问题 不定项选择

(一)2005年6月27日,甲房地产开发公司(以下简称甲公司)通过拍卖取得了A市(非经济特区)城市规划区内一地块,并与国土管理部门签订了土地使用权出让合同。该地块为商品住宅开发用地,合同规定的该住宅用地出让年限为出让最高年限,从土地交付使用之日开始计算。2005年7月27日,在缴纳了出让金和相关费用后,该土地被交付给甲公司使用。 2005年8月30日,甲公司根据市场情况申请改变土地利用条件,获得相关部门批准并变更了出让合同。甲公司通过邀请招标确定了施工单位。经过一段时间的建设后,甲公司将该项目的销售权独家委托给乙房地产经纪公司(以下简称乙公司)。2006年2月15日,李某以 5600元/m2的价格预购了该项目中的一套98m2房屋。甲公司于2007年5月30日将房屋交付给李某。李某办理了房屋所有权证和国有土地使用证。

按相关规定,乙公司因销售给李某房屋所收取的代理费用不得超过(    )元。

A.2744

B.13720

C.16464

D.16500

答案

参考答案:C

多项选择题
问答题

The first mention of slavery in the statutes of the English colonies of North America does not occur until after 1660--some forty years after the importation of the first Black people. Lest we think that slavery existed in fact before it did in law, Oscar and Mary Simon assure us that the status of Black people down to the 1660’s was that of servants. (46) A critique of the Simons’ interpretation of why legal slavery did not appear until the 1660’s suggests that assumptions about the relation between slavery and racial prejudice should be reexamined, and that explanations for the different treatment of Black slaves in North and South America should be expanded.
(47) The Simons explain the appearance of legal slavery by contending that, during the 1660’s, the position of White servants was improving relative to that of Black servants. Thus, the Simons argue, Black and White servants, heretofore treated alike, each attained a different status. There are, however, important objections to this argument. First, the Simons cannot adequately demonstrate that the White servant’s position was improving during and after the 1660’s; several acts of the Maryland and Virginia legislatures indicate otherwise. Another flaw in the Simons’ interpretation is their assumption that prior to the establishment of legal slavery there was no discrimination against Black people. It is true that before the 1660’s Black people were rarely called slaves. But this should not overshadow evidence from the 1630’s on that points to racial discrimination without using the term slavery. Such discrimination sometimes stopped short of lifetime servitude or inherited status--the two attributes of true slavery--yet in other cases it included both. (48) The Simons’ argument excludes the real possibility that Black people in the English colonies were never treated as the equals of White people.
This possibility has important ramifications. (49) If from the outset Black people were discriminated against, then legal slavery should be viewed as a reflection and an extension of racial prejudice rather than, as many historians including the Simons have argued, the cause of prejudice. In addition, the existence of discrimination before the advent of legal slavery offers a further explanation for the harsher treatment of Black slaves in North than in South America. (50) Frey and Terry have rightly argued that the lack of certain traditions in North America--such as a Roman conception of slavery and a Roman Catholic emphasis on equality--explains why the treatment of Black slaves was more severe there than in the Spanish and Portuguese colonies of South America. But this cannot be the whole explanation since it is merely negative, based only on a lack of something.