问题

星期一,A老师埋怨地说:“孩子在家过了一个双休日,再回到幼儿园后,许多良好的行为习惯就退步了,不认真吃饭,乱扔东西,活动时喜欢说话,真不知孩子在家时,家长是怎么教育的!”站在一旁的B老师颇有同感地说:“是啊,如果家长都能按我们的要求去教育孩子,我们的工作就好做多了!”A老师接着说:“可这些家长不按我们的要求去做倒也罢了,还经常给我们提这样那样的意见,好像我们当老师的还不如他们懂得多,真拿这些家长没有办法……”

请你运用幼儿园与家庭相互配合的有关理论,分析和评论A、B老师的教育观点,并具体谈谈家园合作对幼儿发展的重要意义与目前存在的误区。

答案

参考答案:

家园合作是指幼儿园和家庭都把自己当做促进儿童发展的主体,双方积极主动地相互了解、相互配合、相互支持,通过幼儿园与家庭的双向互动,共同促进儿童的身心发展。《幼儿园教育指导纲要(试行)》总则里提出:幼儿园应与家庭、社区密切合作,与小学衔接,综合利用各种教育资源,共同为幼儿发展创造良好的条件。在组织与实施中,又指出:家庭是幼儿园重要的合作伙伴,应本着尊重平等合作的原则争取家长的理解、支持和主动参与,并积极支持、帮助家长提高教育能力。家园合作是幼教工作的重要组成部分,对于从家庭环境进入迥然不同的集体环境的新人园幼儿来说,家园合作的意义显得尤为重要。 

(1)家园合作有利于家长资源的充分利用。 

(2)家园配合一致,促进幼儿健康和谐发展。 

目前,家园合作还存在一些误区:一是认为教师是专业教育工作者,而家长大部分不懂教育;二是家长认为自己忙,没有时间参与幼儿园教育工作;三是教师只在知识上要求家长配合,家长也只愿意督促孩子写字、做算术题、背英语单词;四是认为家长与教师“各司其职”,在家归家长管,在幼儿园归老师管。这就造成了教师与家长的教育观念、方法的脱节,直接影响到幼儿园的正常教育工作。案例中的A、B两位教师的观点正是否认了幼儿园与家庭的紧密伙伴关系,否定了幼儿教师、家长均为幼儿的教育主体,其观点是片面的,错误的。

单项选择题
单项选择题

If there is one thing scientists have to hear, it is that the game is over. Raised on the belief of an endless voyage of discovery, they recoil from the suggestion that most of the best things have already been located. If they have, today’s scientists can hope to contribute no more than a few grace notes to the symphony of science.

A book to be published in Britain this week, The End of Science, argues persuasively that this is the case. Its author, John Horgan, is a senior writer for Scientific American magazine, who has interviewed many of today’s leading scientists and science philosophers. The shock of realizing that science might be over came to him, he says, when he was talking to Oxford mathematician and physicist Sir Roger Penrose.

The End of Science provoked a wave of denunciation in the United States last year. "The reaction has been one of complete shock and disbelief, "Mr. Horgan says.

The real question is whether any remaining unsolved problems, of which there are plenty, lend themselves to universal solutions. If they do not, then the focus of scientific discovery is already narrowing. Since the triumphs of the 1960s—the genetic code, plate tectonics, and the microwave background radiation that went a long way towards proving the Big Bang—genuine scientific revolutions have been scarce. More scientists are now alive, spending more money on research, that ever. Yet most of the great discoveries of the 19th and 20th centuries were made before the appearance of state sponsorship, when the scientific enterprise was a fraction of its present size.

Were the scientists who made these discoveries brighter than today’s That seems unlikely. A far more reasonable explanation is that fundamental science has already entered a period of diminished returns. "Look, don’t get me wrong," says Mr Horgan. "There are lots of important things still to study, and applied science and engineering can go on for ever. I hope we get a cure for cancer, and for mental disease, though there are few real signs of progress.

The term "the Big Bang" probably refers to()

A. the genetic code theory

B. a geological theory

C. a theory of the origin of the universe

D. the origin and the power of atomic energy