问题 问答题 案例分析题

阅读材料,回答问题。材料:某中学初一学生黄某,其家长是收废品的,一天来上课时脖子没有洗干净。在上数学课时,老师发现了黄某的脖子脏,就叫他站起来给大家看,把他作为典型,教育其他的学生要讲卫生,并当着全班同学的面说:"让你那收破烂的父母把你的脖子洗净。"老师的这种做法给张华的心灵造成了极大伤害,在这以后,每当上这位老师的数学课时,黄某就感到似乎大家都在盯着他的脖子,同时想起老师说的"让你那收破烂的父母把你的脖子洗净",感到抬不起头。这种心理妨碍了他集中精力听课,所以数学课考试成绩很差,老师狠狠地批评了他。黄某终于忍受不住了,他把这件事告诉了母亲,母亲向学校要求调换班级,学校领导知道这件事后同意了。后来,黄某的数学成绩有了很大地提高。

问题:

(1)老师的做法是否合法?违背了哪些相关法律条文?

(2)教师应该如何依法执教?

答案

参考答案:

(1)违法。违反的教育法律法规条文如下:《未成年人保护法》规定,学校、幼儿园应该关心、爱护学生。学校、幼儿园、托儿所的教职员工应当尊重未成年人的人格尊严,不得对未成年人实施体罚、变相体罚或者其他侮辱人格尊严的行为。上述材料中的老师没有尊重黄某的人格尊严,在全班人面前歧视黄某,给其带来了严重的心理伤害。没有尽到关心学生、爱护学生的责任。在全班同学面前说"让你那收破烂的父母把你的脖子洗净"侮辱了黄某的人格,伤害了黄某的尊严。

(2)根据相关法律法规,教师应该:①关心、热爱学生;②尊重学生人格而不能侮辱学生人格;③不能体罚或变相体罚学生;④不能伤害学生的心理,而要促进学生的心理健康。

单项选择题
问答题

A few weeks back, I asked a 14-year-old friend how she was coping with school.
Referring to stress, she heaved a big sigh and said: "Aiyah, anything bad that can happen has already happened."
Her friends nearby then started pouring out their woes about which subjects they found hard, and so on. Pessimism again, in these all-too-familiar remarks about Singapore’s education system, widely regarded as too results-oriented, and I wonder why I even bothered to ask.
The school system of reaching for A’s underlies the country’s culture, which emphasizes the chase for economic excellence where wealth and status are must-haves.
Such a culture is hard to change.
So when I read of how the new Remaking Singapore Committee had set one of its goals as challenging the traditional roads to success, encouraging Singaporeans to realize alternative careers in the arts, sports, research or as entrepreneurs, I had my doubts about its success in this area, if not coupled with help from parents themselves.
The new Remaking Singapore Committee is a brainchild of the Singaporean Prime Minister, formed to make Singaporeans look beyond the five C’s: cash, condos, clubs, credit cards and cars, to help prepare the nation for the future.
It is good that the government wants to do something about the country’s preoccupation with material success. But it will be a losing battle if the family unit itself is not involved because I believe the committee’s success is rooted in a revamp of an entire culture built from 37 years of independence.
This makeover has to start with the most basic societal unit -- the family.
Parents should not drown their children in mantras of I-want-hundred-marks. Tuition lessons are not the be-all and end-all of life. And a score of 70 for a Chinese paper is definitely not the end of life.
If ever I become a parent, I will bring my children camping. I will show them that cooking food in a mess tin over a campfire is fun. I will teach them that there is nothing dirty about lying on a sleeping bag over grass.
In fact, it is educational because Orion is up there in the night sky with all the other bright stars whose shapes and patterns tell something more than a myth. For instance, they give directions to the lost traveler, I will say.
And who knows, my child may become an astronomer years down the road. All because of the nights I spent with him watching the twinkles in the sky.
That’s my point. Parents should teach their children that there’s more to life than studies. Better still if the nation’s leaders echo that idea as well.
This way, when their children aspire to be the next Joscelin Yeo, they won’t feel like they are fighting a losing battle against a society that holds doctors and lawyers in awe.
However, the culture that babysits economic excellence is deeply ingrained and so are the mindsets of many parents. But parents can take the cue from the new Remaking Singapore Committee and be aware of giving their children the right kind of education.
It is now wait-and-see if, say, 10 years down the road, more would choose alternative careers. Hopefully, by then no one would think sportsmen or musicians as making too big a sacrifice in chasing their dreams.