问题 阅读理解

Ban Fur? Then Why Not Leather?

Much to the displeasure of some local businesses, the City Council in West Hollywood, California, voted without opposition last week to ban the sale of fur products. Should laws be involved in this issue? Is it unfair to ban sales of fur, but not sales of leather and hides (兽皮)?

Animals Do Not Have Rights

By Tibor R. Machan

My view is that animals do not have basic rights. It is a matter of ethics (伦理学) and not of the laws of human societies. If animals had such rights as human beings do, they would have to be held responsible for killing fellow animals in the wild. That way of thinking about animals makes a category mistake. Using animals, including their fur or organs, to improve people's lives is acceptable.

A Small Step Against Cruelty

By Kate Carter

Both fur and leather are the skins of dead animals. Why should we think that the lovable furry ones deserve more of a life than the less pleasing ones? Some say leather is  less cruel because it's a byproduct (副产品) of the meat industry. But this isn't really true. Some cheap leather may be a byproduct of the meat industry, but often it's the other way round. In South Africa, where there is a developing market for ostrich(鸵鸟)farms, the skins account for roughly 80 percent of the slaughtered (宰杀)birds' value, a mere 20 percent of which comes from the meat.

"Who" Are You Wearing?

By Marc Bekoff

West Hollywood's ban is a move in the right direction. However, we must work to ban the sales of leather and hides, too. Furs come from animals who are attacked to become clothing, while some leather and hides come from slaughterhouse(屠宰场) animals. We must remember that when people choose to wear fur, leather and hides, they are wearing formering conscious beings. So it's a matter of who they are wearing, not what they are wearing because these animals must be referred to as who and not what or that.

小题1:What is the passage mainly about?

A.West Hollywood's ban on fur products.

B.Differences between fur and leather sales.

C.The government's role in protecting animals.

D.The ecological imbalance in West Hollywood.小题2:Tibor R. Machan seems to believe that         .

A.laws should be passed to protect animals

B.humans are respornsible for killing animals

C.it is not reasonable to use animals to improve life

D.animals and humans aren't supposed to share equal rights小题3:What is Kate Carter's opinion about wearing fur and wearing leather?

A.Both are decided by the meat industry.

B.There is little distinction (区别) between them.

C.Wearing fur is generally more acceptable.

D.Wearing leather is cheaper than wearing fur.小题4:What is Marc Bekoff’s attitude towards sales of fur?

A.Sympathetic.

B.Careless.

C.Tolerant.

D.Opposed.

答案

小题1:A

小题2:D

小题3:B

小题4:D 

文章是关于人们对West Hollywood禁止羽毛产品这个禁令的讨论。

小题1:A 主旨大意题。文章是关于人们对West Hollywood禁止羽毛产品这个禁令的讨论。

小题2:D 细节题。根据他的论点My view is that animals do not have basic rights.可知D正确。

小题3:B 推理题。根据本部分的Both fur and leather are the skins of dead animals. Why should we think that the lovable furry ones deserve more of a life than the less pleasing ones?可知他认为wearing fur and wearing leather之间的差异是很小的。B正确。

小题4:D 推理题。根据本部分However, we must work to ban the sales of leather and hides, too.可知他是持反对态度的,他认为皮制品也应该被禁止。故D正确。

单项选择题
阅读理解与欣赏

阅读下文,完成文后各题。

郅都者,杨人也。以郎事孝文帝。孝景时,都为中郎将,敢直谏,面折大臣于朝。尝从入上林,贾姬如厕,野彘卒入厕。上目都,都不行。上欲自持兵救贾姬,都伏上前曰:“陛下纵自轻,奈宗庙太后何!”上还,彘亦去。太后闻之,赐都金百斤,由此重郅都。

济南瞷氏宗人三百余家,豪猾,二千石莫能制,于是景帝乃拜都为济南太守。至则族灭瞷氏首恶,余皆股栗。居岁余,郡中不拾遗。旁十余郡守畏都如大府。

都为人勇,有气力,公廉,不发私书,问遗无所受,请寄无所听。常自称曰:“已倍亲而仕,身固当奉职死节官下,终不顾妻子矣。”

郅都迁为中尉。丞相条侯至贵倨也,而都揖丞相。是时民朴,畏罪自重,而都独先严酷,行法不避贵戚,列侯宗室见都侧面而视,号曰“苍鹰”。

临江王征诣中尉府对簿,临江王欲得刀笔为书谢上,而都禁吏不予。魏其侯使人以间与临江王。临江王既为书谢上,因自杀。窦太后闻之,怒,以危法中都,都免归家。孝景帝乃使使持节拜都为雁门太守,而便道之官,得以便宜从事。匈奴素闻郅都节,居边,为引兵去,竟郅都死不近雁门。匈奴尝为偶人像郅都,令骑驰射莫能中,见惮如此。匈奴患之。窦太后乃竟中都以汉法。景帝曰:“都忠臣。”欲释之。窦太后曰:“临江王独非忠臣邪?”于是遂斩郅都。

(节选自《史记•郅都传》)

小题1:对下列句子中加点词语的解释,不正确的一项是

A.上目都,都不行目:用眼睛示意

B.问遗无所受遗:赠送

C.魏其侯使人以间与临江王间:离间

D.见惮如此惮:害怕小题2:下列句子分别编为四组,全都直接表现郅都奉公尽职的一组是

①敢直谏,面折大臣于朝

②陛下纵自轻,奈宗庙太后何

③丞相条侯至贵倨也,而都揖丞相

④问遗无所受,请寄无所听

⑤至则族灭瞷氏首恶,余皆股栗

⑥而便道之官,得以便宜从事

A.①④⑥

B.②③⑤

C.③④⑥

D.①②⑤小题3:下列对原文有关内容的叙述和分析,不正确的一项是

A.在贾姬遇到危难的时候,郅都不但自己没有去救贾姬,还劝阻皇上以国家大局为重。此事深得窦太后赏识。

B.郅都深得景帝的信任。窦太后因临江王自杀而想降罪郅都时,景帝还称他是忠臣来为他求情。

C.郅都能严格执法。任济南太守时敢于诛杀头号恶人,震慑了其他坏人。一年后,社会风气大为好转。

D.匈奴人制做了郅都的木偶像,让骑兵在马上用箭去射,但骑兵都惧怕郅都,无人敢执行命令。