问题 选择题

With the electricity __________, people use candles instead.[ ]

A. cut off      

B. cut in      

C. cut away      

D. cut down

答案

答案:A

单项选择题

阅读下面短文,回答下面问题。
动身访美之前,一位旧时同窗写来封航空信,再三托付我为他带几颗生枣核。东西倒不占分量,可是用途却很蹊跷。
从费城出发前,我们就通了电话。一下车,他已经在站上等了。掐指一算,分手快有半个世纪了,现在都已是风烛残年。
拥抱之后,他就殷切地问我:“带来了吗”我赶快从手提包里掏出那几颗枣核。他托在掌心,像比珍珠玛瑙还贵重。
他当年那股调皮劲显然还没改。我问起枣核的用途,他一面往衣兜里揣,一面故弄玄虚地说:“等会儿你就明白啦。”
那真是座美丽的山城,汽车开去,一路坡上坡下满是一片嫣红。倘若在中国,这里一定会有枫城之称。过了几个坳,他朝枫树丛中一座三层小楼指了指说:“喏,到了。”汽车拐进草坪,离车库还有三四米,车库门就像认识主人似的自动掀启。
朋友有点不好意思地解释说,买这座大房子时,孩子们还上着学,如今都成家立业了。学生物化学的老伴儿在一家研究所里做营养试验。
他把我安顿在二楼临湖的一个房间后,就领我去踏访他的后花园。地方不大,布置得却精致匀称。我们在靠篱笆的一张白色长凳上坐下,他劈头就问我:“觉不觉得这花园有点家乡味道”经他指点,我留意到台阶两旁是他手栽的两株垂杨柳,草坪中央有个睡莲池。他感慨良深地对我说:“栽垂柳的时候,我那个小子才五岁。如今在一条核潜艇上当总机械长了。姑娘在哈佛教书。家庭和事业都如意,各种新式设备也都有了。可是我心上总像是缺点什么。也许是没出息,怎么年纪越大,思乡越切。我现在可充分体会出游子的心境了。我想厂甸,想隆福寺。这里一过圣诞,我就想旧历年。近来,我老是想总布胡同院里那棵枣树。所以才托你带几颗种籽,试种一下。”
接着,他又指着花园一角堆起的一座假山石说:“你相信吗那是我开车到几十里以外,一块块亲手挑选,论公斤买下,然后用汽车拉回来的。那是我们家的‘北海’。”
说到这里,我们两人都不约而同地站了起来。穿过草坪旁用卵石铺成的小径,走到“北海”跟前。真是个细心人呢,他在上面还嵌了一所泥制的小凉亭,一座红庙,顶上还有尊白塔。朋友解释说,都是从旧金山唐人街买来的。
他告诉我,时常在月夜,他同老伴儿并肩坐在这长凳上,追忆起当年在北海泛舟的日子。睡莲的清香迎风扑来,眼前仿佛就闪出一片荷塘佳色。
改了国籍,不等于就改了民族感情,而且没有一个民族像我们这么依恋故土的。
(萧乾《枣核》)

对枣核在文中作用的解释,不恰当的一项是:

A.枣核被用来设置悬念。

B.枣核是作者带给同窗的礼物。

C.枣核被作为贯穿全文的线索。

D.枣核起到以小见大的作用。

单项选择题

Passage Three


Opinion polls are now beginning to show that, whoever is to blame and whatever happens from now on, high unemployment is probably here to stay. This means we shall have to find ways of sharing the available employment more widely.
But we need to go further. We must ask some fundamental questions about the future work. Should we continue to treat employment as the norm Should we not rather encourage many ways for self-respecting people to work Should we not create conditions in which many of us can work for ourselves, rather than for an employer Should we not aim to revive the household and the neighborhood, as well as the factory and the office, as centers of production and work
The industrial age has been the only period of human history in which most people’s work has taken the form of jobs. The industrial age may now be coming to an end, and some of the changes in work patterns which it brought may have to be reversed. This seems a daunting thought. But, in fact, it could offer the prospect of a better future for work. Universal employment, as its history shows, has not meant economic freedom.
Employment became widespread when the enclosures of the 17th and 18th centuries made many people dependent on paid work by depriving them of the use of the land, and thus of the means to provide a living for themselves. Then the factory system destroyed the cottage industries and removed work from people’s homes. Later, as transport improved first by rail and then by road, people commuted longer distances to their places of employment until, eventually, many people’s work lost all connection with their home lives and the places in which they live.
Meanwhile, employment put women at a disadvantage. In preindustrial times, men and women had shared the productive work of the household and village community. Now it became customary for the husband to go out to paid employment, leaving the unpaid work of the home and families to his wife. Tax and benefit regulations still assume this norm today, and restrict more flexible sharing of work roles between the sexes.
It was not only women whose work status suffered. As employment became the dominant form of work,young people and old people were excluded—a problem now,as more teenagers become frustrated at school and more retired people want to live active lives.
All this may now have to change.
The time has certainly come to switch some effort and resources away from the idealist goal crea- ting jobs for all, to the urgent practical task of helping many people to manage without full-time jobs.

What does the word“daunting”in the third paragraph mean

A.shocking

B.interesting

C.confusing

D.stimulating