问题 单项选择题

下列不是青春期独立性和依附性矛盾表现的是()。

A.与家庭联系逐渐疏远

B.对老师教导产生质疑

C.出现品行问题

D.千方百计寻找独立天地

E.对父母的态度矛盾

答案

参考答案:C

问答题

案情:2006年10月29日下年5时,被告人朱×与任× ×预谋后,窜至某小学门口,将学生于××以代其父母来接其放学为由骗上出租车,拉至×区×乡一废弃房屋中,后打电话给王× ×.母亲称孩子在其手上,并索要现金20万元。二被告于次日被抓获。被告人朱×、任××的行为均已构成绑架罪,应依法惩处。被告人朱):聘请了徐 ××作为自己的辩护律师;任××聘请了刘×、王××作为自己的代理律师。
以下是××区人民法院制作的一审判决书:
××区人民法院
一审刑事判决书
(2007) ××刑公初字第x号
公诉人××县人民检察院。
被告人朱×,男,18岁,1988年8月9日出生于××省××市,汉族,系××市第三十五中学学生,住××市××区××路××院××号。
被告人任××,女,17岁,1989年9月×日出生于××省××市,汉族,初中文化程度,捕前系××省××市××镇× ×村农民,在××市××区××工厂干临时工。
法定代理人赵××,男,1969年4月19日出生,农民,住××省××市城关××坝×号,系被告人任××之姨父。
辩护人徐××,××律师事务所律师。
辩护人刘××、王××,××律师事务律师。
××区人民检察院以×检刑诉(2007)3号起诉书指控被告人朱×、任××犯绑架罪,于2007年1月14日向本院提起公诉。本院受理后,依法组成合议庭,公开开庭审理了本案。现已审理终结。
××区人民检察院××检察员指控:
2006年10月29日下年5时,被告人朱×与任××预谋后,窜至某小学门口,将学生于××以代其父母接其放学为由骗上出租车,拉至×区×乡一废弃房屋中,后打电话给王××母亲称孩子在其手上,,并索要现金20万元。被告人朱×、任××的行为均已构成绑架罪,应依法惩处。
被告人朱x辩称:在钱还没有到手时,我由于害怕,就给他钱,让他坐车走了,没有继续绑架,我认为属于犯罪中止。任××对上述事实无异议,无辩护意见。
被告人朱x的辩护人辩称:本案宜区分主从关系,朱某不是主犯,也没有实施暴力、胁迫等伤害人质的行为,缺乏绑架罪的构成要件,应定为敲诈勒索罪;两被告人主动放弃犯罪,属于犯罪中止,又系初犯,认罪态度好,应当减轻处罚。被告人任××的辩护人辩称:本案定性不准,应定为敲诈勒索罪,任××起次要作用,系从犯,犯罪时未满十八周岁,并且中止犯罪,应当减轻处罚。
公诉人答辩认为:从本案被告人犯罪所侵犯的客体、实施对象等方面看,被告人的行为应构成绑架罪,而不是敲诈勒索罪;被告人已经实施了绑架行为,不存在中止犯罪。
经审理查明:2006年10月29日下年5时,被告人朱×与任××预谋后,窜至某小学门口,以代其父母接其放学为名,将小学生于××骗上出租车,拉至×区×乡一废弃房屋中,由任x x在此看守于××。朱××坐车到××区邮局等处,先后三次打电话威胁于××的母亲周××,索要现金先后从二十万元降至十万元,并指使周××到××商场巨幅广告牌下交线。当晚9时许,被告人朱×在××商场周围再次打电话催促周××送钱时,有人上前搭话,朱因惧怕,遂慌忙坐出租车返回×乡废弃房屋内,把身上仅有的20元钱交给于××,让于坐上出租车到一雕塑前等候其母亲。后与任××逃离现场。两被告人于当夜被抓获。 本院认为,被告人朱×、陈××以勒索财物为目的,绑架他人,其行为均已构成绑架罪。公诉机关对被告人的指控成立。被告人朱x在犯罪过程中起主要作用,系主犯,任××犯罪时不满十八周岁,犯罪过程中起次要作用,系从犯,应当减轻处罚。被告人朱×及辩护人关于两被告人系犯罪中止、不区分主从关系的辩护意见,于法无据,本院不予支持。其它辩护意见有理部分,予以采信。判决如下:
被告人朱×犯绑架罪,判处有期徒刑十年,并处罚金五千元。
被告人任××犯绑架罪,判处有期徒刑四年,并处罚金三千元。
(刑期从判决执行之日起计算,判决执行以前先行羁押的,羁押一日折抵刑期一日。被告人朱×的刑期自2006年10月30日起至2016年10月29日止;被告人任××的刑期自2006年10月30日起至2010年10月29日止。)
上述罚金于判决生效后五日内向本院缴纳。
审判长:张××
人民陪审员:杨××
人民陪审员:黄××
二OO七年二月十六日
问题:请根据刑事判决书的法律规定和基本理论,从对法律文书规范化的角度,分析本刑事判决书存在哪些问题,并简要说明理由。

阅读理解

  A vegetarian(素食者)diet may help to protect people against cancer, a UK study suggests. Analysis of data from 52,700 man and women shows that those who did not eat meat had significantly fewer cancers than those who did.

Published in American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, the findings were worth looking into .Although it is widely recommended that people eat some fruits and vegetables every day to reduce their risk of cancer and other diseases, there is very little evidence showing that a vegetarian diet can surely reduce cancers .

But surprisingly, the researchers also found a higher rate of colorectal(直肠的)cancer – a disease connected with eating red meat – among the vegetarians.

Study leader Professor Tim Key, a researcher at the University of Oxford, said no previous study had looked at the diet in this way and that there had been a lot of confusion about the issue.

“It’s interesting – it suggests there might be some reduction in cancers in vegetarians, but we need to look carefully at that”, said the professor.

More work is needed to show the connections between diet and cancer but such studies are very hard to do. Dr Joanne Lunn, a senior nutrition scientist at the British Nutrition Foundation, said the findings highlighted the fact that cancer is a complex disease and many different lifestyle factors play a part in determining a person’s risk.

73. What would be the best title for the passage?

A. Reasons for getting cancers.

B. Vegetarians get fewer cancers.

C. Tips on avoiding cancers.

D. A surprising discovery on colorectal cancer.

74. Why are the findings worth looking into?

A. They can encourage healthy eating.

B. They show that cancer is a complex disease.

C. they show a brand new discovery.

D. They have been published in American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

75. We can learn from the passage that _________.

A. people eating red meat are unlikely to get colorectal cancer

B. the diet is one of the many factors that determine a person’s health

C. the connections between a vegetarian diet and cancer are clear through the research

D. scientists will soon figure out the relationship between the diet and cancer