问题 写作题
基础写作
        你班同学开展了一场"司机醉驾是否应该处罚乘客"的讨论.请你根据下表提供的信息, 给报社写一封信, 介绍讨论的情况, 并发表你的看法.
     [写作内容] 
           少数同学赞成处罚乘客             大多数同学反对处罚乘客
1.减少交通事故,促进交通安全
2. 不乘坐醉酒司机的车,不仅是对自己负责, 也是对司机和路人负责
1.乘客难以判断司机是否醉酒
2. 即使乘客知道司机饮酒, 如果司机不听从乘客的劝诫, 处罚乘客是不公平的
你的看法......
     [写作要求]
只能使用5个句子表达全部内容;开头已为你写好,不计入句子总数.
     [评分标准]句子结构准确,信息内容完整,篇章结构连贯.
Dear Editor,
     I'm writing to tell you about the discussion we've had about whether passengers who ride in a car
driven by a drunken driver should be punished.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________                                                                                 
                                                                                                                      Yours sincerely,
                                                                                                                             Li Hua
答案

Dear Editor,

     I'm writing to tell you about the discussion we've had about whether passengers who ride in a car

driven by a drunken driver should be punished. The minority of  the students hold the opinion that punishing the passengers helps to reduce traffic accidents and increase traffic safety. Not to ride in a car driven by a

drunken driver is not only a responsible behavior for passengers themselves but also for the drivers and

other people on the road.

     The majority of the students, however, disapprove of the idea, stating that it is difficult for common

passengers to know whether the driver has been drinking or not. What's more, even if the passenger knows the driver has drunk alcohol and has attempted to persuade the driver not to drive, it is unfair to punish  

the passenger when the driver does not follow the advice. As far as I am concerned, punishing passengers as well as the drivers is not only unfair but is also hard to carry out.

                                                                                                                      Yours sincerely,

                                                                                                                              Li Hua

答案不唯一

单项选择题
问答题

上海纺织局第三医院为了医治患了癌症的病人,新建了医用直线加速器机房,机房有着良好的防护设备,以防止高能X射线的泄漏。但是,医院料想不及的是当时日本电视连续剧《血疑》风靡上海,剧中女主人公因受辐射而患上绝症的不幸遭遇,给那些居住在机房附近的居民心中蒙上一层阴影。大家都怀疑自己正处于高能X射线的辐射之中。于是,居民由恐惧到愤怒,奋笔疾书,向区防疫站、区环保局、区人大代表表示抗议。认为“医院这样做不道德! 直线加速器必须停机!”居民们的抗议引起了医院的高度重视。然而,要停掉直线加速器是不可能的,当时上海仅有几台直线加速器。每逢医院开机治疗时,那些被癌症折磨得痛苦万分的病人们,早早就在候医室长椅上排起一长溜的队伍。况且,医院对直线加速器释放出的高能X射线是有严格防护措施的。直线加速器机房四周的墙壁是1.2公尺厚的钢筋水泥墙,放置机器的房间有2公尺厚的钢筋水泥墙。因此,开机时很少有X射线泄漏。即使有微量的射线泄漏,对人体也无害。可是这一切,居民并不了解。为了消除居民心头上的阴影,协调好医院与社区公众的关系,医院抓住“门户开放、双向沟逼”这一问题的关键,采取了一系列公关措施。首先,医院摘下“机房重地,闲人免入”的牌子,请进居民群众,让他们参观了解直线加速器,由医生讲解直线加速器的工作原理和医治癌症的作用,消除人们对它的神秘感。其次,请区防疫站总工程师重新实地测试,并对居民最怀疑的一堵墙作了技术处理,直至居民感到满意为止。第三,召开居民座谈会。会上,区防疫站总工程师公布了测试数据,有关技术人员介绍了高能X射线的特点及防御方法。第四,实地走访。院方派出有关人员深入居民家中,对其中一居民反映家中电视机10点钟后图象不清的问题进行实地勘察,结果表明这户居民家中的两台电视机,一台本身有毛病,另一台则是天线选择不当。为了进一步消除居民疑虑,院方请他们到机房,观看正在开机时机房内电视机清晰的图象,证明其丝毫不受高能X射线的影响。并且告诉居民们,晚上10点后院内直线加速器早已停机,所以不存在X射线影响电视机图像清晰的问题。
经过这一系列的公关活动,解开了居民们心头的疑团,他们纷纷表示对医院的理解和支持,为医院创造了一个良好的外部环境。
试结合有关的公共关系知识分析以上案例。