问题 材料题

阅读下列材料并回答问题。

材料一:1848年戴贺胥任印度总督后,炮制了“丧失权利论”。根据这个理论,王公死后如无直系后嗣,他们的领地和年金均收归东印度公司。萨塔拉、那格蒲尔、占西等10多个土邦因此被公司兼并。1856年,戴贺胥又以治理不善为名,吞并了奥德王公的领土。随后又以种种借口剥夺了马拉特王公那那·萨希布领取年金的继承权,剥夺了印度教和伊斯兰教寺院的大量土地。——摘自吴于廑、齐世荣《世界史·近代史编》

 材料二:1858年8月,英国议会通过“改善印度管理法”,取消徒具形式的东印度公司,由英国女王直接管理(1877年初,英国女王加冕为印度女皇),11月1日,印度总督坎宁公布了英国维多利亚女王的诏书,宣布不再侵犯印度封建王公的利益和特权。……同时,进行军事改革,减少英印军队中的土兵比重,增加英籍士兵人数,并大量从印度少数 民族中征兵。

材料三:英国女王1858年11月1日文告(节录):……朕对于当地王公的权利、尊严和荣誉,如同对于朕自己王权一样,加以尊重。 …… 对于其他一切以武装反对政府的人,朕于此特允无条件宽恕、特赦和大赦其对于朕躬、朕的王权和尊严所犯的一切罪行,只要他们回家和从事正常的工作。——以上两则材料摘自《世界近代现代史教学参考书》

(1)材料一的统治政策导致的后果是什么?为什么?

_______________________________________________________________

(2)依据材料二和材料三说明英国的统治政策发生了怎样的变化?归纳其内容(不得摘抄材料原句)。

_______________________________________________________________

答案

(1)印度民族大起义的爆发。原因:英国的殖民政策,加剧了下层人民的苦难,剥夺封建王公的权利,也导致封建王公的不满和抵制,最终激起了印度全民族的不满与反抗。

(2)①改变殖民政策,撤消东印度公司,由英王直接统治。②安抚封建王公,保留王公的权利。③进行军事改革,调整军队构成比例。④赦免参加起义人员,缓解英国与印度的民族矛盾。

单项选择题

Researchers at the University of Arizona, led by Teresa Cummins, conducted an exploratory study on the online learning modules, designed to supplement hands-on classes taught by local experts and supported by an overview text, to help users increase their understanding of key concepts in the Arizona Master Watershed Steward program. They also sought to determine whether program participants would use the non-compulsory modules.

Their evaluation revealed that module users increased their understanding of key watershed concepts; participants in the evaluation demonstrated a 30 percent increase in content knowledge following module use. Additionally, 70 percent of participants retained this knowledge through a two-month follow-up test.

A follow-up survey showed that approximately half of the participants returned to the online modules on their own; several of these users returned several times and spent multiple hours per session. Comments from the follow-up survey suggested that the users accessed the site either as they had the time or as they needed the information.

Online usage statistics indicated participants continued to visit the site for many months following the modules’ release and advertisement. Though many visits were very brief (a single pageview; only a couple of seconds), visitors with many returns to the site and/or long visits appeared to be working through the modules.

One participant stated, "My brain can only hold so much information; the modules keep information on-hand." Other participants commented that the modules were "more interesting and interactive" than the text material, and a "very effective tool" and "a great resource to the Master Watershed Steward community."

The Arizona Master Watershed Steward program, sponsored by University of Arizona, prepares adults to serve as volunteers in the conservation of water resources and the protection, restoration, and monitoring of their watersheds. The modules were intended to reinforce concepts covered in classes and further engage participants in the learning process.

One key finding was that the modules were not clearly preferred by users over in-person instruction. One participant stated, "For me, they are just another avenue for learning, a supplement or additional reference. I prefer in person and real hands-on learning." Other participants similarly expressed their desire for hands-on and face-to-face interaction. Several participants noted that the usefulness of in-person lectures—was a function of the presenter.

Overall, the exploratory evaluation indicated that the modules were a welcome supplement to the course and were effective in reinforcing key concepts. Participants retained knowledge for several weeks, although since subjects were self-selected, they may have been self-motivated to pay attention and master the online module materials.

"I am constantly searching for new ways to educate our program’s diverse audiences and reinforce watershed science concepts, " says Candice Rupprecht, state coordinator for the Master Watershed Steward program. "I am excited to know that online learning modules can enhance our program by offering additional independent learning opportunities for our volunteers.

From the second paragraph, we can infer that()

A. learners might make no progress without the online modules

B. learners are conscientious in memorizing the content knowledge

C. learners gained improvement in their study by using the online modules

D. 70 percent of program participants took the follow-up test

问答题 简答题