问题 问答题

案情:甲公司签发金额为1000万元、到期日为2006年5月30日、付款人为大满公司的汇票一张,向乙公司购买A楼房。甲乙双方同时约定:汇票承兑前,A楼房不过户。   其后,甲公司以A楼房作价1000万元、丙公司以现金1000万元出资共同设立丁有限公司。某会计师事务所将未过户的A楼房作为甲公司对丁公司的出资予以验资。丁公司成立后占有使用A楼房。   2005年9月,丙公司欲退出丁公司。经甲公司、丙公司协商达成协议:丙公司从丁公司取得退款1000万元后退出丁公司;但顾及公司的稳定性,丙公司仍为丁公司名义上的股东,其原持有丁公司50%的股份,名义上仍由丙公司持有40%,其余10%由丁公司总经理贾某持有,贾某暂付200万元给丙公司以获得上述10%的股权。丙公司依此协议获款后退出,据此,丁公司变更登记为:甲公司、丙公司、贾某分别持有50%、40%和10%的股权;注册资本仍为2000万元。   丙公司退出后,甲公司要求丁公司为其贷款提供担保,在丙公司代表未到会、贾某反对的情况下,丁公司股东会通过了该担保议案。丁公司遂为甲公司从B银行借款500万元提供了连带责任保证担保,同时,乙公司亦将其持有的上述1000万元汇票背书转让给陈某。陈某要求丁公司提供担保,丁公司在汇票上签注:"同意担保,但A楼房应过户到本公司。"陈某向大满公司提示承兑该汇票时,大满公司在汇票上批注:"承兑,到期丁公司不垮则付款。"   2006年6月5日,丁公司向法院申请破产获受理并被宣告破产。债权申报期间,陈某以汇票未获兑付为由、贾某以替丁公司代垫了200万元退股款为由向清算组申报债权,B银行也以丁公司应负担保责任为由申报债权并要求对A楼房行使优先受偿权。同时乙公司就A楼房向清算组申请行使取回权。   问题:

丙退出丁公司的做法是否合法?为什么?

答案

参考答案:不合法。丙公司的行为实为抽逃公司资金。

解析:《公司法》第36条明确规定,公司成立后,股东不得抽逃出资。本案中,丙公司从丁公司取得退款1000万元后退出丁公司。违反了上述规定。所以,丙公司的做法是不合法的。

填空题

Part 4


Questions 26-45


·Read the following passage and decide which answer best fits each space.
·For questions 26-45, mark one letter A, B, C or D on the Answer Sheet.
Participation (26) high school sports is not a constitutional right. (27) , it is a privilege, paid for by taxpayers, open to students who promise to (28) certain conduct requirements on and off the field. One of these promises is to (29) from using drugs. Drug use is a serious problem among high school students. Studies show that as many as 500, 000 high school students use muscle-pumping, life-destroying substances such as steroids. Many more use illegal drugs, (30) cause discipline problems and (31) the stage for lifelong (32) .
Drug testing works to (33) and identify use. That is why drug testing is required to compete in the Olympics, the National Collegiate Athletic Association and the National Football League. (34) drug testing was instituted by these organizations, use of performance- (35) drugs has been greatly reduced. We should want (36) in schools.
Indeed, many athletes (37) testing programs, and no wonder. Without testing, athletes have to choose between drug use and a competitive disadvantage (38) the field.
Those who challenge the need for drug testing may be forgetting (39) it is like be an adolescent. Peer pressure is enormous, and one of the few effective counter-weights is the fear of being caught. More importantly, once drug use is (40) , a school can (41) to the student before he or she gets addicted or arrested.
For 25 years, public schools (42) by federal judges and civil libertarians, with results everyone can see. It is time (43) decisions on how to run public schools locally (44) officials. There is nothing unconstitutional about asking those who gain the advantages of school-sponsored athletics to contribute to the safety of other players, the integrity of the game and their own well-being. The Supreme Court should leave these programs (45) .

A.addictions

B.conditions

C.addition

D.indulgence

单项选择题 案例分析题