically this is the very definition of success and we have undoubtedly become the dominant animal on the planet. However, this success is the very cause of the greatest threat to mankind.

Man is constantly destroying the very resources which keep him alive. He is destroying the balance of nature which regulates climate and the atmosphere, produces and maintains healthy soils, provides food from the seas, etc. In short, by only considering our needs of today we are ensuring there will be no tomorrow.

An understanding of man’s effect on the balance of nature is crucial to be able to find the appropriate remedial action. It is a very common belief that the problems of the population explosion are caused mainly by poor people living in poor countries who do not know enough to limit their reproduction. This is not true. The actual number of people in an area is not as important as the effect they have on nature. Developing countries do have an effect on their environment, but it is the populations of richer countries that have a far greater impact on the earth as a whole.

The birth of a baby in, for example, Japan, imposes more than a hundred times the amount of stress on the world’s resources as a baby in India. Most people in India do not grow up to own cars or air-conditioners—nor do they eat the huge amount of meat and fish that the Japanese child does. Their life-styles do not require vast quantities of minerals and energy. Also, they are aware of the requirements of the land around them and try to put something back into nature to replace what they take out.

For example, tropical forests are known to be essential to the balance of nature yet we are destroying them at an incredible rate. They are being cleared not to benefit the natives of that country, but to satisfy the needs of richer countries. Central American forests are being destroyed for pastureland to make pet food in the United States cheaper; in Papua New Guinea, forests are destroyed to supply cheaper cardboard packaging for Japanese electronic products; in Burma and Thailand, forests have been destroyed to produce more attractive furniture in Singapore and Japan. Therefore, a rich person living thousands of miles away may cause more tropical forest destruction than a poor person living in the forest itself.

In short then, it is everybody’s duty to safeguard the future of mankind-not only through population control, but by being more aware of the effect his actions have on nature. Nature is both fragile and powerful. It is very easily destroyed; on the other hand, it can so easily destroy its most aggressive enemy—man.

The writer’ s main purpose in paragraph 6 is to argue that()

A. people in developed countries generally have more impact on nature than others

B. Japanese children are generally better than children born in India

C. Japanese children consume too much of the world’s resources

D. people from some countries are more selfish than others in their consumption of resources