问题 阅读理解

Some people believe that international sport creates goodwill between the nations and that if countries play games together they will learn to live together. Others say that the opposite is true: international contests encourage false national pride and lead to misunderstanding and hatred. There is probably some truth in both arguments, but in recent years the Olympic Games have done little to support the view that sports encourage international brotherhood. Not only was there the incident of tragedy involving murders of athletes, but the Games were also ruined by lesser incidents caused principally by minor national contests.

One country received its second-place medals with visible anger after the hockey final. There had been noisy scenes at the end of the hockey match, as the losers disagreed with the final decisions. They believed that one of their goals should have been allowed and that their opponents’ victory was unfair. Their manager was in great anger when he said: “This isn’t hockey. Hockey and the International Hockey Federation are finished.” The president of the Federation said later that such behavior could result in the suspension(停赛) of the team for at least three years.

The American basketball team announced that they would not yield first place to Russia, after a disputable(有争议的) end to their contest. The game had ended in disorder. It was thought at first that the United States had won by a single point, but it was announced that there were three seconds still to play. A Russian player then threw the ball from one end of the court to the other, and another player popped it into the basket. It was the first time the US had ever lost an Olympic basketball match. An appeal jury (评审委员会) debated the matter for four and a half hours before announcing that the result would stand. The American players then voted not to receive the silver medals.

Incidents of this kind will continue as long as sport is played competitively rather than for the love of the game. The suggestion that athletes should compete as individuals or in non-national teams, might be too much to hope for. But in the present organization of the Olympics there is far too much that encourages aggressive patriotism (爱国主义).

小题1:According to the author, recent Olympic Games have ____.

A.created goodwill between the nations

B.hardly showed any international friendship

C.caused only false national pride

D.led to more and more misunderstanding and hatred小题2:What did the manager mean by saying, “...Hockey and the International Hockey Federation are finished”?

A.There should be no more hockey matches organized by the Federation.

B.His team would no longer take part in international games.

C.Hockey and the Federation are ruined by the unfair decisions.

D.The Federation should be ended.小题3: The basketball example implied that        .

A.too much patriotism was displayed in the incident

B.the announcement to make the match last longer was wrong

C.the appeal jury was too hesitant in making the decision

D.The American team was right in receiving the silver medals小题4:Which statement best summarizes this passage?

A.The organization of the Olympic Games must be improved.

B.Different teams often have disputes when fighting for the first place.

C.Any team that has disrespectful behavior should be suspended.

D.Athletes should compete as individuals.

答案

小题1:B

小题2:C

小题3:A

小题4:A

题目分析:本文通过举例说明奥运会上的竞赛阻碍了国际间的友谊,所以提出奥运会机构必须要改革。

小题1:细节题:根据第一段的句子:" but in recent years the Olympic Games have done little to support the view that sport encourages international brotherhood.可知在最近几年的奥运会上,没有体现出体育鼓励国际间的手足情谊,故选B。

小题2:推理题:根据第二段的句子:They believed that one of their goals should have been allowed and that their opponents’ victory was unfair.这段描述可知他们认为比赛结果不公平,故选C。

小题3:推理题:根据第三段的句子:There is probably some truth in both arguments, but in recent years the Olympic Games have done little to support the view that sport encourages international brotherhood.这句可以看出,举这个例子主要是说明运动会上的竞赛阻碍了国际间的友谊,故选A。

小题4:主旨题:根据Incidents of this kind will continue as long as sport is played competitively rather than for the love of the game这句可推断出奥运会机构必须要改进,故选A

材料题

阅读下列材料,回答问题。

材料一 中国古代的“选举”与源自西方、现在流行的“选举”虽然中文字面相同,但在实质内容方面无疑是有着根本性的差别的。——[英]戴维·米勒、韦农·波格丹诺《布莱克维尔政治学百科全书》

材料二 中国进入近代以前,人们心目中所指的“选举”又与现在人们心目中所指的“选举”不同,它不是指人们投票选举代表、议员或者自基层到最高层的各级领袖,而完全是指另外的、令人已经相当陌生却正是我们现在所要叙述的东西。而由此一个古代概念的完全更新,也正好可以从一个侧面见出天翻地覆的百年世变。——何怀宏《选举社会及其终结——秦汉至晚清历史的一种社会学阐释》

材料三 人道进化,皆有定位。……由君主而渐为立宪,由立宪而渐为共和。……进化有渐,因革有由,验之万国,莫不同风。——康有为《论语注》

孙中山提出革命进化的观点。他说,欲救亡图存……共和制度是当今世界上最好的制度,中国应当取法乎上,直接建立共和制度,“方才是人力的进步”。——汤奇学《孙中山的社会进化思想述评》

材料四 美国1787年建立宪政民主制度,经历了……共180多年,才真正实现公民普选权不受种族、性别、财产、年龄限制。英国经历的时间更长一些,从1688年建立君主立宪政体到1928年取消选举权的男女不平等经历了240年。……中国从第一部宪法颁布就规定,除依照法律被剥夺政治权利的人之外,我国“年满18岁的公民,不分民族、种族、性别、职业、家庭出身、宗教信仰、教育程度、财产状况、居住期限,都有选举权和被选举权”。——陈红太《中国民主政治建设的基本共识和民主现代化的实现》

(1)简要说明材料一中“源自西方”的“选举”制度主要指什么。根据所学知识,指出它与中国古代的“选举”制度的根本区别。

___________________________________________________________________________________________

(2)依据材料二,指出现在“人们心目中所指的‘选举’”是什么选举制度。这一制度与处于起源阶段的西方“选举”有什么不同?

___________________________________________________________________________________________

(3)依据材料三,概括康有为、孙中山的思想主张,并结合所学知识分析他们宣传进化论的主要原因。

___________________________________________________________________________________________

(4)依据材料四,比较美英两国宪政民主制度下的选举制度与中国第一部宪法规定的选举制度有何不同。

___________________________________________________________________________________________

选择题