There were times it was only schoolchildren who felt sick before they got their grades. But now teachers in Germany are scared, too, as they are being graded by their students.
Many teachers are opposed to it. They don’t mind being evaluated(评价). But they are upset because the results are then being posted on the Internet and accessible to millions of Internet users. On the website www.spickmich.deduring the past four months students have posted evaluation of 100,000 teachers.
The teachers are graded on categories such as “motivated”, “good instruction”, “easy examinations”, or even “sexy”. Many teachers think that their privacy has been violated.
The creators of the website say that the students are only being offered the chance to provide teachers with some feedback about their classroom instruction. Bernd Dicks, who founded the website with three friends, says that the students are largely quite satisfied with their teachers. On a grading scale of one to six, the teachers’ average grade is 2.7 and it has been improving lately. He often says the impression is that students are bullying（威吓） their teachers. But there is also bullying of the students by teachers.
“Teachers must also learn to live with criticism,” he added. But still, the website is not totally immune from manipulation(操纵), as one teacher near the northern city of Hanover recently proved. He registered himself on the website as a student and then rated his own teaching colleagues highly. Within a few days, seven of his colleagues were listed in the top 10 ranking of Germany’s best teachers.
小题1:Many teachers are opposed to the website because_____.
A．their privacy has been violated
B．they are afraid of being assessed
C．their evaluations are unfair
D．the results are not satisfying小题2:We can infer that the founder of the website intended to _____.
A．get the students to know their teachers better
B．conduct a survey on teachers’ performance
C．help the teachers to improve their teaching
D．change the teachers’ ways of giving instructions小题3:From what the teacher in Hanover did, we can infer _____.
A．he intended to help his colleague
B．there was some disadvantage of the website
C．his colleagues were more popular than him
D．he wanted to know how he was evaluated
小题1:A
小题2:C
小题3:B
题目分析：本文就德国的老师被学生评价然后结果被公布在网站上一事，本文就这个问题列出它的优点及缺点，这样做引起了老师的不满，他们不是不愿让学生评价，而是不愿让结果公布在网上。这就引起了有这样一个老师以学生的名誉给自己及其他老师评出最好的成绩，因而对网站不能制止这种行为而提出不满。
小题1:这是细节理解题。根据Many teachers think that their privacy has been violated.故选A。
小题2:这是推理判断题。根据On a grading scale of one to six, the teachers’ average grade is 2.7 and it has been improving lately.老师的被评估的平均分提高了，说明有助于老师们改进教学，故选C。
小题3:这是推理判断题。根据He registered himself on the website as a student and then rated his own teaching colleagues highly. Within a few days, seven of his colleagues were listed in the top 10 ranking of Germany’s best teachers.
网站不能确认对老师的评价真的来自学生，故选B。
点评：推理判断就是根据作者的意图和倾向来完成相关的问题。 根据你对文章的理解，来判断各个选项的正误。最重要的就是读懂句子的意思，找出文章的中心，这种阅读是深层阅读，但是你最重要的就是找出文章的中心意思，抓住主要句子和相关句子的意思就可以解决了，要注意题目中的一些关键词和文章中的句子的对比，尤其是一些转折词、连词等等。