问题 阅读理解

阅读理解。

     We have seen that pesticides (杀虫剂) now pollute soil, water and food, and that they have the power to

make our rivers fishless and our gardens and woodlands silent and birdless. Man, however much he may like

to pretend the opposite, is part of nature. Can he escape a pollution that is now so thoroughly spread

throughout our world?

     We know that even single exposure to these chemicals, if the amount is large enough, can cause extremely

severe poisoning. But this is not the major problem. The sudden illness or death of farmers, farm workers and

others exposed to enough quantities of pesticides is very sad and should not happen. For the population as a

whole, we must pay more attention to the delayed effects of taking in small amounts of the pesticides that

unseeably pollute our world.

     Responsible public health officials have pointed out that the biological effects of chemicals are increasing in

amount over long periods of time, and that the danger to the man may depend on the amount of the exposures

received throughout his lifetime. For these very reasons people easily take no notice of the danger. It is human

nature to shake off what may seem to us a future disaster. "Men are naturally most impressed by diseases

which have obvious signs," says a wise physician, Dr. Rene Dubos, "yet some of their worst enemies slowly

come near them unnoticed."

62. Which of the following can best summarize the first paragraph of this passage?

A. Man has a responsibility to bear for what has happened to nature.

B. Possibly man will escape the effects of environmental pollution.

C. Pesticide-caused pollution may also kill people.

D. Man acts as if he did not belong to nature.

2. People do not give enough attention to the delayed effects of exposure to chemicals because _____.

A. limited exposure to them does little harm to people's health

B. the present is more important to them than the future

C. humans are able to bear small amounts of poisoning

D. the danger does not become seen clearly and immediately

3. Which of the following statements is true according to the passage?

A. A person exposed to pesticides even once may get seriously poisoned.

B. Birds are less sensitive to pesticides than humans.

C. The effects of pesticides on humans do not last as long as on fish.

D. Taking in small amounts of pesticides will not cause serious results.

4. We can conclude from what Dr Dubos says that _____.

A. people usually find hidden diseases difficult to deal with

B. people fail to notice hidden dangers caused by pesticides

C. diseases with obvious signs are mostly easy to cure

D. attacks by hidden enemies are likely to be deadly

答案

1-4 CDAB

单项选择题
阅读理解

Have you ever been at a meeting while someone was making a speech and realized suddenly that your mind was a million miles away? You probably felt sorry and made up your mind to pay attention and always have been told that daydreaming is a waste of time. 

“On the contrary,” says L. Giambra, an expert in psychology, “daydreaming is quite necessary. Without it, the mind couldn’t get done all the thinking it has to do during a normal day. You can’t possibly do all your thinking with a conscious(有意识)mind. Instead, your unconscious mind is working out problems all the time. Daydreaming then may be one way that the unconscious and conscious states of mind have silent dialogues.”

Early experts in psychology paid no attention to the importance of daydreams or even considered them harmful. At one time daydreaming was thought to be a cause of some mental illnesses. They did not have a better understanding of daydreams until the late 1980s. Eric Klinger, a professor of psychology, is the writer of the book Daydreaming. Klinger says, “We know now that daydreaming is one of the main ways that we organize our lives, learn from our experiences, and plan for our futures. Daydreams really are a window on the things we fear and the things we long for in life.”

Daydreams are usually very simple and direct, quite unlike sleep dreams, which may be hard to understand. It’s easier to gain a deep understanding of your life by paying close attention to your daydreams than by trying to examine your sleep dreams carefully. Daydreams help you recognize the difficult situations in your life and find out a possible way of dealing with them.

Daydreams cannot be predicated(预料). They move off in unexpected directions which may be creative and full of ideas. For many famous artists and scientists, daydreams were and are a main source of creative energy.

72.The writer of this passage considers daydreams         .

A.hard to understand B.important and helpful

C.harmful and unimportant D.the same as sleep dreams

73.The writer quoted(引用)L. Giambra and Eric Klinger to         .

A.point out the wrong ideas of early experts   B.list two different ideas

C.support his own idea                    D.report the latest research on daydreams

74.Which of the following is TRUE?

A.An unconscious mind can work all the problems out.

B.Daydreaming can give artists and scientists ideas for creation.

C.Professor Eric Klinger has a better idea than L. Giambra.

D.Early experts fully understood what daydreams were.

75.What is the main difference between daydreams and sleep dreams?

A.People have daydreams and sleep dreams at different times.

B.Daydreams are the result of unconscious mind while sleep dreams are that of conscious

mind.

C.Daydreams are more harmful.  D.Daydreams are more helpful in solving problems.