问题 阅读理解

ROME: The legend of Leonardo da Vinci is covered in mystery: How did he die?Are the remains buried in a French castle really those of the master? Was the "Mona Lisa" a self-portrait in disguise (伪装)?

A group of Italian scientists believe the key to solving those puzzles lies with the remains, and they say they are seeking permission to dig up the body to conduct carbon and DNA testing.

If the skull is undamaged, the scientists can go to the heart of a question that has fascinated scholars and the public for centuries: the identity of the "Mona Lisa." Recreating a virtual and then physical reconstruction of Leonardo's face, they can compare it with the smiling face in the painting.

"We don't know what we'll find if the tomb is opened. We could even just find grains and dust," says Giorgio Gruppioni, an anthropologist who is participating in the project. "But if the remains are well kept, they are a biological record of events in a person's life, and sometimes in their death." Silvano Vinceti, the leader of the group, said that he plans to press his case with the French officials in charge of the said burial site at Amboise Castle early next week.

Leonardo moved to France at the invitation of King Francis I, who named him "first painter to the king." He spent the last three years of his life there, and died in 1519 at age 67. The artist's original burial place, the palace church of Saint Florentine, was destroyed during the French Revolution and remains that are believed to be his were eventually reburied in the Saint-Hubert Chapel near the castle.

"The Amboise tomb is a symbolic tomb; it's a big question mark," said Alessandro Vezzosi, the director of a museum dedicated to Leonardo in his hometown of Vinci. Vezzosi said that investigating the tomb could help identify the artist's bones with certainty and solve other questions, such as the cause of his death. He said he asked to open the tomb in 2004 to study the remains, but the Amboise Castle turned him down.

The group of 100 experts involved in the project, called the National Committee for Historical and Artistic Heritage, was created in 2003 with the aim of "solving the great mysteries of the past," said Vinceti, who has written books on art and literature.

Arguably the world's most famous painting, the "Mona Lisa" hangs in the Louvre in Paris, where it drew some 8.5 million visitors last year. Mystery has surrounded the identity of the painting's subject for centuries, with opinions ranging from the wife of a Florentine merchant to Leonardo's own mother.

That Leonardo intended the "Mona Lisa" as a self-portrait in disguise is a possibility that has interested and divided scholars. Theories have existed: Some think that Leonardo's taste for tricks and riddles might have led him to hide his own identity behind that puzzling smile; others have guessed that the painting hid an androgynous lover.

If granted access to the grave site, the Italian experts plan to use a tiny camera and radar to confirm the presence of bones. The scientists would then exhume (挖掘) the remains and attempt to date the bones with carbon testing.

At the heart of the proposed study is the effort to discover whether the remains are actually Leonardo's, including with DNA testing.

Vezzosi questions the DNA comparison, saying he is unaware of any direct descendants (后代) of Leonardo or of tombs that could be attributed with certainty to the artist's close relatives.

Gruppioni said that DNA from the bones could also eventually be compared to DNA found elsewhere. For example, Leonardo is thought to have rubbed colors on the canvas with his thumb, possibly using saliva (唾液), meaning DNA might be found on his paintings.

Even in the absence of DNA testing, other tests could provide useful information, including whether the bones belonged to a man or a woman, and whether the person died young or old.

Even within the committee, experts are divided over the identity of the "Mona Lisa."

Vinceti believes that a tradition of considering the self-portrait to be not just a faithful imitation of one's features but a representation of one's spiritual identity may have resonated (共鸣) with Leonardo.

Vezzosi, the museum director, dismissed as "baseless and senseless" the idea that the "Mona Lisa" could be a self-portrait of Leonardo. He said most researchers believe the woman may have been either a wife of the artist's sponsor, the Florentine nobleman Giuliano de Medici, or Lisa Gherardini, the wife of a rich silk merchant, Francesco del Giocondo. The traditional view is that the name "Mona Lisa" comes from the silk merchant's wife, as well as its Italian name: "La Gioconda."  

小题1:   Where is this passage most probably taken from?

A.A magazine.

B.A newspaper.

C.A textbook.

D.A research report.小题2:   Why does the author ask a couple of questions in the beginning?

A.To arouse the interest of readers.

B.To puzzle Italian scientists.

C.To answer the questions himself.

D.To make fun of French officials.小题3:   The best title of this story might be “_____”.

A.What Is the Purpose of an Investigation?

B.How Did Leonardo da Vinci Die in France?

C.Are the Remains Really Those of the Master?

D.Did Leonardo Paint Himself as 'Mona Lisa'?小题4:The sentence “he plans to press his case with the French officials” (underlined in Paragraph 4) suggests that Vinceti intends to _____.

A.press the French officials to participate in their project

B.urge the French officials to open the tomb early next week

C.persuade the French officials to allow opening the tomb

D.record events in a person’s life with the French officials小题5:   Which of the following statements is true according to the passage?

A.Scholars have the same opinion on DNA testing.

B.Scientists doubt if the remains are those of da Vinci.

C.The identity of “Mona Lisa” has already been proved.

D.Alessandro Vezzosi got permission to open the tomb.小题6:   We can infer from the last two paragraphs that _____?

A.“Mona Lisa” is the name of the wife of a silk merchant

B.the “Mona Lisa” is a self-portrait of Leonardo da Vinci

C.experts divided the committee into several groups

D.opinions differ of the identity of the “Mona Lisa”

答案

小题1:B小题1:A小题1:D小题1:C小题1:B小题1:D

阅读理解与欣赏

阅读下面的文言文,完成小题。

桂州新城记

王安石

侬智高反南方,出入十有二州。十有二州之守吏,或死或不死,而无一人能守其州者。岂其材皆不足欤?盖夫城郭之不设,甲兵之不戒,虽有智勇,犹不能以胜一日之变也。唯天子亦以为任其罪者不独守吏,故特推恩褒广死节,而一切贷其失职。于是遂推选士大夫所论以为能者,付之经略,而今尚书户部侍郎余公靖当广西焉。

寇平之明年,蛮越接和,乃大城桂州。其方六里,其木、甓、瓦、石之材,以枚数之,至四百万有奇。用人之力,以工数之,至一十馀万。凡所以守之具,无一求而有不给者焉。以至和元年八月始作,而以二年之六月成。夫其为役亦大矣。盖公之信于民也久,而费之欲以卫其材,劳之欲以休其力,以故为是有大费与大劳,而人莫或以为勤也

古者君臣、父子、夫妇、兄弟、朋友之礼失,则夷狄横而窥中国。方是时,中国非无城郭也,卒于陵夷、毁顿、陷灭而不救。然则城郭者,先王有之,而非所以恃而为存也。及至喟然觉寤,兴起旧政,则城郭之修也,又不敢以为后。盖有其患而图之无其具,有其具而守之非其人,有其人而治之无其法,能以久存而无败者,皆未之闻也。故文王之兴也,有四夷之难,则城于朔方,而以南仲;宣王之起也,有诸侯之患,则城于东方,而以仲山甫。此二臣之德,协于其君,于为国之本末与其所先后,可谓知之矣。虑之以悄悄之劳,而发赫赫之名,承之以翼翼之勤,而续明明之功,卒所以攘戎夷而中国以全安者,盖其君臣如此,而守卫之有其具也。

今余公亦以文武之材,当明天子承平日久、欲补弊立废之时,镇抚一方,修捍其民,其勤于今,与周之有南仲、仲山甫盖等矣,是宜有纪也。故其将吏相与谋而来取文,将刻之城隅,而以告后之人焉。至和二年九月丙辰,群牧判官、太常博士王某记。

(选自《王安石散文选集》)

小题1:对下列句子中划线词的解释,不正确的一项是(3分)

A.虽有智勇,犹不能以一日之变也。胜:禁得起。

B.城郭之不设,甲兵之不戒:通“诫”,告诫,警示。

C.于是遂推选士大夫所论以为能者,付之经略。经略:策划处理。

D.承之以翼翼之勤,而续明明之功翼翼:恭敬谨慎的样子。小题2:下列句子中,全都能体现修治新城的原因的一组是(3分)

①天子亦以为任其罪者不独守吏。

②寇平之明年,蛮越接和。

③然则城郭者,先王有之,而非所以恃而为存也。

④有大费与大劳,而人莫或以为勤也。

⑤有其患而图之无其具,有其具而守之非其人。

⑥凡所以守之具,无一求而有不给者焉。

A.①③④

B.①②⑤

C.②③④

D.①④⑥小题3:下列对原文有关内容的分析和概括,不正确的一项是(3分)

A.侬智高在南方起事谋反。十二州守吏,没有一个人能守住城池,不是他们才能不够。当时皇帝也这么认为。

B.君臣、父子、兄弟、夫妇和朋友之间的礼义失去的话,四方的少数民族就会横暴的窥视中原地区,以寻可乘之机。

C.王安石散文叙议结合,阐明道理,深有寓意。本文亦是如此,作者不吝笔墨叙写余靖修建新城的经过,为后文论述奠定了基础。

D.作者认为,城郭为设险故守之需,故不可缺,而礼乃无形之城,对保持国家的长治久安,更不能忽视。小题4:把文中画线的句子翻译成现代汉语。(10分)

(1)    故特推恩褒广死节,而一切贷其失职。(4分)

(2)    以故为是有大费与大劳,而人莫或以为勤也。(3分)

(3)    卒所以攘戎夷而中国以全安者(3分)

单项选择题