问题 阅读理解

American and British researchers have proved that judgments based on how someone looks are important. They found that appearance tells a lot about your personality.

The researchers included Laura Naumann of Sonoma State University in California, and Simine Vazire of Washington University in Saint Louis, Missouri. They were joined by Sam Gosling of the University of Texas at Austin and Peter J. Rentfrow of Britain's Cambridge University. The results of their study were published in the Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin in December, 2009.

The subjects(接受实验者)were asked to judge the personality of people they had never met. The judges examined pictures of one hundred twenty-three people. The people in the photographs had been told how to stand. They looked into the cameras without showing their feelings. The same people also were photographed the way they themselves wanted to stand. Those who wanted to smile could smile.

Then the judges attempted to decide what the people were like. The researchers compared the judges’ opinions with the way the people who were photographed thought of themselves. Three people who knew those in the photographs well also provided information about their personality and behavior.

The judges looked for ten qualities in the people in the pictures. The qualities included extroversion (having a confident character and enjoying the company of other people) and self-esteem (being satisfied with oneself).

The judges also looked for signs of loneliness, conscientiousness(正义), emotional control and religious and political beliefs.

The researchers said the judges could identify some personalities even when people were pictured in controlled positions. They could recognize personalities like extroversion and self-esteem. But it was hard for the judges to decide about most other personalities under the controlled conditions.

When the people smiled and stood naturally, however, judging their personalities was easy. Then the judges’ choices were correct for nine of the ten personalities.

Researcher Laura Nauman said that we live in the world where first impressions are important.

1. According to the passage, who were the judges?

A. The researchers of the study.                       B. The subjects in the study.

C. Parents and other adults.                               D. People in the photographs.

2. Which of the following qualities could the judges identify even when people were pictured in controlled positions?

A. Extroversion                   B. Religious beliefs              C. Loneliness         D. Emotional control

3. We can infer from the passage that ____________

A. the study was carried out by four researchers from America.

B. in the study126 people were photographed for judges to decide their personalities.

C. the Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin is an official publication(出版物).

D. it was hard to recognize personalities when the people were pictured with natural looks.

4. What will the author most probably talk about next?

A. The quality of the judges.                      B. The personalities of Laura Nauman.

C. Signs of emotional control.                   D. The reason why one’s appearance is important.

答案

小题1:B

小题2:A

小题3:C

小题4:D

综合题

(16分)阅读下列材料,回答问题。

材料一 中国古代的“选举”与源自西方的、现在流行的“选举”虽然中文字面相同,在实质内容方面无疑是有着根本性的差别的。

——摘自[英]戴维·米勒等《布来克维尔政治学百科全书》

材料二 中国进入近代以前,人们心目中所指的“选举”又与现在人们心目中所指的“选举”不同,它不是指人们投票选举代表、议员或者自基层到最高层的各级领袖,而完全是指另外的、今人已经相当陌生却正是我们现在要叙述的东西。而由此一个古代概念的完全更新,也正好可以从一个侧面见出天翻地覆的百年巨变。

——摘自何怀宏《选举社会及其终结—秦汉至晚清历史的一种社会阐释》

材料三 美国建立宪政民主制度,经历了……共180多年,才真正实现公民普选权不受种族、性别、财产、年龄限制。英国经历的时间更长一些,从建立君主立宪政体到取消选举权的男女不平等经历了240年。……中国从第一部宪法颁布就规定,除依照法律剥夺政治权利的人之外,我国“年满18岁的公民,不分民族、种族、性别、职业、家庭出身、宗教信仰、教育程度、财产状况、居住期限,都有选举权和被选举权。

——摘自陈红太《中国民主政治建设的基本共识和民主现代化的实现》

请回答:

(1)“源自西方”的“选举”制度主要是指什么?根据材料一并结合所学知识,指出中国古代的“选举”与源自西方的、现在流行的“选举”之间的根本性的差别。(3分)

(2)根据材料二,指出“现在人们心目中所指的‘选举’”是指什么制度?西方这一制度与起源阶段的西方“选举”有什么不同?结合所学知识,分析中国近代百年历史中在“选举”制度上是怎样“完全更新”的?(7分)

(3)根据材料三,比较美国、英国的宪政民主制度中的选举制度与中国1954年《宪法》中的选举制度的主要异同。(3分)

(4)根据所学知识,概括社会主义现代化建设新时期,中国民主政治建设所取得的主要成就(3分)

单项选择题