问题 阅读理解与欣赏

课内文言文阅读(9分,每小题3分)

武益愈,单于使使晓武,会论虞常,欲因此时降武。剑斩虞常已,律曰:“汉使张胜谋杀单于近臣,当死。单于募降者赦罪。”举剑欲击之,胜请降。律谓武曰:“副有罪,当相坐。”武曰:“本无谋,又非亲属,何谓相坐?”复举剑拟之,武不动。律曰:“苏君,律前负汉归匈奴,幸蒙大恩,赐号称王。拥众数万,马畜弥山,富贵如此!苏君今日降,明日复然。空以身膏草野,谁复知之?”武不应。律曰:“君因我降,与君为兄弟;今不听吾计,后虽复欲见我,尚可得乎?”武骂律曰:“汝为人臣子,不顾恩义,畔主背亲,为降虏于蛮夷,何以汝为见?且单于信汝,使决人死生,不平心持正,反欲斗两主,观祸败。若知我不降明,欲令两国相攻,匈奴之祸,从我始矣。”

律知武终不可胁,白单于。单于愈益欲降之。乃幽武置大窖中,绝不饮食。天雨雪,武卧啮雪,与旃毛并咽之,数日不死。匈奴以为神。乃徙武北海上无人处,使牧羝,羝乳乃得归。别其官属常惠等各置他所。

小题1:对下列句子中加点的词的解释,不正确的一项是

A.单于使使晓武,会虞常  论:讨论,评论

B.空以身草野    膏:使……肥沃

C.不顾恩义,主背亲  畔:同“叛”,背叛

D.羝乃得归乳:生子,生产小题2:下列各组句子中划线字的意义和用法完全相同的一项是

A.君我降,与君为兄弟宾客至蔺相如门谢罪

B.何以汝见吾羞,不忍之下

C.幽武置大窖中精思傅会,十年

D.举剑欲击二策,宁许以负秦曲小题3:下列各句对文段内容的解说,不正确的—项是

A.选文通过“天雨雪,武卧啮雪,与旃毛并咽之”的环境及细节描写,表现了苏武不屈的民族气节。

B.匈奴明白了威权富贵无法征服苏武,便想用摧毁肉体的方式来征服其意志,苏武的反抗也由以前的求死而变成以后的求生。

C.卫律使尽了威吓、利诱、逼迫等手段,但是始终未能动摇苏武对国家、对民族忠贞不贰的崇高气节。

D.为表现苏武的民族气节,选文中写了三个叛徒与苏武形成鲜明对比:一个是假吏常惠,一个是原汉将卫律,一个是副使张胜。

答案

小题1:A

小题1:A

小题1:D

小题1:论:判罪。

小题1:因:均作介词,表凭借,通过。B为:上句,语气助词;下句,动词,在、处于,位居。C乃:上句,连词,于是,就;下句,副词,才。D之:上句,代词,代“张胜”;下句,指示代词,这。

小题1:假吏常惠没有投降匈奴。

综合
单项选择题

In an age of perpetual digital connectedness, why do people seem so disconnected In a Duke University study, researchers found that from 1985 to 2004, the percentage of people who said there was no one with whom they discussed important matters tripled, to 25%; the same study found that overall, Americans had one-third fewer friends and confidants than they did two decades ago.

Another recent study, by researchers at the University of Michigan, found that college students today have significantly less empathy than students of generations past did. The reason, psychologists speculate, may have something to do with our increasing reliance on digital communication and other forms of new media.

It’s possible that instead of fostering real friendships off-line, e-mail and social networking may take the place of them—and the distance inherent in screen-only interactions may breed feelings of isolation or a tendency to care less about other people. After all, if you don’t feel like dealing with a friend’s problem online, all you have to do is log off.

The problem is, as empathy wanes, so does trust. And without trust, you can’t have a cohesive society. Consider the findings of a new study co-authored by Kevin Rockmann of George Mason University and Gregory Northcraft at the University of Illinois who specializes in workplace collaboration. Northcraft says high-tech communications like e-mail and (to a lesser extent) videoconferencing—which are sometimes known as "lean communication" because they have fewer cues like eye contact and posture for people to rely on—strip away the personal interaction needed to breed trust. In a business setting—as in all other social relationships outside the workplace—trust is a necessary condition for effective cooperation within a group. "Technology has made us much more efficient but much less effective," said Northcraft in a statement. "Something is being gained, but something is being lost. The something gained is time, and the something lost is the quality of relationships. And quality of relationships matters."

In Rockmann and Northcraft’s study, 200 students were divided into teams and asked to manage two complicated projects: one having to do with nuclear disarmament; the other, price fixing. Some groups communicated via e-mail, some via videoconference and others face to face. In the end, those who met in person showed the most trust and most effective cooperation; those using e-mail were the least able to work together and get the job done.

Northcraft thinks this is because real-life meetings, during which participants can see how engaged their colleagues are, breed more trust. Over e-mail, meanwhile, confirmation of hard work gets lost, which tends to encourage mutual slacking off.

Which of the following could best summarize the passage()

A. Digital communication is hurting personal relationship

B. Online networking may take the place of offline relationship

C. New media contribute less to fostering real friendship

D. Real-life meetings can breed trust among students