问题 问答题

[背景材料]
某大厦工程项目,建设单位与施工单位根据《建设工程施工合同文本》签订了工程的总承包施工合同,总承包商将该大厦工程项目的装饰装修工程分包给一家具有相应资质条件的某装饰装修工程公司。该装饰装修工程公司与该工程项目建设单位签订了该大厦工程项目的装饰装修施工合同。
该工程总承包施工单位在施工过程中发生了以下事件。
事件一:基坑开挖后用重型动力触探法检查,发现基坑下面存在古墓。
事件二:基坑验槽时,总承包施工单位技术负责人组织建设、设计、勘察、监理等单位的项目技术负责人共同检验,经检验基坑符合要求。
事件三:为了使水泥浆更具黏结力,旋喷桩在旋喷前3h、对水泥浆进行搅拌。
事件四:基坑回填过程中,施工总承包单位只检查了排水措施和回填土的含水量,并对其进行了控制。
[问题]

判断施工总承包单位在施工过程中发生的事件是否妥当,不妥当,请改正。

答案

参考答案:施工总承包单位在施工过程中发生的事件的妥当与否的制订如下。
(1)事件一不妥。
正确做法:基坑开挖后用钎探法或轻型动力触探法等检查基坑是否存在软弱土下卧层及空穴、古墓、古井、防空掩体、地下埋设物等及相应的位置、深度、形状。
(2)事件二不妥。
正确做法:基坑(槽)验收应由总监理工程师或建设单位项目负责人组织施工、设计、勘察等单位的项目和技术质量负责人共赴现场,按设计、规范和施工方案等要求进行检查,并做好基坑验槽记录和隐蔽工程记录。
(3)事件三不妥。
正确做法:水泥浆的搅拌宜在旋喷前1h内搅拌。
(4)事件四不妥。
正确做法:基坑回填土施工过程中,应检查排水措施、每层填筑厚度、回填上的含水量控制和压实程序等是否满足规定的要求。

单项选择题

D

Bad news sells. If it bleeds, it leads. No news is good news, and good news is no news. Those are the classic rules for the evening broadcasts and the morning papers. But now that information is being spread and monitored(监控) in different ways, researchers are discovering new rules. By tracking people’s e-mails and online posts, scientists have found that good news can spread faster and farther than disasters and sob stories.

“The ‘if it bleeds’ rule works for mass media,” says Jonah Berger, a scholar at the University of Pennsylvania. “They want your eyeballs and don’t care how you’re feeling. But when you share a story with your friends, you care a lot more how they react. You don’t want them to think of you as a Debbie Downer.”

Researchers analyzing word-of-mouth communication—e-mails, Web posts and reviews, face-to-face conversations—found that it tended to be more positive than negative(消极的), but that didn’t necessarily mean people preferred positive news. Was positive news shared more often simply because people experienced more good things than bad things? To test for that possibility, Dr. Berger looked at how people spread a particular set of news stories: thousands of articles on The New York Times’ website. He and a Penn colleague analyzed the “most e-mailed” list for six months. One of his first findings was that articles in the science section were much more likely to make the list than non-science articles. He found that science amazed Times’ readers and made them want to share this positive feeling with others.

Readers also tended to share articles that were exciting or funny, or that inspired negative feelings like anger or anxiety, but not articles that left them merely sad. They needed to be aroused(激发) one way or the other, and they preferred good news to bad. The more positive an article, the more likely it was to be shared, as Dr. Berger explains in his new book, “Contagious: Why Things Catch On.”

What do the classic rules mentioned in the text apply to?()

A. News reports.

B. Research papers.

C .Private e-mails.

D. Daily conversations.

单项选择题