问题 问答题

某实施监理的工程,建设单位与甲施工单位签订施工合同,约定的承包范围包括A、B、C、D、E五个子项目,其中,子项目A包括拆除废弃建筑物和新建工程两部分,拆除废弃建筑物分包给具有相应资质的乙施工单位。
工程实施过程中发生如下事件:
事件1:由于拆除废弃建筑物的危险性较大,乙施工单位编制了专项施工方案,并组织召开了有甲施工单位与项目监理机构相关人员参加的专家论证会。会后,乙施工单位将该施工方案送交项目监理机构,要求总监理工程师审批。总监理工程师认为该方案已通过专家论证,便签字同意实施。
事件2:建设单位要求乙施工单位在废弃建筑物拆除前7日内,将资质等级证明与专项施工方案报送工程所在地建设行政主管部门。
事件3:受金融危机影响,建设单位于2010年1月20日正式通知甲施工单位与监理单位缓建尚未施工的子项目D、E。而此前,甲施工单位已按照批准的计划订购了用于子项目D、E的设备,并支付定金300万元。鉴于无法确定复工时间,建设单位于2010年2月10日书面通知甲施工单位解除施工合同。
问题:

指出事件1中的不妥之处,写出正确做法。

答案

参考答案:事件1的不妥之处及正确做法:
(1)不妥之处:乙施工单位将专项施工方案送交项目监理机构。
正确做法:应由甲施工单位将专项施工方案送交项目监理机构。
(2)不妥之处:总监理工程师认为专项施工方案已通过专家论证,便签字同意实施。
正确做法:专项施工方案应经施工单位技术负责人、总监理工程师签字后实施。

单项选择题
问答题

When workers become more efficient, it’s normally a good thing. But lately, it has acted as a powerful brake on job creation. And the question of whether the recent surge in productivity has run its course is the key to whether job growth is finally poised to take off.

One of the great surprises of the economic downturn that began 27 months ago is this.. Businesses are producing only 3 percent fewer goods and services than they were at the end of 2007, yet Americans are working nearly 10 percent fewer hours because of a mix of layoffs and cutbacks in the workweek.

(46) That means high-level gains in productivity--which in the long run is the key to a higher standard of living but in the short run contributes to sky-high unemployment. So long as employers can squeeze dramatically higher output from every worker, they won’t need to hire again despite the growing economy.

(47) On Friday, the Labor Department will release a closely watched March employment report expected to show the pest job growth in three years, driven by stabilization in the economy and a rebound from February snowstorms.

A p March job-growth number-at a time when the economy is growing at only a middling pace--would suggest that the productivity boom has largely run its course. (48) Regardless, the question of what caused the burst in workers’ efficiency is one of the great unanswered questions of the expansion and has huge stakes for the economy over the coming year.

"It is an episode that we’re going to--we, economists in general--are going to want to understand better and look at for a long time," Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said at a hearing last week in which he described the productivity gains as "extraordinary" and acknowledged he had not foreseen them.

(49) Businesses have certainly not been investing in new equipment that might enable workers to be more efficient-capital expenditures plummeted during the recession and are rebounding slowly. (50) And the structural shifts occurring in the economy are so profound that one would expect productivity to be lower, rather than higher, as people need new training to work in parts of the economy that are growing, such as exports and the clean-energy sector.

So what’s happening As best as anyone can guess, the crisis that began in 2007 and deepened in 2008 caused both businesses and workers to panic.

(50) And the structural shifts occurring in the economy are so profound that one would expect productivity to be lower, rather than higher, as people need new training to work in parts of the economy that are growing, such as exports and the clean-energy sector.