书面表达。
最近教育部就高中取消文理分科的可能性和可操作性,广泛征集意见。消息一经传出,立即成为人们热议的话题。社会各方对此存在严重分歧。支持者认为,取消文理分科有利
于学生全面发展。分科会导致部分文科学生缺乏科学精神,部分理科学生不关心社会问题。反对者认为,取消文理分科将加重学生学习负担。分科尊重学生个体差异。请你给China
Daily 写一篇文章,阐述分歧,并发表自己的观点(至少两点)。
要求:
(1) 可根据内容要点适当增加细节,使行文连贯;
(2) 词数:150 左右。短文开头已为你写好,不计入总词数。
参考词汇:
1 .文理分科:separate students into science and art
2 .文科生:liberal art students
3 .理科生:science students
The Ministry of Education has been collecting opinions on the possibility and feasibility of ending
the separation of science and arts in high schools.
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
One possihle version:
The Ministry of Education has been collecting opinions
on the possibility and feasibility of ending the separation of
science and arts in high schools.
Most experts advocate the ending of the division of sci-
ence and arts. They indicate that the separation of subjects
strongly affects the overall quality of our people. It will result
in some art students' lacking the spirit of exploring science as
well as some science students' not caring about important is-
sues,such as society and human beings. To them,without the
separation,students are more likely to develop all-around abil-
ities.
However, many students and parents oppose this
opinion,saying that canceling the separation of subjects means
putting more pressure and burdens on students,while focusing
on fewer courses enables students to excel in specific areas.
Furthermore,each student has his or her strengths and weak-
nesses,which needs to be respected.
In my opinion,even though our society needs more ex-
perts rather than people who are "Jack of all trades but master
of none" ,separating subjects too early is not good for students'
future development. What's more,it is unrealistic to talk
about this issue if the present system of examination isn't re-
formed. 'rherefore,the Ministry of Education had better take a
cautious attitude toward this problem.