被告人江某与被害人郑某是同一家电脑公司的工作人员，二人同住一_爱下问搜题

搜题请搜索小程序“爱下问搜题”

问题单项选择题

被告人江某与被害人郑某是同一家电脑公司的工作人员，二人同住一间集体宿舍。某日，郑某将自己的信用卡交江某保管，3天之后索回。一周后，郑某发现自己的信用卡丢失，到银行挂失时，得知卡上1.5万元已被人取走。郑某报案后，司法机关找到了江某。江承认是其所为，但对作案事实前后供述不一。第一次供述称，在郑某将信用卡交其保管时，利用以前与郑某一起取款时偷记下的郑某信用卡上的密码，私下在取款机上取款；第二次供述称，是仿制了一张信用卡后，用所获取的郑某信用卡上的有关信息取款；第三次供述却称，是拾得郑某的信用卡后，用该卡取款。但被害人郑某怀疑是江某盗窃其信用卡后取走卡上所存的钱款。如果郑某将信用卡交江某保管时，江某私下用来取走了现金，下列说法正确的是：( )

A．江某构成侵占罪

B．江某构成信用卡诈骗罪

C．江某构成盗窃罪

D．江某不构成犯罪

答案

参考答案：B

解析：[考点] 信用卡诈骗罪的客观要件
[详解] 根据《刑法》第196条的规定，冒用他人信用卡的诈骗行为，表现为非持卡人以持卡人的名义使用持卡人的信用卡骗取财物的行为。郑某将信用卡交江某保管，江某私下用信用卡取走现金，这是一种冒用他人信用卡的诈骗行为，构成信用卡诈骗罪。而侵占罪是以非法占有为目的，将代为保管的他人财物或者他人的遗忘物、埋藏物非法占为己有，数额较大，拒不退还的行为。江某的行为属于牵连犯，应择一重罪即信用卡诈骗罪处理。

阅读理解

Richard’s father died when he was five. Later on he   36  his mother. The poor boy had to   37  on his own, so he went to work for a rich farmer, who paid him nothing except food and clothes. An old woman felt   38  for him and often helped him. The boy wanted to go to (the) 39  very much, but he had no money. But he   40  lost heart and found some old books near the school and   41  himself to read and write.
There was a narrow   42  between two mountains which connected the village and the town. One morning people   43  there was a big stone on the path. It brought them   44 : they had to move it away, or they had to cross the mountains to the town.   45  the stone weighed thirty tons at least and even the strongest young man couldn’t move it. They   46  for a long time, but nobody knew what to do.
Richard looked at it carefully for a while and said, “I have a   47  to move it away.” But   48  men believed him. Some villagers even   49  him. The night   50  and people went back. Only the boy stayed there. To their surprise, the villagers found the stone was   51  the next morning. They didn’t   52  who had moved it away. The old woman said Richard had done it all by himself.
“How could he?” the rich farmer called out, “He’s   53  fifteen! He couldn’t move it at all!”
“He   54  a big hole beside the stone.” said the old woman, “and then he could   55  push it into the hole!”
Looking at each other, the villagers couldn’t say a word.

A．cared about

C．looked after

问答题

68岁的周老太太自老伴去世后，独自住在北京市朝阳区祖传的老屋中。1993年4月，周老太太分别给3个子女写信，要求他们每人每月给自己100元赡养费。其中甲、乙分别是周的继子和继女，甲住在北京市海淀区，乙住在北京市丰台区。丙是周的亲生子，8个月前由河南省信阳县某部队复员，现在北京市昌平县一家制鞋厂工作，其户籍已由河南信阳县迁出，但尚未落户。甲、乙对周老太太的去信置之不理。周老太太的信到达丙的工作单位时，丙已被派往天津出差1个半月，也没有答复周老太大的信。1993年6月，周老太太决定向法院起诉，向3个子女追索赡养费。请问：

1993年10月，法院判决甲、乙、丙每人每月向周老太太支付100元赡养费。到1994年 1月，甲、乙、丙均未给付周老太太任何赡养费。周老太太向人民法院申请强制执行。请问该案应如何执行