问题 阅读理解

From the health point of view we are living in a marvelous age. We are immunized from birth against many of the most dangerous diseases. A large number of once fatal illnesses can now be cured by modern drugs and surgery. It is almost certain that one day remedies will be found for the most stubborn remaining diseases. The expectation of life has increased enormously. But though the possibility of living a long and happy life is greater than ever before, every day we witness the incredible slaughter of men, women and children on the roads. Man versus the motor-car ! It is a never-ending battle which man is losing. Thousands of people the world over are killed or horribly killed each year and we are quietly sitting back and letting it happen.

It has been rightly said that when a man is sitting behind a steering wheel, his car becomes the extension of his personality. There is no doubt that the motor-car often brings out a man’s very worst qualities. People who are normally quiet and pleasant may become unrecognizable when they are behind a steering-wheel. They swear, they are ill-mannered and aggressive, willful as two-years-olds and utterly selfish. All their hidden frustrations, disappointments and jealousies seem to be brought to the surface by the act of driving.

The surprising thing is that society smiles so benignly on the motorist and seems to condone his behaviour. Everything is done for his convenience. Cities are allowed to become almost uninhabitable because of heavy tragic; towns are made ugly by huge car parks; the countryside is desecrated by road networks; and the mass annual slaughter becomes nothing more than a statistic, to be conveniently forgotten.

It is high time a world code were created to reduce this senseless waste of human life. With regard to driving, the laws of some countries are notoriously lax and even the strictest are not strict enough. A code which was universally accepted could only have a dramatically beneficial effect on the accident rate. Here are a few examples of some the things that might be done. The driving test should be standardized and made far more difficult than it is; all the drivers should be made to take a test every three years or so; the age at which young people are allowed to drive any vehicle should be raised to at least 21; all vehicles should be put through stringent annual tests for safety. Even the smallest amount of alcohol in the blood can impair a person’s driving ability. Present drinking and driving laws (where they exist) should be mad much stricter. Maximum and minimum speed limits should be imposed on all roads. Governments should lay down safety specifications for manufacturers, as has been done in the USA. All advertising stressing power and performance should be banned. These measures may sound inordinately harsh. But surely nothing should be considered as to severe if tit results in reducing the annual toll of human life. After all, the world is for human beings, not motor-cars.

小题1:The main idea of this passage is

[A] Traffic accidents are mainly caused by motorists.

Thousands of people the world over are killed each year.

[C] The laws of some countries about driving are too lax.

[D] Only stricter traffic laws can prevent accidents.

小题2:What does the author think of society toward motorists?

[A] Society smiles on the motorists.

Huge car parks are built in the cities and towns.

[C] Victims of accidents are nothing.

[D] Society condones their rude driving.

小题3:Why does the author say:’ his car becomes the extension of his personality?’

[A] Driving can show his real self.

Driving can show the other part of his personality.

[C] Driving can bring out his character.

[D] His car embodies his temper.

小题4:.Which of the followings is NOT mentioned as a way against traffic accidents?

[A] Build more highways.

Stricter driving tests.

[C] Test drivers every three years.

[D] raise age limit and lay down safety specifications.

小题5:.The attitude of the author is

[A] ironical

critical

[C] appealing

[D] militant

Vocabulary

1.immunise             使免疫,使免除

2.expectation of life =" life" expectancy    平均寿命

3.versus =" against"             对顶,反对

4.mutilate             伤害

5.wilful             任性的,固执的

6.benign             宽厚的,仁慈的

7.condone             宽容

8.desecrate          亵渎,玷污

9.code             法规,规定,惯例

10.stringent          严格的,紧急的,迫切的

11.performance                   演出,成品,这里是指

car’ s behavior such as speed,

function etc.可译成行为,

汽车行为、功能等。

难句译注

1.Man versus the motor-car ! It is a never-ending battle which man is losing.

【参考译文】人和汽车对抗!这是一场人类永远是输家的无休止的战斗。

2.All advertising stressing power and performance should be banned.

【参考译文】应当禁止所有强调力量和表现行为的广告。

写作方法与文章大意

文章论述“交通事故”,采用因果、对比手法。从人的平均寿命增加和交通事故率成正比谈起,触及事故率上升的原因,要求制定更严格的法规予以制止种种造成事故的不良行为。

答案

小题1:D

小题2:D

小题3:A

小题4:A

小题5:B

小题1:D 只有更严格的交通法规才能制止交通事故。这在最后一段的结论中体现的最清楚。前面几段只是讲造成事故的种种原因。其目的就是:“是制定世界交通法规以减少无谓的生命浪费的时候了。对于开车,有些国家的法规太松弛,甚至最严格的国家也不够严格。世界公认之法律只可能对交通事故率起大大降低的作用(有非常好的效果。)”这里列出几件要干的事:“驾驶测试应当标准化,比现在的要严格;所有死机每三年考核一次;年轻人驾车的允许年龄应提高到21岁;全部机动车每年都应经过严格的安全测试(测定其安全性)……这些步骤可能听起来异常严厉,可是,如果其结果事减少每年死伤人数的话,就不存在什么太严格的事了。”

A. 主要是机动车死机造成的交通事故。 B. 全世界每年有几千人丧生。 C. 有些国家的交通法规太松弛。这三道答案都是文中谈到某一点,不能作为中心目的。

小题2:D 社会宽容这种野蛮开车行径。答案就在第三段:“令人惊讶的是社会对司机宽厚地笑笑,似乎宽容他们的行为。一切都为他们的方便而干。人们允许城市由于交通拥挤而几乎不能居住了,大型停车场把城镇“弄得”丑陋不堪,公路网玷污了乡村,每年大量的杀伤仅仅成为统计数字,被很容易地忘记。”

A. 社会对司机笑容可掬。B. 大型停车场建在市和镇上。C. 交通死难者等于零。这三项都只是第三段的一个个具体事实。社会正是通过这一件件事来宽容司机野蛮开车,而造成事故。

小题3:A “他的车就是他个性的外延”这句话就体现了“开车表现他真正的自我,真实的个性”。第二段讲的很清楚:“这么说完全正确:当一个人坐在方向盘后,他的车就成为他个性的外延。毫无疑问,汽车常常表现了人之最坏的品质。平常很安详愉快的人一坐在方向盘后可能就变得难以认识。他们咒骂、行为差劲、好斗、固执、任性得就像两岁的孩子。他们所有隐藏的失落、失望和忌妒感,似乎都在开车中暴露出来”。

B. 表现他个性的另一面。 C. 表现了他的性格。 D. 他的车体现了他的脾气秉性。只是表现自我中的某个事实。

小题4:A 只有建更多高速公路。没有提。

B. 更难的测试。C. 每三年对司机进行一次考察。 D. 提高年龄段和制定安全条例。都提到。见第一题译注。

小题5:B 批评的态度。文章第一、二、三段指出了造成交通事故的原因,呼吁各国制定严格的交通法规,批评现有的交通法规松弛不严格,最后指出世界是人类的,不是摩托车的等等,都说明作者对上述种种都具批评的态度。

A. 讽刺的。 C. 哀求的、呼吁的。 D. 富有战斗性的。

阅读理解与欣赏

阅读下面的文字,完成后面题目。(9分)

今天我们该如何学雷锋

郑连根

自1963年3月5日毛 * * 为雷锋题词以来,雷锋的形象从最初的十全十美,逐渐还原为有血有肉、可信可爱,可谓走下了“神坛”。相应的,我觉得学雷锋的方式方法也应该与时俱进,力避过去学雷锋活动中所出现的种种弊端。

雷锋精神的实质是“全心全意为人民服务”。这种精神是好的,在任何时代都不会过时。可是,毋庸讳言,我们过去学雷锋也一度出现过这样或那样的问题,甚至造成了“雷锋三月来四月走”的尴尬现实。之所以出现这样的情况,我觉得很重要的一点就是:过去那种“运动式”的学雷锋方式值得商榷,而学雷锋过程中出现的形式主义的问题也让不少人“很受伤”。

学雷锋是提倡奉献精神和服务意识,这说到底是道德领域的事,属于“道统”的范畴。道德是一种诉诸人们心灵的软约束,这种特点决定了它天然地不适合用强硬乃至强悍的方式去推行。若以强制的手段对人们推行道德教化,势必会催生形式主义,同时还会让人走向道德的反面:伪善。在还没有真正升起善心但又不得不做出种种善行之时,人们最本能的选择就是以伪善之举应付了事。

学雷锋活动是在特定的历史时期发起的,免不了会有当时的历史烙印和时代局限,我们不能苛求前人。但是,我们今天再提倡学雷锋,理应有更好的方式方法。学雷锋是一件好事,但做好事也要有好的思路,好的方式和方法。

就现实情况而论,我认为学雷锋活动宜从两个方向用力。其一,中国人惯于“以吏为师”,只有领导干部带头学雷锋,雷锋精神才能落到实处。从2012年2月6日到2月17日,《人民日报》以“本报评论员”的名义陆续发表了六篇“换届之际话官德”的文章,这组文章从不同的视角讨论了官德的重要性,提醒各级官员要“不为名所累、不为利所缚、不为权所动、不为欲所惑”,“在是非抉择中筑牢政德的基石”。我觉得各级领导干部若能做到以上几点,那便是把学雷锋落到了实处。

另外,提倡领导带头学雷锋还不要放松了监督机制的建设。道德软约束和制度硬约束之间并不是矛盾的,而且二者常常是相得益彰的。古今中外的诸多事实都证明,只有权力作恶的空间被硬约束极大压缩之后,官员的道德操守才会有基本保障,而普通民众的道德水平也会水涨船高。

其二,改变过去那种生硬的“运动式”学雷锋的模式,代之以民间广泛参与的志愿者模式。在2008年汶川大地震之后,中国的民间慈善力量和志愿者组织已成为一股健康清新的社会力量,他们不计名利,无私奉献,在许多领域都赢得了人们的尊重和喝彩。可以说,他们是新时代雷锋精神的继承者和发扬者,他们也一定会为学雷锋活动注入新的生机和活力。

(摘编自《济南日报》2012年3月5日)

小题1:下列对文章“学雷锋”的理解,不正确的一项是(3分)

A.学雷锋五十年,雷锋的形象越来越模糊了,从最初的十全十美,逐渐还原为有血有肉,可谓走下了“神坛”。

B.学雷锋过程中出现了“雷锋三月来四月走”,有人为名所累、为利所缚、为欲所惑等方面的问题,让不少人“很受伤”。

C.学雷锋要联系实际,关注中国人惯于“以吏为师”的现实情况,只有领导干部带头学雷锋,雷锋精神才能落到实处。

D.学雷锋要改变过去那种生硬的“运动式”,代之以民间广泛参与的志愿者模式,他们是雷锋精神的继承者和发扬者。小题2:结合文本,就“雷锋三月来四月走”的现象,谈谈你的看法。(3分)

小题3:请简要概括文章的观点。(3分)

单项选择题