问题 多项选择题

If there were an Oscar for most consistently profitable Hollywood studio, it probably would go to 20th Century Fox. Hollywood is a hit-driven business, and most studios bounce from box-office hit to dud with depressing regularity. But for the past seven years, Fox has scored with both blockbusters (Alvin and the Chipmunks) and indie hits (Juno) that have generated the kind of double-digit return on investment you might expect from a business making widget’ s, not films. Tom Pollick, a former Universal Pictures chairman who produces movies for Fox and other studios, says. "Fox is simply the best-run studio in town. "
You were expecting anything less from Rupert Murdoch’s guys At Fox, the mantra is "to be creatively driven but fiscally astute," says James N. Gianopulos, who co-chairs the studio with Thomas Rothman of Fox Filmed Entertainment. Translation. to be almost pathologically obsessed with costs. Not that the co-chairs run from risk. They outbid most of Hollywood in 2004 for the script to the apocalyptic The Day After Tomorrow, but made it for $100 million, relatively cheap for a special-effects picture. It grossed more than half a billion dollars worldwide.
Double-digit profits are rare in Hollywood. Yet for the past six years, Fox has delivered 12% to 18% operating margins. Halfway through its fiscal year, it earned operating income of $ 765 million on nearly $ 3.6 billion in revenues—a 21.5% operating margin. And that doesn’t include Horton Hears a Who!, which grossed a hefty $ 45 million on its Mar. 14 opening weekend and was made for just over $ 85 million, nearly half what an animated Pixar Animation Studios film costs.
"No one in Hollywood negotiates tougher than these guys," says producer John Davis, who made I, Robot and Carfield: A Tale of Two Kitties for Fox. The hardballing starts with development, which Davis says typically costs Fox 10% to 15% less than usual because it holds the line on costly rewrites. On top of that, Fox rarely gives anyone but the biggies— Steven Spielberg, say—a piece of the profits. It also sets tough budgets and sticks with them. For his Lord of the Rings-esque Eragon, Davis had a $100 million budget, which forced him to cut some special effects and limit stars such as John Malkovich to cameos. It earned just $ 75 million domestically but did well globally.
Special effects often eat up an action film’s budget. Not at Fox. The studio learned its lesson 10 yeas ago with Titanic, which cost Fox and Paramount Pictures a then-unthinkable $ 200 million to make. After Titanic, Fox hired an in-house effects czar, whose main job is riding herd on special effects houses, often playing them against each other to get the best price. "They beat you over the head," says X-Men producer Avi Arad. "If it costs $ 30 million, they’ll ask why it can’t cost $ 20 million. " To keep downtime to a minimum, Arad used several shops on Fantastic 4: Rise of the Silver Surfer.
Fox’s biggest hits are its smallest films. Peter Rice runs the studio’s independent unit, Fox Searchlight Pictures, which is in the business of finding tiny films, like Little Miss Sunshine, that were made on a shoestring. Rice’s limit: $15 million. His latest triumph: Juno. It cost $ 7. 5 million to produce and pulled in $135 million-plus in the U. S. alone.
Which brings us to marketing, an expense that has been known to account for one-third of a film’s overall budget. While executives say they pay full freight for ads on Foxe’s farflung global properties, their stars pop up all over. Samudl L. Jackson, who starred in the flick Jumper, walked the carpet at the Super Bowl on the Fox Network. And wasn’t that Jim Carrey, who provided Horton’s voice, recently grinning insanely in the audience of Fox’s megahit American Idol
Fox has stumbled before. Its 2005 picture Kingdom of Heaven bombed in the U. S and cost a very unFoxlike $130 million to make. But even then, Fox turned things around. It had loaded the film with international stars, including Orlando Bloom, so it made enough outside the U.S. to break even.

Explain Gianopulos’ comment that "At fox, the mantra is ’to be creatively driven but fiscally astute’". (para. 2)

答案

参考答案:"mantra". charm or spell used to serve as an instrument of thought/ at Fox, in film production, on one side, creativity is the focus, people/film-makers are urged to make the best films/ on the other, much attention is stressed/put on the strict control of cost/ "tough budgets" are set and to be followed strictly/ to use less money to make the best films / Foxes production of box-office hits over the past seven years shows the implementation of the "mantra\

填空题
单项选择题

夷、夏之称早就出现了。夷、夏之分是地域、语言、生产方式、生活方式和社会风俗之别。这种区别由于经济文化发展的不平衡和长期的对立和战争而逐渐扩大。然而在西周以前,夷、夏之辨不严,夷可以变而为夏,夏也可以变而为夷,商人本来就起源于东夷,而周人起初与西戎也有[千丝万缕]的联系。直到西周春秋时期,戎、狄、夷、蛮不仅散居四裔,而且在中原地区与华夏族(错居杂处)。春秋时期是华夏族的形成时期,夷夏观也就是在这个时期产生的。据《左传》记载,鲁闵公元年(前661),管仲对齐侯说:“戎狄豺狼,不可厌也;诸夏亲昵,不可弃也。”鲁襄公四年(前569),魏绛对晋侯说:“戎,禽兽也,获戎失华,无乃不可乎”又《国语·周语》记载,周襄王十七年(前635),富辰对周襄王说:“狄,豺狼之德也。”又说:“狄,封豕豺狼也,不可厌也。”这些文献中出列的是春秋列国统治者辱骂戎狄为豺狼禽兽的最早记录。这时夷夏关系非常紧张,戎狄一再进攻春秋列国,晋、齐等大国都屡屡遭到戎狄的[侵扰]而不得安宁,以至出现“南夷与北戎交,中国不绝若线”的局面(《春秋公羊传》僖公四年)。正是这种[危如垒卯]的局势激发了春秋列国的华夏民族意识,产生了夷夏观。以上所引的几条材料可以看做夷夏观出现的标志。

夷、夏两族形成的时间是()

A.西周以前

B.春秋以后

C.春秋时期

D.原始社会后期