问题 填空题

Questions 19-25


·Read the following article from a magazine and answer questions 19-25.
·For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B, C or D.
·Mark your answer on the Answer Sheet.

The Big Easy on the Brink


A Category 5 hurricane would come barreling out of the Gulf of Mexico, It would cause Lake Pontchartrain, north of New Orleans, to overflow, pouring down millions of gallons of water on the city. Then things would really get ugly. Evacuation routes would be blocked. Buildings would collapse. Chemicals and hazardous waste would dissolve, turning the floodwaters into a lethal soup. In the end, what was left of the city might not be worth saving. "There’s concern it would essentially destroy New Orleans," says Suhayda, a water-resources expert at Louisiana State University.
New Orleans has always had a complicated relationship with the water surrounding it. Everyone told the first settlers this was the wrong place to build a city. It is wedged precariously between the mighty Mississippi and Lake Pontchartrain, and most of it was once swampland. Aggravating the problem is the fact that much of New Orleans is below sea level, so that after a good rain, the water just settles in. There is now a decent pumping system, which helps. Old-timers, however, still talk of the days when, after a bad storm, bodies were washed out of the cemeteries.
What is threatening New Orleans is a combination of two man-made problems: more levees and fewer wetlands. The levees installed along the Mississippi to protect the city from water surges have had an annoying effect: they have actually make it more vulnerable to flooding. That’s because New Orleans has been kept in place by the precarious balance of two opposing forces. Because the city is constructed on 100 feet of soft silt, sand and clay, it naturally "subsides", or sinks, several feet a century. Historically, that subsidence has been counteracted by sedimentation: new silt, sand and clay that are deposited when the river floods. But since the levees went up-mostly after the great flood of 1927—the river has not been flooding and sedimentation has stopped.
New Orleans’ other major man-made problem is that its wetlands and its low-lying barrier islands are disappearing. The Louisiana coast is losingl6,000 acres of wetland each year, mostly as a result of population expansion into once pristine areas, destructive oil and gas drilling, pollution and land loss through lack of sedimentation. As it turns out, wetland, and barrier islands aren’t just nice to look at; they are also a key natural barrier to hurricanes. (Every 2.7miles of wetland absorbs a foot of storm surge.) As the wetlands go, the chance of a hurricane blowing the city away grows.
So far, little has been done to save the city. However, while the grimmest of the doomsayers warn that New Orleans could be next Atlantis, some laid-back residents are saying that it could just as easily become the next Venice and that after the flood, the good times won’t roll—they’ll float.

New Orleans was not a good place to build a city because ______.

A.it was far away from other big cities

B.it was surrounded with giant rivers

C.it was ugly looking

D.most of it was wetland

答案

参考答案:D

解析: 本题是细节题。第2段提到,每个人都告诉第一代的建城者这不是一个建城的好位置,新奥尔良坐落于密西西比河和庞恰特雷恩湖之间,大部分的面积曾经都是沼泽地。因此,选择D,它大部分的面积都是湿地,本中第2段提到新奥尔良及其周围的水系关系复杂,并不是被河流包围,所以选项B“被巨大的河流包围”不准确。

阅读理解与欣赏

阅读下面语段,完成文后各题。

该不该复建圆明园?(专访)

(一)访全国政协委员、中国社科院研究员 叶廷芳

记者:您一直反对复建圆明园。针对圆明园最近将修复部分建筑一事,您向《人民日报》投书,表示“感到很愤怒!”为什么?

叶廷芳:圆明园是中 * * 的国耻纪念地,是烙在每个有良知的炎黄子孙脊梁上的痛苦标记。我们留住她,就是留住入侵强盗的“作案现场”,让她成为对帝国主义侵略者的永远的无声控诉!文物是什么?文物是不可再生的历史文化或文明遗产,它的意义在于历史见证价值。对于中国人民来说,圆明园废墟不啻是一口永久的警钟;对于全人类,包括肇事国的子孙们也是不可或缺的教科书,可以使他们懂得:毁坏别国人民的智慧结晶,是要被钉在历史的耻辱柱上的。

记者:您总说“废墟也是一种美!”尽管有人不以为然,但我发现您始终坚持这个观点。

叶廷芳:这牵涉到对文物的体认。文物的贵重品格在于它的历史的原初性和真实性,任何凭主观愿望的增添或改动都意味着破坏。圆明园遗址残存的东西固然不多,但这是历史,是她被劫后的真实状况。再说,遗址的文物性质和价值,不是依据她残留物质的多寡而决定的,而主要看她的历史见证价值。从某种意义上说,像圆明园这样的遗址,拥有的残留物越少,无声的控诉效应越悲怆、越强烈!废墟之美,其美的奥蕴就在这里。鲁迅说过,悲剧是将有价值的东西毁灭了给人看。如今,被当年国际侵略势力毁掉的“万园之园”留下的这片废墟就是一种巨大的、震撼人心的悲剧美!有人说:那么大片的地皮荒在那里,岂不可惜?非也!正是因为她“大”并且“荒”,才这样震撼人心。

记者:有人认为部分复建并不影响圆明园的遗址性质。您的看法如何?

叶廷芳:2000年北京市出台的《圆明园遗址公园规划》正确地确定了公园的“遗址”性质。但同时又不无矛盾地规定在遗址上复建十分之一的规划。十分之一在比例上固然是小数,但绝对数将是大量的,这样一来,岂不使苍凉静穆的圆明园遗址变得不伦不类!至于在原址上复建的问题,鉴于目前争论还很大,“不妨先冷一冷,放一放”。

(二)访建筑学家汪之力

记者:学界有人提出,应直面圆明园废墟,您对此怎么看?

汪之力:关于要保留废墟的说法,我听到了许多言论,比如“废墟对人民有更大的教育意义”,“对废墟的触动就是对历史的亵渎和背叛”,“让废墟静静地躺在那里”,“废墟也是一种美”……单纯看这些观点,容易引起人们的同情,但这都脱离了圆明园遗址的实际。圆明园遗址的实际情况是,清朝以后,相当长的一段时间都在被毁坏当中,根本没有静静地躺在那里的机会。建筑界早年间之所以发出倡议,成立中国圆明园学会,就是因为当时有关部门在讨论是否要在圆明园遗址修建一座旅馆的方案。一些农民为了发展生产挖山填湖。一些学者多次提出国外原样保存遗址的实例,但国外有许多复杂的情况,必须视具体情况而定。外国也多有修复遗址的先例,比如波兰古城就在二战后得到恢复。当然也存在一些保存废墟的情况,比如古罗马大斗兽场,但圆明园是一座占地350多公顷的大型园林,有它的特点。而且,我们提出的是修复圆明园,重建一部分建筑,恢复它的山水,而非再造一座圆明园。

记者:为什么要恢复圆明园的山形水系、植物配置和一部分建筑物,怎样看待修复与保护生态的关系?

汪之力:恢复山形水系有两大意义。其一,圆明园原有的山水风景太经典了。它是我国现存规模最大的皇家园林遗址,体现了中国园林建筑“天人合一”的根本思想。圆明园集大自然的美好景色于方寸之间,在世界园林艺术上有突出地位。其二,山水是圆明园比较容易修复的部分。侵略者只能烧毁建筑而无法破坏山水布局,圆明园虽然曾被挖山填湖,但比较容易复原。按规划,经过园林专家的研究设计,进一步调整树种,扩大水面,整修山形,可以使遗址的生态更丰富,更提高,不会破坏生态。

记者:能否设想一下,如果按照规划修复圆明园,它将具备哪些功能?反之,会怎样?汪之力:如果按照科学规划、专家参与的原则,本着保护、整修与利用相结合的原则修复圆明园,圆明园的可以成为“保护世界文化纪念馆”、故宫第二个展览中心等。这样,圆明园遗址将成为有丰富内容的保护世界文化特殊的纪念地。反之,坚持保持废墟面目(即在园内不修建任何建筑物,不整理原有的山形水系和植物配置),我担心圆明园将沦为又一个娱乐休闲场所。(节选自《光明日报》)

1.下列对本文的理解和分析,不正确的一项是

A.叶廷芳认为,圆明园废墟是无价的文物,重修无异于破坏圆明园的文物价值。

B.叶廷芳认为,北京市出台的《圆明园遗址公园规划》规定复建的比例太大,因此暂时不能考虑圆明园修建问题。

C.汪之力认为,恢复圆明园的山形水系、植物配置,部分复建圆明园建筑物,更加有利于圆明园的保护和利用。

D.汪之力认为,圆明园有不同于国外废墟的地方,一味坚持保留圆明园的废墟,其实无异于对圆明园的破坏。2.叶廷芳反对修复圆明园的主要理由有哪些?请分条概述。

3.在是否修复圆明园的问题上,汪之力的观点和叶廷芳针锋相对,但其实也包含着一些共同的理由,请简述其共同之处。

填空题