搜题请搜索小程序“爱下问搜题”
问题 阅读理解与欣赏

小题1:请简述曹操采用“二虎竞食”和“驱虎吞狼”之计离间对手的故事。

小题2:孔明曰：“恐魏兵袭其后也。主上若有失，当投白帝城避之，吾入川时，已伏下十万兵在鱼腹浦矣。”《三国演义》第八十四回

陆逊追到“鱼腹浦”时遇见诸葛亮布下的什么阵？结果如何？请简述。

答：第（  ）题：                                         

                                                          。

答案

小题1:要点：①曹操采用谋士荀彧“二虎竞食”之计。②奏请诏命实授刘备为徐州牧，并附密信让刘备杀吕布。③刘备不忍杀吕布，此计失败。④曹操接着采用“驱虎吞狼”之计，向袁术通报说刘备欲吞其州县，又明诏刘备讨袁术。⑤导致刘、袁两方交战

小题2:遇见了“八阵图”。陆逊追袭刘备到了鱼腹浦，见前方杀气冲天，便怀疑有埋伏。打听之后才知道，诸葛亮入川时曾于此堆石列阵。陆逊轻敌，误从“死门”进入石阵，却陷于阵中出不来。后来，陆逊等人在黄承彦的指引下，才逃出石阵，并从黄承彦口中知道，诸葛亮早已预知会有东吴大将迷于阵中

题目分析：叙述时要结合着原作品《三国演义》相关的故事情节，用简练的概括性的语言，从人物，事件，结果三个方面进行组织答案。如在叙述“曹操采用“二虎竞食”和“驱虎吞狼”之计”时，可以用“曹操（人物）+授刘备杀吕布失败，又采用“驱虎吞狼”之计（事件）+导致刘、袁两方交战（结果）”的句式进行组织答案。再如，叙述陆逊追袭刘备到了鱼腹浦时，可用陆逊（人物）+陷入八卦阵（事件）+后来在黄承彦的指引下，才逃出石阵（结果）。这种句式来组织答案。

单项选择题

Is there any evidence that the standard of English as a foreign language has improved in the years since the Second World War Naturally, as it is the world language, more and more people are taught it and use it. But do they speak it or write it or understand it better than their parents’ or grandparents’ generations
Have standards declined There is no objective way of answering this question. Tests of the traditional sort- compositions, precis writing, and so on--have always been subjective, so they cannot be used to judge whether people have got better or not over the years. But so-called objective tests are useless as a measure of progress too. They have not been used consistently in the same "concentration" over the period they have been in use, so there is no way of comparing exams "now" and "then". Moreover, usually in the form of multiple choice questions, they do not, by and large, test the things that really count in mastering a language. Even comprehension is a partly "creative" activity in real life, as we have to think of possible meanings for ourselves rather than have them suggested for us from outside. And people can be trained in the techniques of multiple choice, while others fail the tests because they have been led astray precisely by their "suggestive" nature, so they are not really objective at all. Weare left with only personal impression to go on.
My own is that, if anything, standards have declined somewhat in the last thirty or forty years, despite all the new theories, tools and techniques that have been developed. I am not alone in this judgment. In Sweden, for instance, Professors Johannes Hedberg and Gustav Korlen, two of the most experienced workers in the field; have on several occasions drawn attention to the lack of progress in the teaching of foreign languages since the late fifties. Yet Sweden is a sophisticated society with extremely high educational and academic standards, and very concerned not to be cut off from the rest of the world. If such a country cannot achieve advances in the study of foreign languages, it is unlikely that many, if any, others have done so.
Japan is another community where remarkably little progress has been made in the learning of English. It is probably as important for Japan as for Sweden to master that language, and there is much academic effort put into linguistic research of various kinds. Yet the average standard of language learning is abysmally low, particularly for such a highly literate and educated society. This is no doubt in part the result of a vicious circle: many of the professors of English at Japanese universities are themselves incapable of speaking or writing or even understanding the language well.

Which of the following is TRUE according to the passage

A. Multiple choice questions are objective because people cannot be trained any techniques.
B. Sweden emphasizes the teaching of English without paying attention to other countries.
C. We have to depend on our own impression to judge the English standards.
D. Compositions are useful to test people’s English ability because people have to write out their viewpoints.
查看答案
单项选择题 A2型题

患者，男，50岁。患肝硬化多年，近13尿量骤减，腹部胀大如鼓，饮食精神尚可。用药宜首选（）

A.大腹皮

B.冬瓜皮

C.桑白皮

D.甘遂

E.葶苈子
查看答案