问题 问答题

东方公司常年大批量生产甲、乙两种产品。产品生产过程划分为两个步骤,相应设置两个车间。第一车间为第二车间提供半成品,经第二车间加工最终形成产成品。甲、乙两种产品耗用主要材料相同,且在生产开始时一次投入(8月份甲产品直接领用了5000元,乙产品直接领用了6000元)。所耗辅助材料直接计入制造费用。

东方公司采用综合结转分步法计算产品成本。实际发生生产费用在各种产品之间的分配方法是:材料费用按定额材料费用比例分配;生产工人薪酬、制造费用(含分配转入的辅助生产成本)按实际生产工时分配。月末完工产品与在产品之间生产费用的分配方法是定额成本法。东方公司8月份有关成本计算资料如下:

(1)甲、乙两种产品8月份投入定额材料(单位:元)

(2)8月份第一车间、第二车间实际发生的原材料费用(不含甲乙产品直接领用的材料费用)、生产工时数量以及生产工人薪酬、制造费用(不含分配转入的辅助生产成本)如下:

(3)企业有锅炉和供电两个辅助生产车间,8月份这两个车间的辅助生产明细账所归集的费用分别是:供电车间88500元,锅炉车间19900元,供电车间为生产车间和企业管理部门提供360000度电,其中,第一车间220000度,第二车间130000度,管理部门4000度,锅炉车间6000度;锅炉车间为生产车间和企业管理部门提供40000吨热力蒸汽,其中,第一车间2000吨,第二车间1000吨,管理部门36800吨,供电车间200吨。

要求:

假设企业采用的是交互分配法分配辅助生产成本,将第一车间和第二车间8月份分配的辅助生产成本在甲、乙两种产品之间分配。

答案

参考答案:

第一车间: 甲产品分配的辅助生产成本=55211.2×(1600/2400)=36807.47(元)

乙产品分配的辅助生产成本=55211.2×(800/2400)=18403.73(元)

第二车间: 甲产品分配的辅助生产成本=32527.6×(4200/7000)=19516.56(元)

乙产品分配的辅助生产成本=32527.6×(2800/7000)=13011.04(元)

单项选择题

Weak dollar or no, $ 46,000-the price for a single year of undergraduate instruction amid the red brick of Harvard Yard-is (1) But nowadays cost is (2) barrier to entry at many of America’s best universities. Formidable financial-assistance policies have (3) fees or slashed them deeply for needy students. And last month Harvard announced a new plan designed to (4) the sticker-shock for undergraduates from middle and even upper-income families too.

Since then, other rich American universities have unveiled (5) initiatives. Yale, Harvard’s bitterest (6) , revealed its plans on January 14th. Students whose families make (7) than $60,000 a year will pay nothing at all. Families earning up to $ 200,000 a year will have to pay an average of 10% of their incomes. The university will (8) its financial- assistance budget by 43%, to over $ 80m.

Harvard will have a similar arrangement for families making up to $180,000. That makes the price of going to Harvard or Yale (9) to attending a state-run university for middle-and upper-income students. The universities will also not require any student to take out (10) to pay for their (11) , a policy introduced by Princeton in 2001 and by the University of Pennsylvania just after Harvard’s (12) . No applicant who gains admission, officials say, should feel (13) to go elsewhere because he or she can’t afford the fees.

None of that is quite as altruistic as it sounds. Harvard and Yale are, after all, now likely to lure more students away from previously (14) options, particularly state-run universities, (15) their already impressive admissions figures and reputations.

The schemes also provide a (16) for structuring university fees in which high prices for rich students help offset modest prices for poorer ones and families are less (17) on federal grants and government-backed loans.

Less wealthy private colleges whose fees are high will not be able to (18) Harvard or Yale easily. But America’s state-run universities, which have traditionally kept their fees low and stable, might well try a differentiated (19) scheme as they raise cash to compete academically with their private (20) . Indeed, the University of California system has already started to implement a sliding-fee scale.

11()

A.charge

B.fare

C.payment

D.tuition

多项选择题