问题 阅读理解与欣赏

阅读下面文言文,完成小题。(每题3分,共12分)

观鸭说

(明)吴廷翰

家僮取鸭卵伏之,得雏鸭数十。始育,则饲之盆中,少与之水,其声呴呴然,其毛羽滈滈然,予甚爱,戏之。

不数日,僮以告曰:“雏鸭有毙者矣。”既而听其声,啾啾然哀鸣;视其毛羽,苏苏然以散落,予让僮不善畜也。僮曰:“是非不善畜也,畜不以水也。”

次日,予适憩亭中,时雨初歇,池水方强,顾而乐之,凭栏而语曰:“曷不以畜鸭雏?”僮趋而去,不移时筐而至,稍出之水涯,惶惶然惊愕不已,其目睢睢然睨,其足逡逡然前而却。竿之,则遂群奔水中,或扬足而驰,或拍翅而飞,不定者良久。既乃狎水,或仰而饮,或俯而啄,三五而阵,各适其所。则又或沉或浮,或没或出,盘旋戏跃于萍藻间。既休而理羽,交口扇翅,或曳而行,或拳而立,或屈而睡,容与如也。既晡,僮将筐而归,则相与复嬉于渚,或逐于堤,或蔽于丛,不可得,遂纵之。

明日至,亦如之。其声嗈嗈然以和,其毛羽濯濯然以光泽。其去畜池之前仅三日,充长已倍三之一矣。

余乃叹曰:大哉造物之育万物乎!龙蛇之于渊泽,虎豹之于山林,各遂其性而已。鸭之不育于陆而育于水,亦一理也。夫反其性,造化不能以育物,圣人岂能以育民乎?君子为政,当斯民沦丧之后,烦之以法令,胁之以刑罚,诱之以智巧,荡之以淫华,本性日耗,生理日促,相与骈死而不知。一旦欲其改途易辙,驱之以道德,荡之以礼义,纳之以忠信,囿之以淳朴,靡不相顾骇愕,不信不安。及其久也,教成而化行,行安而俗美,追视昔日之所为与今日之所趋,安危利害相去什佰而千万,则虽械之使为恶,日挞之而欲其蹈刑,亦不可得矣。

乃复叹曰:因育鸭得育民,然则兹观也,鸭与也乎哉!述观鸭。

【注释】①容与如:安逸自得的样子。

小题1:下列句中加线词语的解释不正确的一项是

A.予僮不善畜也让:指使

B.其足逡逡然前而却:后退

C.各其性而已遂:顺从

D.之以淳朴囿:约束小题2: 下列各组句子加线词语意义和用法相同的一项是

A.始育,则饲盆中大哉造物育万物乎

B.其毛羽滈滈则兹观也

C.畜不水也驱之道德

D.或拳立相与骈死不知小题3:下列对文中语句的解释,不符合文意的一项是

A.曷不以畜鸭雏?

为什么不用(这池水)来养小鸭子呢?

B.三五而阵,各适其所

(小鸭子们)三五成群,各自到自己喜欢的地方

C.僮将筐而归,则相与复嬉于渚

僮仆拿着筐子回家,于是我和小鸭子一起在水边嬉戏

D.靡不相顾骇愕没有人不互相看着既害怕又惊愕

小题4:下列的理解和分析,不符合文意的一项是

A.一开始小鸭子的声音和毛色都很可爱,作者很喜欢,但并不懂该如何养育。

B.小鸭子第一次到池水边,就马上成群结队地顺着竹竿跳进水里,尽情嬉戏。

C.作者借“养鸭”的小事说“育民”的大道理,强调当政者应顺应百姓本性。

D.文章由叙入议,描写细腻生动,议论充分深刻,形象性和思辨性兼而有之。

答案

小题1:A

小题2:C

小题3:C

小题4:B

题目分析:

小题1:让:责备。

小题2:两个“以’都是介词“用”。

小题3:僮仆想用箩筐把它们装好带回,小鸭子们却在水边嬸戏

小题4:“顺着竹竿”、马上“尽情嬉戏’错。

点评:一、文段难度适中,符合高考浅易的要求。二、文言实词题考得比较灵活,有课内知识迁移,也有语境分析,还可以通过常用语来推断,如“让”可根据语法推断,“却”可从常用词“退却”来推断。三、个人认为本题的不足之处在于没有设置翻译题,这不符合文言文的考查惯例。

判断题
阅读理解

阅读理解。

     Some students get so nervous before a test, they do poorly even if they know the material. Sian

Beilock has studied these highly anxious test-takers.

     Sian Beilock;"They start worrying about the consequences. They might even statrt worring about

whether this exam is going to prevent them from getting into the college they want. And when we worry ,

it actually uses up attention and memory resources. I talk about it as your cognitive horsepower that you

could otherwise be using to focus on the exam.

     Professor Beilock and another researcher, Gerardo Ramirez, have developed a possible solution.

Just before an exam, highly anxious test-takers spend ten minutes writing about their worries about the

test.

     Sian Beilock:" what we think happens is when students put it down on paper , they think about the

worst that could happen and they reappraise the situation. They might realize it's not as had as they

might think it was before and, in essence, it prevents these thoughts from popping up when they're

actually taking a test."

     The researchers tested the idea on a group of twenty anxious college students. They gave them two

short math tests. After the first one, they asked the students to either sit quietly or write about their feelings about the upcoming second test.

    The researchers added to the pressure. They told the students that those who did well on the second

test would get money. They also told them that their performance would affect other students as part

of a team effort.

    Professor Beilock says those who sat quietly scored an average of twelve percent worse on the

second test. But the students who had written about their fears improved their performance by an

average of five percent.

     Next, the researchers used younger students in a biology class. They told them before final exams

either to write about their feelings or to think about things unrelated to the test.

     Prefessor Beilock says highly anxious students who did the writing got an average grade of B+,

compared to a B- for those who did not.

     Sian Beilock :" What we showed is that for students who are highly test-anxious, who'd done our

writing intervention, all of a sudden there was no relationship between test anxiety and performance.

Those students most prone to worry were peroming just as well as their classmates who don't normally

get nervous in these testing situations."

     But what if students do not have a chance to write about their fears immediately before and exam

or presentation ?Professor Beilock says students can try it themselves at home or in the library and

still improve their performance.

1. What may happen if students have the problem of test anxiety?

A. Test anxiety can improve students' performance to some degree.

B. Students' attention and memory resources run out when worred.

C. Students may not be admitted into their favorite college if worried

D. Test anxiety is sure to cause students to fail the test.

2. Which of the following if TRUE?

A. In the first math test, students who sat quietly performed better.

B. In the second math test, students who wrote about their feelings did worse.

C. Some college students are highly anxious test-takers while others are not in the tests.

D. The result in the math test agrees with that in the biology test.

3. What does the underlined phrase "popping up" mean?

A. Appearing suddenly

B. Fading away

C. Becoming clearly

D. Giving out

4. what is most probably sian Beilocj ?

A. A psychology professor.

B. A philosophy researcher.

C. A politics professor

D. A tutor

5. What is the main idea of the passage?

A . It is a common practice for students being worried before a test.

B. Being worried before tests does harm to students' performance.

C. Anxious students overcome test anxiety by writing down fears.

D. It is important for students to overcome test anxiety.