问题 单项选择题

By 2010 the European Commission predicts transcontinental freight traffic will have risen 50 percent as a result of European expansion, and much of that will have to cross the enormous obstacle of the Alps. Right now the only practical way for most heavy traffic to get through is by truck and tunnel. And while that could change if safer and cleaner rail lines were opened, the chances are that won’t happen anytime soon.

Several private trucking companies have adapted quickly and creatively to the demands of European unification. Some of the bigger truckers trace cargoes with the Global Positioning System and sophisticated computers. And if trucks also bring more road hazards and pollution, at present there is no alternative. Right now only 8 percent of European merchandise moves by rail, compared with more than 40 percent in the United States. Delays are so common that the average speed for freight is about 18km an hour.

The railways have had trouble outgrowing a heritage of national rivalries and open warfare between Europe’s countries. The result is what another European Commission report calls "a mosaic of badly interconnected national systems. " Language barriers remain a problem, requiring crew changes at some borders. Switching systems and signals differ.

And efficiency is more of a dream than a goal. Europe’s railroads still have to deal with "phantom trains" that run so late that they combine with others and disappear from the railroad’s records. In an era when many companies depend on a "just-in-time" inventories to make a profit, railroads are rarely on time at all.

Yet there is little official enthusiasm for changing the system. The reality is that governments have helped create the imbalance between road and rail in Europe—and government action will likely be needed to fix it. The French emphasis on using rail to move people instead of goods, for instance, has helped cripple freight service. "All the investments went to passenger traffic," says Denis Douté, director of freight services for the French rail company SNCF. Freight trains have had to find "windows" to run in between passenger trains, unlike those in the United States, which often travel on separate tracks. The further development of the freight network requires massive investments to modernize existing infrastructure and open new ones. However, the political will to fund that kind of investment is lacking, which means the citizens will have to hold their noses for a while longer.

The author’s purpose of writing this passage is to ().

A. stimulate the public and the environmental groups to concern about the freight traffic

B. alert the European Commission to the consequence of the blind expansion

C. elaborate the freight traffic problems and their causes in Europe

D. appeal to the governments to invest more money in freight traffic

答案

参考答案:D

解析:

作者意图题。作者意图一般都会在第一段或最后一段表现出来。本篇文章谈论的内容是选项C“欧洲货运交通的问题及原因”,作者的意图在最后一段第一句和倒数第二句清楚地表现出来,即呼吁政府对货运交通多投资,故正确答案是D。

填空题
问答题

下面是一组毛 * * 关于社会主义社会矛盾学说的材料:材料1 在社会主义社会中,基本的矛盾仍然是生产关系和生产力之间的矛盾,上层建筑和经济基础之间的矛盾。不过社会主义社会的这些矛盾,同旧社会的生产关系和生产力的矛盾、上层建筑和经济基础的矛盾,具有根本不同的性质和情况罢了。资本主义社会的矛盾表现为剧烈的对抗和冲突,表现为剧烈的阶级斗争,那种矛盾不可能由资本主义制度本身来解决,而只有社会主义革命才能够加以解决。社会主义矛盾是另一回事,恰恰相反,它不是对抗性的矛盾,它可以经过社会主义制度本身不断得到解决。 摘自毛 * * :《关于正确处理人民内部矛盾的问题》。 (1957年2月27日)材料2 在我们的面前有两类社会矛盾,这就是敌我之间的矛盾和人民内部的矛盾。这是性质完全不同的两类矛盾。……敌我之间的矛盾是对抗性的矛盾。人民的内部的矛盾,在劳动人民之间说来,是非对抗性的;在被剥削阶级和剥削阶级之间说来,除了对抗性的一面以外,还有非对抗 性的一面。……一般说来,人民内部的矛盾,是在人民利益根本一致的基础上的矛盾。……敌我之间和人民内部这两类矛盾的性质不同,解决的方法也不同。简单地说起来,前者是分清敌我的问题,后者是分清是非的问题。……我们的专政,叫做工人阶级领导的以工农联盟为基础的人民民主专政。这就表明,在人民内部实行民主制度,而由工人阶级团结全体有公民权的人民,首先是农民,向着反动阶级、反动派和反抗社会主义改造和社会主义建设的分子实行专政。 摘自毛 * * :《关于正确处理人民内部矛盾的问题》 (1957年2月27日) 请回答: (1)根据材料1,并结合所学的知识,请说明社会主义社会的基本矛盾和发展动力是什么 (2)根据材料2,并结合所学的知识,请说明社会主义社会两类不同性质的社会矛盾及解决办法是什么