问题 多项选择题

某省电力总公司一处长,在征得公司总经理等人的批准后,承包了电力总公司一下属实体企业。当时,该企业效益并不好,且根据当时的规定,该处长将取得该企业纯利润的30%。后来该企业效益越来越好,该处长为表示感谢以私人名义送给总经理杨某50万元。市检察院因此对杨某以受贿罪提起公诉,并于1998年4月18日将杨某刑事拘留,4月24日对其作出正式逮捕的决定。在对该案件进行审理时,人民法院以证据不足,不构成受贿罪,于1999年6月10日宣判杨某无罪。市检察院提起抗诉后,二审法院判决维持一审法院判决,于6月20日将杨某释放。对于此案,下列观点正确的是:()

A.应当对杨某国家赔偿。损失应当从1998年4月24日起计算到1999年6月20日

B.应当对杨某国家赔偿。损失应当从1998年4月18日起计算到1999年6月20日

C.此案的赔偿义务机关为市检察院和一审人民法院

D.本案的赔偿义务机关应当是市检察院

答案

参考答案:B, D

解析:

考点:国家赔偿义务机关及期限计算 

讲解:本案中作出错误拘留决定和作出错误逮捕批捕决定的都是市检察院。《国家赔偿法》第19条规定:“行使国家侦查、检察、审判、监狱管理职权的机关及其工作人员在行使职权时侵犯公民、法人和其他组织的合法权益造成损害的,该机关为赔偿义务机关。对没有犯罪事实或者没有事实证明有犯罪重大嫌疑的人错误拘留的,作出拘留决定的机关为赔偿义务机关。对没有犯罪事实的人错误逮捕的,作出逮捕决定的机关为赔偿义务机关。再审改判无罪的,作出原生效判决的人民法院为赔偿义务机关。二审改判无罪的,作出一审判决的人民法院和作出逮捕决定的机关为共同赔偿义务机关。” 

本案的赔偿义务机关为作出错误拘留和逮捕决定的市检察院,赔偿损失的期间应从刑事拘留日即1998年4月18日起算,至1999年6月30日杨某释放时止。人民法院因为没有错误审判而不会成为本案的国家赔偿义务机关。

单项选择题
单项选择题

Although "naming rights" have proliferated in American higher education for the past several decades, the phenomenon has recently expanded to extraordinary lengths. Anything to get an extra dollar out of donors is fair game. I know colleges and universities sorely need to raise funds in these times of fiscal constraints, but things have gotten a bit out of hand.
Universities and colleges have long been named after donors-think of Harvard, Yale, Brown, and many others. John Harvard would hardly get a bench named after him today, given the modesty of his gift of books for the library back in the seventeenth century. Now it takes much more to get one’s name on a college. One institution, Rowan University of New Jersey, changed its name (from Glassboro State College) not long ago when a large donation was made. Buildings, too, have been affected. Traditionally, they were named after people such as distinguished scholars or visionary academic leaders; now they’re often named after big donors.
Why is all of this happening now The main motivation for the naming frenzy is, of course, to raise money. Donors love to see their names, or the names of their parents or other relatives, on buildings, schools, institutions, professorships, and the like. Increasingly, corporations and other businesses also seek to benefit from having their names on educational facilities. Today, no limits seem to exist on what can be named. If something does not have a name, it is up for grabs—a staircase, a pond, or a parking garage. Once all the major facilities have titles, lesser things go on the naming auction block. Colleges and universities, public and private, are all under increased pressure to raise money, and naming brings in cash.
It is unproductive. Separate branding weakens the focus and mission of an institution and perhaps even its broader reputation. It confuses the public, including potential students, and feeds the idea that the twenty-first-century university is simply a confederation of independent entrepreneurial domains.
The trends we see now in the United States, and perhaps tomorrow in other countries, will inevitably weaken the concept of the university as an institution that is devoted to the search for truth and the transmission of knowledge. All this naming distracts from the mission of an institution that has almost a millennium of history and cheapens its image. It is a sad symbol indeed of the commercialization and entrepreneurialism of the contemporary university.

According to the author, a university should be a place ______.

A.devoted to the search for truth

B.commercialized by naming trends

C.attracting potential students

D.focusing on scientific research only