问题 问答题

作为领导的你被 * * 群众拦车,你怎么处理

答案

参考答案:

解析:(1) 这次群众来 * * ,一定有原因,涉及群众的事情,都是大事,都是非常重要的事情,我会虚心听他们讲述,并且尽力为之解决好。 (2) 我要控制好自己的情绪,绝对不能因为有群众拦车就失去耐心,就变得态度恶劣,我要用一颗热情的心去倾听他们的问题和困难。 (3) 我会采取以下措施:首先,对群众的不满情绪进行安抚,请他们先保持冷静和理性,然后请出一两个群众代表,来了解他们 * * 的原因。在对原因做出分析后,给出相应的解决办法,如果是由于一些相关政策没有给群众解释清楚,那么我会就相关政策的要点耐心细致地向群众解释,直到群众明白满意为止;如果是工作态度、方式方法上的问题,我会调整工作态度,改善方法方式,用更通俗易懂的语言给群众解释,确保沟通交流的顺畅,从而取得群众的理解和支持。 (4) 通过这次事件,我会认真总结工作中的经验教训,及时向上级汇报并做相应的检讨。在以后的工作中,切实为老百姓做好服务工作。[题目分析] 这是一道考查考生应急应变能力的题目,群众 * * 拦车,肯定是有群众的原因,说明我们的工作做得还不到位。 [思路拓展] 此题先表态表示自己对于群众 * * 的重视。然后,安抚群众的情绪,请出代表了解情况,分析原因并加以解决。最后,总结自己工作的不足之处,并且向上级汇报,做出检讨。

填空题
单项选择题

阅读判断:下面的短文后列出了7个句子,请根据短文的内容对每个句子作出判断:如果该句提供的是正确信息,请选择A;如果该句提供的是错误信息,请选择B;如果该句的信息文中没有提及,请选择C。

When Our Words Collide

“Wanna buy a body?” That was the opening line of more than a few phone calls I got from freelance(自由职业 ) photographers when I was a photo editor at U.S. News. Like many in the mainstream press, I wanted to separate the world of photographers into “them”, who trade in picture of bodies or chase celebrities, and “us”, the serious news people. But after 16 years in that role. I came to wonder whether the two worlds were easily distinguishable.

Working in the reputable world of journalism, I assigned photographers to cover other people’s nightmares. I justified invading moments of grief, under the guise(借口) of the reader's right to know. I didn’t ask photographers to trespass(冒犯) or to stalk(跟踪),but I didn’t have to: I worked with pros(同行) who did what others did: talking their way into situations or shooting from behind police lines to get pictures I was after. And I wasn’t alone.

In the aftermath of a car crash or some other hideous incident when ordinary people are hurt or killed, you rarely see photographers pushing past rescue workers to capture the blood and gore(血雨腥风). But you are likely to see the local newspaper and television photographers on the scene - and fast.

How can we justify our behavior? Journalists are taught to separate doing the job from worrying about the consequence of publishing what they record. Repeatedly, they are reminded of a news-business dictum(格言): leave your conscience in the office. You get the picture of the footage: the decision whether to print or air it comes later. A victim may lie bleeding, unconscious, or dead: your job is to record the image. You put away your emotions and document the scene.

We act this way partly because we know that the pictures can have important meaning. Photographs can change deplorable(凄惨的) situations by mobilizing public outrage or increase public understanding.

However, disastrous events often bring out the worst in photographers and photo editors. In the first minutes and hours after a disaster occurs, photo agencies buy pictures. Often an agency buys a picture from a local newspaper or an amateur photographer and put it up for bid by major magazines. The most keenly sought “exclusives” command tens of thousands of dollars through bidding contests.

Many people believe that journalists need to change the way they do things, and it’s our pictures that annoy people the most. Readers may not believe, as we do, that there is a distinction between sober-minded “us” and sleazy(低级庸俗的) “them”. In too many cases, by our choices of images as well as how we get them, we prove our readers right.

Many people say that they are annoyed by the U.S. News pictures.

A.Right

B.Wrong

C.Not mentioned