问题 阅读理解

                                                                              A

Everywhere I go, people are speaking on their cell telephones regardless of their surroundings (环境) . This happens when people are walking around a lake or through town, or even driving. I have even seen a person attempting to speak on her cell phone while ordering ice cream at Dairy Queen, thus speaking to two people at once.

As the over-spending of technology increases, people begin to take less joy in the simple pleasures of life—joys that don’t cost money—from observing clouds, playing with children to thinking or reading. And it is not just telephones that take the responsibility; too much value is placed on items (物品) from computers to cars. Many things are purchased (购买) merely(仅仅) to show off. Do you really need a cell phone that plays games, shows movies and takes pictures? No, cell phones should be purchased to use in urgent situations.You do not need to use your telephone when you are at someone else’s house or in a restaurant.

Technology and possessions (财产) do not bring joy. While some technology is necessary, it can get ridiculous(可笑的). Each possession just makes us want more, while simple pleasures can be enjoyed now and then.

Instead of spending our time buying a third television or looking into the newest cell phone models, we should be acting more productively to improve the world by volunteering, for example. Or, we should reconsider playing computer games or taking pictures on our cell phones and read a book or imagine what shapes the clouds are in the sky instead.

小题1:The author mentions cell phones at the beginning just to show _________.

A.they can be used on any occasion.

B.people manage to speak to two at a time.

C.they can put drivers in great danger.

D.people are fond of personal items.小题2:People have less joy of simple life nowadays mainly because they _________.

A.focus on technology and their belongings.

B.use cell phones in less urgent situations.

C.buy private cars just to show off.

D.place too much value on computers.小题3:We can infer that ________.

A.people have no time to play with their children.

B.we can take pleasure in using cell phones at any time.

C.people always desire more possessions.

D.we depend on volunteers to develop the world.

答案

小题1:D

小题2:A

小题3:C

题目分析:本文说明了随着科学技术的发展,人们为了炫耀,不管有没有实际用途,就去买很多奢侈品。在人们盲目的追求物质享受的同时,却忘却了简单的快乐。

小题1:通过阅读全文内容,以及Many things are purchased (购买) merely(仅仅) to show off.可知文章开头提到手机想要说人们热衷于个人物品,故选D。

小题2:根据Technology and possessions (财产) do not bring joy.故选A。

小题3:根据Each possession just makes us want more,故选C。

点评:这篇文章非常简单,关键在于理解文章内容,不难选出答案。

单项选择题
阅读理解

阅读理解。

     Twenty-first century humanity has mapped oceans and mountains, visited the moon, and surveyed the

planets. But for all the progress, people still don't know one another very well.

     That brings about Theodore Zeldin's "feast of conversations"- events where individuals pair with persons

they don't know for three hours of guided talk designed to get past "Where are you from?"

     Mr. Zeldin, an Oxford University professor, heads Oxford Muse, a 10-year-old foundation based on the

idea that what people need is not more information, but more inspiration and encouragement.

     The "feast" in London looks not at politics or events, but at how people have felt about work, relations

among the sexes, hopes and fears, enemies and authority, the shape of their lives. The "menu of conversation"

includes topics like," How have your priorities (优先考虑的事) changed over the years?" Or, "What have you

rebelled against in the past?"

     As participants gathered, Zeldin opened with a speech: that despite instant communications in a globalized

age, issues of the human heart remain. Many people are lonely, or in routines that discourage knowing the

depth of one another. "We are trapped in shallow conversations and the whole point now is to think, which is

sometimes painful," he says. "But thinking interaction is what separates us the from the other species, except

maybe dogs...who do have generations of human interactions."

     The main rules of the "feast": Don't pair with someone you know or ask questions you would not answer.

The only awkward moment came when the multi-racial crowd of young adults to seniors, in sun hats, ties and

dresses, looked to see whom they would be "intimate" with for hours. But 15 minutes later, everyone was

seated and talking, continuing full force until organizers interrupted them 180 minutes later.

     "It is encouraging to see the world is not just a place of oppression and distance from each other," Zeldin

summed up. "What we did is not ordinary, but it can't be madder than the world already is."

     Some said they felt "liberated" to talk on sensitive topics. Peter, from East London, said that "it might take

weeks or months to get to the level of interaction we suddenly opened up."

1. What can the "conversations" be best described as?

A. Deep and one-on-one.

B. Sensitive and mad.

C. Instant and inspiring.

D. Ordinary and encouraging.

2. In a "feast of conversations",participants ____.

A. pair freely with anyone they like

B. have a guided talk for a set period of time

C. ask questions they themselves would not answer

D. wear clothes reflecting multi-racial features.

3. In paragraph 6, "they would be 'intimate '" is closest in meaning to "_____".

A. they would have physical contact

B. they would have in-depth talks

C. they would be close friends

D. they would exchange basic information

4. From the passage, we can conclude that what Zeldin does is _____.

A. an attempt to promote thinking interaction

B. one of the maddest activities ever conducted

C. a try to liberate people from old-fashioned ideas

D. an effort to give people a chance of talking freely