问题 单项选择题

Questions 6-10An article published recently in the prestigious scientific journal Nature is shedding new light on an important, but hitherto little has been appreciated, aspect of human evolution. In this article, Professors Dennis Bramble and Daniel Lieberman suggest that the ability to run was a crucial factor in the development of our species. According to the two scientists, humans possess a number of anatomical features that make them surprisingly good runners. ’We are very confident that p selection for running-which came at the expense of the historical ability to live in trees-was instrumental in the origin of the modern human body form,’ says Bramble, a biology professor at the University of Utah.Traditional thinking up to now has been that the distinctive, upright body form of modern humans has come about as a result of the ability to walk, and that running is simply a by-product of walking. Furthermore, humans have usually been regarded as poor runners compared to such animals as dogs, horses or antelopes. However, this is only true if we consider fast running, or sprinting, over short distances. Even an Olympic athlete can hardly run as fast as a horse can gallop, and can only keep up a top speed for fifteen seconds or so. Horses, antelopes and greyhounds, on the other hand, can run at top speed for several minutes, clearly outperforming us in this respect. But when it comes to long-distance running, humans do astonishingly well. They can maintain a steady pace for miles, and their overall speed compares favourably with that of horses or dogs.Bramble and Lieberman examined twenty-six anatomical features found in humans. One of the most interesting of these is the nuchal ligament, a band of tissue that extends from a ridge on the base of the skull to the spine. When we run, it is this ligament that prevents our head from pitching back and forth or from side to side. Therefore, we are able to run with steady heads, held high. The nuchal ligament is not found in any other surviving primates, although the fossil record shows that Homo erectus, an early human species that walked upright, much as we do, also had one. Then there are our Achilles tendons at the backs of our legs, which connect our calf muscles to our heel bones-and which have nothing to do with walking. When we run, these tendons behave like springs, helping to propel us forward. Furthermore, we have low, wide shoulders, virtually disconnected from our skulls, another anatomical adaptation which allows us to run more efficiently. Add to this our light forearms, which swing out of phase with the movement of our legs to assist balance, and one begins to appreciate the point that Bramble and Lieberman are trying to make.But what evolutionary advantage is gained from being good long-distance runners One hypothesis is that this ability may have permitted early humans to obtain food more effectively. ’What these features and fossil facts appear to be telling us is that running evolved in order for our direct ancestors to compete with other carnivores for access to the protein needed to grow the big brains that we enjoy today,’ says Lieberman.

The passage suggests that _______.

A. we do not need calf muscles in order to walk

B.without shoulders we could not run very fast

C.the movement of our forearms is out of phase

D.our Achilles tendons are an adaptation for running

答案

参考答案:D

阅读理解与欣赏

阅读下面一段文言文,完成小题。(12分)

醉书斋记

郑日奎

于堂左洁一室,为书斋,明窗素壁,泊如也。设几二,一陈笔墨,一置香炉茗碗之属。竹床一,坐以之;木榻一,卧以之。书架书筒各四,古今籍在焉。琴磬尘尾诸什物,亦杂置左右。

甫晨起,即科头①。拂案上尘,注水砚中,研磨及丹铅,饱饮笔以俟。随意抽书一帙,据坐批阅之。顷至会心处,则朱墨淋漓渍纸上,字大半为之隐。有时或歌或叹,或笑或泣,或怒骂,或闷欲绝,或大叫称快,或咄咄诧异,或卧而思、起而狂走。家人瞷见者,悉骇愕,罔测所指。乃窃相议,俟稍定,始散去。

婢子送酒茗来,都不省取。或误触之,倾湿书册,辄怒而加责,后乃不复持至。逾时或犹未食,无敢前请者。惟内子时映帘窥余,得间始进,曰:“日午矣,可以饭乎?”余应诺。内子出,复忘之矣。羹炙皆寒,更温以俟者数四。及就食,仍挟一册与俱,且啖且阅,羹炙虽寒,或且变味,亦不觉也。至或误以双箸乱点所阅书,良久始悟非笔,而内子及婢辈罔不窃笑者。夜坐,漏常午,顾童侍,无人在侧,俄而鼾震左右,起视之,皆烂漫睡地上矣。

客或访余者,刺已入,值余方校书,不遽见。客伺久,辄大怒诟,或索取原刺,余亦不知也。盖余性既严急,家中人启事不以时,即叱出,而事之急缓不更问,以故仓卒不得白。而家中盐米诸琐务,皆内子主之,颇有序。余是以无所顾虑,而嗜益僻。

他日忽自悔,谋立誓戒之,商于内子,内子笑曰:“君无效刘伶断饮法②,只赚余酒脯,补五脏劳耶?吾亦惟坐视君沉湎耳,不能赞成君谋。”余惝然久之,因思余于书,洵不异伶于酒,正恐旋誓且旋畔;且为文字饮,不犹愈于红裙耶?遂笑应之曰:“如卿言,亦复佳。”乃不复立戒,而采其语意以名吾斋,曰“醉书”。        (选自《续古文观止》,有删改)

【注】①科头:不戴帽子。②刘伶新饮:刘伶或酒《管书•刘伶传》载,刘伶曾求其妻具酒肉立誓戒酒,誓后依然嗜酒如故。 

小题1:对下列句子中划线的词语的解释,不正确的一项是

A.婢子送酒茗来,都不取。省:知道。

B.起视之,皆烂漫睡地上矣。烂漫:坦率自然的样子。

C.余是以无所顾虑,而嗜益。僻:怪僻,

D.只余酒脯,补五脏劳耶赚:获取。小题2:下列各组句子中,划线的词的意义和用法都不相同的一组是 

A.研磨及丹铅,饱饮墨俟遂自投汨罗

B.而内子及婢辈罔不窃笑期年之后,虽欲言,无可进

C.余倘然久念悲其远也,亦哀

D.仍挟一册俱郦元之所见闻,殆余同小题3: 以下六句话,分别编为四组,全部能够表现作者“醉书”的一组是

①书架书筒各四,古今籍在焉 

②随意抽书一帙,据坐批阅之

③则朱墨淋漓渍纸上,字大半为之隐 

④他日忽自悔,谋立誓戒之 

⑤夜坐,漏常午,顾童侍,无人在侧 

⑥逾时或犹未食,无敢前请者 

A.①③④

B.③⑤⑥

C.①②⑤

D.②④⑥小题4:下列对原文内容的分析和概括,不正确的一项是

A.文章描绘了书斋主人为了读书常常置酒茶,饭食、睡眠和家人、宾客于脑后等痴醉的状态,展示了一个嗜书知命的书痴形象,表现了作者自得其乐、自我陶醉的心态。

B.作者性格严厉急躁,不谙世事,不近人情,读书入迷时,常对家人呵斥怒责,并拒绝会见来访的客人,因而经常得罪来访者,造成了紧张的人际关系。

C.作者夫人主持家务,井然有序,客观上“纵容”了丈夫的“醉书”习性:当作者对这种习性悔而思改时,她幽默地表示反对,可见她主观上对丈夫的“醉书”持赞赏态度。

D.作者本打算戒除“醉书”的习性,但又考虑到男人痴迷诗文总胜于沉溺女色等因素,最终采取顺其自然的态度,放弃了这种打算。

单项选择题