问题 填空题

在Visual FoxPro中,假设表单上有一选项组:○男 ○女,该选项组的Value属性值赋为0。当其中的第一个选项按讯“男”被选中,该选项组的Value属性值为 【13】

答案

参考答案:A

解析: 选项组又称为选项按钮组,是包含选项按钮的一种容器。一个选项组中往往包含若干个选项按钮,但用户只能从中选择一个按钮。当用户单击某个选项按钮时,该按钮即成为被选中状态,而选项组中的其他选项按钮,不管原来是什么状态,都变为未选中状态。选项组的Value属性用于指定选项组中哪个选项按钮被选中。当初始值设为0时,表示在表单上的选项组中没有选中任何选项按钮,而选定第一个选项按钮后,该属性值就被赋值为1,如果选定第二个选项组按钮,则该属性值被赋值为2...依此类推。所以,本题的答案为1。

单项选择题
单项选择题

The sudden, dramatic explosion in value of online social media sites like Facebook and Twitter is reminiscent of the rise, about 15 years ago, of the online businesses that created the "dotcom bubble. " The Internet was far less widely used than it is today. Still, visionaries saw the potential for the Internet we have today, so virtual companies sprung up and grew like weeds as investors threw money their way. Some, like Google and Amazon, developed an enduring online presence and lasting financial value. But far too many quickly lost value when it became apparent that their rapid growth wasn’t yielding revenue.

So, how much is Facebook’s network of users really worth The potential is clear—when so many people are gathered in one virtual place, offering so much personal information about themselves, they create an unprecedented platform for targeted advertising. Or they would, if they were on the network to shop. When eBay and Amazon suggest products to their customers, they’re talking to people who’ve already proven that they’re interested in buying similar products. People go on Facebook for a variety of reasons-to catch up with old friends, share pictures, make new acquaintances, and talk, sometimes endlessly, about themselves. Whether they’ll appreciate having their virtual conversations interrupted by advertising, targeted or not, remains unclear.

It’s also unclear whether Facebook will actually be able to share information about its users’ browsing habits with advertisers. Complaints about the ineffectiveness of Facebook’s privacy policies have arisen in multiple countries, part of a larger social concern about how private information gets used on line. In December, the Federal Trade Commission issued a proposed framework that, among other things, would permit Facebook users to block advertisers from accessing information about their online interests. If that framework is implemented and widely used by Facebook subscribers, it could seriously impair the site’s value as a potential platform for targeted marketing.

What is clear is that Goldman Sachs has a significant interest in Facebook’s financial value, at least for the short term. Goldman Sachs’ decision to invest heavily in Facebook has had some interesting impacts. For one thing, the investment has allowed Facebook an opportunity to postpone issuing an IPO. That means that, at least for the moment, Facebook doesn’t yet have to disclose its finances or publicly address investor complaints.

Goldman Sachs’ investment also puts the firm in an ideal position to handle Facebook’s IPO when it eventually is issued, perhaps sometime next year. That, of course, has the potential to generate substantial revenues for Goldman Sachs’ clients. Google’s 2004 IPO raised an initial $1.2 billion for the company. After all the propaganda, Facebook’s IPO can hardly be expected to raise less. However, there remains a significant question as to whether Facebook’s potential for generating income is more virtual than real. If it turns out that Facebook can’t live up to its potential for generating advertising revenue, venture capitalists who invest for the long term may get burned.

One dilemma faced by social media like Facebook is that()

A. its customers often exchange private information on it

B. advertisers often interrupt its customers’ conversations

C. the FTC threatens to limit its service with new regulations

D.the users’ private information is misused by advertisers