问题 单项选择题

Passage Three

Immigrants are consumers as well as producers, so they create jobs as well as taking them. And the work they do need not be at the expense of native workers. Immigrants often hold jobs that natives are unwilling to accept at any feasible wage.
Also, immigrants sometimes help to keep industries viable (能存活的) that would otherwise disappear altogether, causing employment to fall. This was the conclusion of a study of the Los Angeles garment industry in the 1970s and 1980s. And when immigrants working for low wages do put downward pressure on natives’ wages, they may raise the (real) wages of natives in general by keeping prices lower than they otherwise would be.
In theory, then, the net effect of immigration on native wages is uncertain. Unfortunately, most of the empirical (经验主义的) research on whether immigrants make natives worse off in practice is also inconclusive except the effect, one way or the other, seems small. Most of this research has been done in America: if there were any marked influence on wages, that is where you would expect to find it, given the scale of immigration and the tendency of the newcomers to concentrate in certain areas. But most studies have compared wages and employment in areas with many immigrants to wages and employment in areas with few. For instance, one examined the impact of sudden and notorious inflow of refugees to Miami from the Cuban port of Mariel in 1980. Within the space of a few months, 125 000 people had arrived, increasing Miami’s labor force by 7%. Yet the study concluded that wages and employment among the city’s natives, including the unskilled, were virtually unaffected. Another study examined the effect of immigration on wages and employment of those at the bottom of the jobs ladder—unskilled blacks and Hispanics. It found that a doubling of the rate of immigration had no detectable effect on natives.
The most recent work, admittedly, has tended to question these findings. Using more detailed statistics and more sophisticated methods than the earlier studies, this work has tended to find that immigrants’ wages take longer to rise to the level of the natives’ wages than has been supposed. This implies a more persistent downward pressure on the host economy’s labor market.
Typically these studies find that immigration does depress unskilled natives’ wages to a small extent. But nearly all economists would agree that the effects of immigration are insignificant in relation to other influences.

The passage is intended to convey that the effect of immigration on natives’ wages is ______.

A.uncertain

B.persistent

C.inconclusive

D.insignificant

答案

参考答案:D

解析:综合理解题。文章主要探讨移民是否会影响本国工人的工资,作者引用调查研究的结果、举例等,目的就是在于说明移民对本国工人的工资的影响相对于其他因素的影响是很小的。所以D是正确答案。

问答题 简答题

甲公司2013年初将一幢自有二层楼房租赁给乙公司作为经营用房,双方签订租赁合同,合同约定:租赁期限为25年,租金为每月5000元,在每月初的前3天支付上月的租金。合同未约定房屋维修责任的承担以及是否可以转租等问题。

2014年8月,乙公司为改善条件,未经甲公司同意,在该房屋内改建一间休息室,并安装了整体橱柜等设施。甲公司得知后要求乙公司拆除该休息室及设施,乙公司拒绝。

2015年3月,甲公司有意出售该租赁楼房,因乙公司无意购买,甲公司遂将租赁楼房转让给丙企业,丙企业取得租赁楼房所有权后,以自己不是租赁合同当事人为由向乙公司表示要解除租赁合同,乙公司不同意解除合同,但愿意每月增加租金1000元,丙企业表示同意。

2015年8月,租赁楼房的部分门窗自然损坏,乙公司要求丙企业修理,丙企业一直未予理睬,乙公司自行找某装修企业维修,为此支付维修费用4000元。

2015年10月,乙公司另购买了一办公大楼。遂将其所租赁楼房转租给丁企业。丙企业于2016年1月3日得知转租事实后,以不得转租为由向乙公司主张解除租赁合同并要求乙公司支付上月未交付租金6000元,乙公司表示,维修费用可以抵销4000元租金,只愿意再支付2000元,但不同意解除租赁合同。

要求:根据《合同法》的有关规定,回答下列问题。

甲公司是否有权要求乙公司拆除休息室及设施?并说明理由。

判断题