问题 单项选择题

下列哪种说法不妥()

A.谵妄病人突然变得安静,说明病情一定好转

B.谵妄病人可出现片段妄想

C.谵妄病人常有定向障碍

D.谵妄病人可出现被害妄想

E.谵妄病人可发生冲动、行为

答案

参考答案:A

问答题 案例分析题

分析如下两个场景的环境创设场景一:某幼儿园的运动场上摆放着攀爬网、独木桥、高跷、跳袋、推车等运动器具,小朋友们自由选择好器具后开始玩了起来。通过观察发现攀爬网、独木桥被冷落,较少幼儿喜欢玩。过了一会,一个叫圆圆的幼儿对好朋友哲哲说:"我们一起去玩攀爬网好吗?"哲哲皱着眉头说:"不要,我害怕。"圆圆又指着稍矮一些的独木桥说:"那我们一起去玩那边的独木桥吧,这个矮一点,你该不怕了吧!"哲哲还是一脸为难的样子说:"我不想去,还是你自己去吧。"说着就去玩小推车了。就这样圆圆只能独自一人去玩了……一连许多日子,虽然老师在不断地鼓励幼儿,但是运动时段里像圆圆那样去攀爬网运动的小朋友较其他地方的要少许多。场景二:在提供的运动器械的基础上,幼儿教师们增加了一些小道具:如瓢虫帽子、软布小花、软塑积木、用纸板箱制作的猫咪、钓竿及幼儿绘画的小鱼等,创设出给小猫喂鱼(设置了独木桥)、瓢虫种花(设置了攀爬网)、造高楼等游戏情景。经过观察发现,这三项活动参与的幼儿人数不相上下。有意地观察了圆圆和哲哲,起先是圆圆邀请哲哲:"我们去抓鱼给小猫吃好吗?"哲哲欣然应允,两人打扮成捕鱼人,提着鱼篓,手拉手跑了过去。这次哲哲勇敢地蹲在窄窄的独木桥上,努力地抓起了一条大鱼,当他把鱼喂进小猫的嘴里时,脸上露出开心的笑容。接着他主动对圆圆说:"我们去当小瓢虫好吗?"他们一同来到了瓢虫种花的地方,戴上瓢虫帽,把自己装扮成小瓢虫,背上负重的小包,勇敢地向"小山"(攀爬网)跑去……

两个场景中的环境设计有何不同,你赞同哪一种设计,说明理由。

阅读理解

A person named Bernard Jackson today is a free man, but he has many bitter memories. He spent five years in prison after a jury (陪审团)wrongly convicted (判处…有罪) him of raping two women. At Jackson’s trial, although two witnesses testified that Jackson was with them in another location at the time of the crime, he was convicted  anyway. Why? The jury believed the testimony(证词)of the two victims, who positively identified Jackson as the man who had attacked them. The court eventually freed Jackson after the police found the real criminal.

Many factors influence the accuracy of eyewitness testimony. For instance, witnesses sometimes see photographs of several suspects before they try to identify the person they saw in a group of people. They can become confused by seeing many photographs of similar faces. The number of people in the group, and whether it is a person or a photograph, may also affect a witness’s decision. People sometimes have difficulty identifying people of other races. The questions the police ask witnesses also have an effect on them.

Many people believe that police officers are more reliable than ordinary people. Psychologists decided to test this idea, and they discovered that it is not true. Two psychologists showed a film of crimes to both police officers and civilians. The psychologists found no difference between the police and the civilians in correctly remembering the details of the crimes.

Despite all the possibilities for inaccuracy, courts cannot omit eyewitness testimony from a trial. American courts depend almost completely on eyewitness testimony to resolve(决定)court cases. Sometimes it is the only evidence to a crime, such as rape. Furthermore, eyewitness testimony is often correct. Although people do sometimes make mistakes, and convict innocent people, more importantly, eyewitness testimony has rightly convicted a larger number of guilty people.

American courts depend on the ability of the twelve jurors, and not the judges, to determine the accuracy of the witness’s testimony. It is their responsibility to decide if a certain witness could actually see, hear and remember what happened.

小题1:Bernard Jackson was found guilty and sentenced 5 years’ prison because________.

A.the victims insisted that he was the attacker

B.he admitted the crime of raping two women

C.the police discovered evidence leading to his guilt

D.the eyewitness proved the victims’ testimony小题2: The following statements may be the reasons for why sometimes the eyewitness’ testimony is not accurate EXCEPT ________.

A.the eyewitness is confused by the police’s questions

B.the eyewitness is shown photos of many similar faces

C.the eyewitness lacks the professional help from police

D.the eyewitness can’t identify people of other races clearly.小题3:An inaccurate eyewitness testimony may lead to________.

A.the misunderstanding of the case

B.the disbelief in the court

C.the disrespect for the eyewitness

D.the conviction of an innocent person小题4:Eyewitness testimony is important because ___________.

A.it can be relied on to detect criminals in all cases.

B.it is sometimes the only way to resolve court cases.

C.it is sometimes the only clue for police investigation.

D.it is more reliable than physical evidences to a crime.小题5: According to the text, we can infer that ________.

A.eyewitness testimony is valuable, though sometimes incorrect.

B.police identification is more reliable than that of the ordinary people

C.crime victims often fail to give positive identification of the suspects

D.the jury relies on the judge than the eyewitness for a decision