问题 不定项选择

张先生为A上市企业董事,并且在该企业任职,2014年取得以下收入:

(1)张先生每月取得工资6000元,12月份取得董事费收入6800元,另外12月取得全年一次性奖金36000元;(2)通过拍卖行将一幅珍藏多年的名人字画拍卖,取得收入58000元,当初为购买字画支付35000元;

(3)从4月1日开始按市场价格出租一套居民住房,每月收取租金10000元(仅考虑房产税,不考虑其他税费);

(4)从A国取得股息所得(税前)折合人民币8000元,已在A国缴纳个人所得税400元;从B国取得特许权使用费所得(税前)人民币60000元,已在B国缴纳个人所得税11000元;

(5)3月份企业实行股票期权计划,3月8日,企业授予张先生股票期权30000股,授予价人民币2.5元/股;该期权无公开市场价格,并约定2014年11月8日起可以行权,行权前不得转让。11月8日张先生以授予价购买股票30000股,当日该股票的每股公开市场价格为人民币4元;

(6)张先生10月因营销业绩突出从兼职的公司取得免费欧洲十国旅游奖励,价值150000元。

根据上述资料,回答下列问题:

张先生取得C公司免费旅游奖励应缴纳个人所得税额为()元。

A.43000

B.54000

C.41000

D.58000

答案

参考答案:C

解析:

1.个人在公司(包括关联公司)任职、受雇,同时兼任董事、监事的,应将董事费、监事费与个人工资收入合并,统一按工资、薪金所得项目缴纳个人所得税。1~11月工资薪金所得应纳个人所得税=[(6000-3500)×10%-105]×11=1595(元)12月份工资薪金所得应纳个人所得税=(6000+6800-3500)×25%-1005=1320(元)年终一次性奖金应纳个人所得税的计算:36000÷12=3000(元),适用税率10%,速算扣除数是105元。应纳个人所得税=36000×10%-105=3495(元)全年工资薪金所得应缴纳的个人所得税=1595+1320+3495=6410(元)

2.转让名人字画应缴纳的个人所得税=(58000-35000)×20%=4600(元)

3.对于出租住房按10%税率交个人所得税;出租住房全年应缴纳的个人所得税=(10000-10000×4%)×(1-20%)×10%×9=6912(元)。

4.①来自A国所得的抵免限额=8000×20%=1600(元)在A国实际缴纳个人所得税400元,应补缴个人所得税=1600-400=1200(元)。②来自B国所得的抵免限额=60000×(1-20%)×20%=9600(元),已在B国缴纳个人所得税11000元,超过了抵免限额9600元,超限额部分不允许在应纳税额中抵扣,但可在以后纳税年度仍来自B国的所得已纳税额低于限额部分中补扣。③应补缴个人所得税合计1200元。

5.对因特殊情况,员工在行权日之前将股票期权转让的,以股票期权的转让净收入,作为"工资薪金所得"征收个人所得税。股票期权所得应缴纳个人所得税=[30000×(4-2.5)÷8×20%-555]×8=4560(元)

6.企业和单位对其营销业绩突出的非雇员以培训班、研讨会、工作考察等名义组织旅游活动,通过免收差旅费、旅游费对个人实行的营销业绩奖励(包括实物、有价证券等),应根据所发生费用的全额作为该营销人员当期的劳务收入,按照"劳务报酬所得"项目征收个人所得税,并由提供上述费用的企业和单位代扣代缴。张先生应纳个人所得税额=150000×(1-20%)×40%-7000=41000(元)

单项选择题

Passage Two

The idea of building "New Towns" to absorb growth is frequently considered a cure-all for urban problems. It is wrongly assumed that if new residents can be diverted from existing centers, the present urban situation at least will get no worse. It is further and equally wrongly assumed that since European New Towns have been financially and socially successful, we can expect the same sorts of results in the United States.
Present planning, thinking, and legislation will not produce the kinds of New Town that have been successful abroad. It will multiply suburbs or encourage developments in areas where land is cheap and construction profitable rather than where New Towns are genuinely needed.
Such ill-considered projects not only will fail to relieve pressures on existing cities but will, in fact, tend to weaken those cities further by drawing away high-income citizens and increasing the concentration of low-income groups that are unable to provide tax income. The remaining taxpayers, accordingly, will face increasing burdens, and industry and commerce will seek escape. Unfortunately, this mechanism is already at work in some metropolitan areas.
The promoters of New Towns so far in the United States have been developers, builders, and financial institutions. The main interest of these promoters is economic gain. Furthermore, federal regulations designed to promote the New Town idea do not consider social needs as the European New Town plans do. In fact, our regulations specify virtually all the ingredients of the typical suburban community, with a bit of political rhetoric (修辞) thrown in.
A workable American New Town formula should be established as firmly here as the national formula was in Britain. All possible social and governmental innovations as well as financial factors should be thoroughly considered and accommodated (容纳) in this policy. Its objectives should be clearly stated, and both incentives and penalties should be provided to ensure that the objectives are pursued. If such a policy is developed, then the New Town approach can play an important role in alleviating America’s urban problems.

The success of the New Town approach lies in the fact that ______.

A.penalties will be given to those who are only interested in economic gain

B.a policy with clear objectives will be developed

C.promoters of New Towns will be encouraged

D.governmental innovations and financial factors will be thoroughly considered

单项选择题