问题 单项选择题

颅脑开发性损伤的处理原则中,下面哪项不正确()

A.开发性颅脑损伤应争取在6~8h内施行清创术

B.对插入颅腔的致伤物,不管在什么部位,在清创时均可直接取出

C.清创时应充分了解骨折、碎骨片、脑挫裂伤和颅内血肿情况

D.累及静脉窦时,术前应充分备血及其他相关准备后方可进行清创

E.清创术中应严密修复硬膜,并处理好损伤的副鼻窦

答案

参考答案:B

阅读理解与欣赏

阅读下面的文言文,完成1-4题。

  邓攸字伯道,平阳襄陵人也。攸七岁丧父,寻丧母及祖母,居丧九年,以孝致称。清和平简,贞正寡欲。初,祖父殷有赐官,敕攸受之。后太守劝攸去王官,欲举为孝廉,攸曰:“先人所赐,不可改也。”尝诣镇军贾混,混以人讼事示攸,使决之。攸不视,曰:“孔子称听讼吾犹人也,必也使无讼乎!”混奇之,以女妻焉。攸历太子洗马、东海王越参军。越钦其为人,转为世子文学、吏部郎。越弟腾为东中郎将,请攸为长史。出为河东太守。

  永嘉末,没于石勒。然勒宿忌诸官长二千石,闻攸在营,驰召,将杀之。攸至门,门干乃攸为郎时干,识攸,攸求纸笔作辞。干候勒和悦,致之。勒重其辞,乃勿杀。勒长史张宾先与攸比舍,重攸名操,因称攸于勒。勒召至幕下,与语,悦之,以为参军,给车马。勒每东西,置攸车营中。勒夜禁火,犯之者死。攸与胡邻毂,胡夜失火烧车。吏按问,胡乃诬攸。攸度不可与争,遂对以弟妇散发温酒为辞。勒赦之。既而胡人深感,自缚诣勒以明攸,而阴遗攸马驴,诸胡莫不叹息宗敬之。

  荀组以为陈郡、汝南太守,愍帝征为尚书左丞、长水校尉,皆不果就。元帝以攸为太子中庶子。时吴郡阙守,人多欲之,帝以授攸。攸载米之郡,俸禄无所受,唯饮吴水而已。时郡中大饥,攸表振贷,未报,乃辄开仓救之。台遣散骑常侍桓彝、虞骏慰劳饥人,观听善不,乃劾攸以擅出谷。俄而有诏原之。攸在郡刑政清明,百姓欢悦,为中兴良守。后称疾去职。郡常有送迎钱数百万,攸去郡,不受一钱。百姓数千人留牵攸船,不得进,攸乃小停,夜中发去。百姓诣台乞留一岁,不听。拜侍中。岁余,转吏部尚书。蔬食弊衣,周急振乏。性谦和,善与人交,宾无贵贱,待之若一,而颇敬媚权贵。

  有司奏攸不堪行郊而拜道左,坐免。攸每有进退,无喜愠之色。久之,迁尚书右仆射。咸和元年卒,赠光禄大夫,加金章紫绶,祠以少牢。(选自《晋书·邓攸传》,有删改)

1.对下列句子中加粗词的解释,不正确的一项是(     )

A.孔子称听吾犹人也——论:诉讼

B.于石勒——没:俘虏

C.勒长史张宾先与攸舍——比:比较

D.俄而有诏之——原:原谅

2.以下六句话分别编为四组,全部能够说明邓攸受人赏识的一组是(     )

①混奇之,以女妻焉

②重攸名操,因称攸于勒

③勒每东西,置攸车营中

④自缚诣勒以明攸,而阴遗攸马驴

⑤时吴郡阙守,人多欲之,帝以授攸

⑥乃劾攸以擅出谷

A.①③⑥

B.②③⑤

C.②③⑥

D.①②④

3.下列对原文有关内容的分析和概括,不正确的一项是(     )

A.邓攸身世悲苦,亲人先后去世,他守孝达九年之久,遂以孝著称。他因为为人平易和气、生活简朴、正直廉洁而被许多人喜欢。

B.石勒曾经俘虏过邓攸,因为赏识邓攸的文辞,不但没有杀死他,而且每次外出征伐,都把邓攸安置在车营里。

C.吴郡闹饥荒,邓攸上表请求朝廷允许开仓赈灾,但朝廷还未答复,他就擅自开仓救济饥民。由此,邓攸遭人弹劾而被贬了官职。

D.邓攸一生数次迁职,总能以平和的心态对待,没有欣喜或怨怒的表情。他善于与人交往,但有时对权贵有些敬媚。

4.把文言文阅读材料中加横线的句子翻译成现代汉语。

(1)尝诣镇军贾混,混以人讼事示攸,使决之。

译文:____________________________________________

(2)然勒宿忌诸官长二千石,闻攸在营,驰召,将杀之。

译文:____________________________________________

单项选择题


With 2005 fast becoming "the year of the natural disaster", it is time to reflect on how engineering, science and technology can play their fullest part in protecting the planet.
Long before the Asian tsunami struck, the science community predicted the particular region of Indonesia to be hit by the next big earthquake; and the engineering and technology community had developed early warning systems costing only $ 30 million. But no government in the region heeded the warnings and no early warning systems were in place. We ignored technology of the advance warnings at our peril of 100,000 victims of the tsunami.
Governments are not alone in ignoring the views of their scientific community; the public too has its doubts. Part of the reason for this lack of confidence must be down to the failure to engage them in a meaningful way about their concerns. Trust is a two-way street. Instead of claiming that everything would be rosy in the scientific garden "if only the public understood", we must work hard to explore concerns, discover fears and delve deep into the depths of public perceptions. We are getting there. There is a growing realization that effective public engagement is of far greater value than banging the "public understanding" drum.
There are still doubters, of course, and sadly their cause is helped whenever they come across opinions presented as fact. All of us must guard against this debilitating practice. In time, effective public engagement should help deliver improved trust as well as better policy, which -- in turn -- might make it more difficult for scientists’ warnings to be ignored.
Today’s technology community is a triumph of international collaboration where engineers and scientists combine to develop solutions to our biggest problems. Of course, technology cannot stop natural disasters but it can mitigate their impact. We are able to identify the birds affected by avian flu. We can chart their migration patterns around the world. We have the means to pursue vaccines. And we have the communication channels to keep people informed.
Extolling the virtues of technology is not to pretend technology is perfect in every regard. Far from it. The profligate and unsustainable use of technology in energy and transport has contributed to climate change. But that doesn’t mean technology has failed us. We must never lose sight of the fact that technology itself will deliver the solutions to the very problems it can create. If we do, technology will remain sidelined and undervalued, and this major social failure will progressively disadvantage us all.
Our vision is of a society embracing technology as a weapon of both progress and defense. Since the beginning of civilization, we have relied on it and enjoyed its benefits -- and most new technologies have had hugely beneficial effects for most people. But now, in an age when the death toll from natural disasters is increasing year on year, with more people living in danger zones, it is ever more urgent that we rely on science and technology to warn us of the dangers to come and provide the solutions we need.

Which of the following does the author view as the key points of Paragraph 6 Ⅰ. Imperfect as it is, technology has not failed us.Ⅱ. The wasteful use of technology in transport is an example to change climate.Ⅲ. Problems created by technology can only be solved by technology itself.

A.Ⅰ and Ⅱ

B.Ⅱ and Ⅲ

C.Ⅰ and Ⅲ

D.Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ