问题 多项选择题

王某和林某是生意上的死对头,由于林某从中作梗致使王某损失近百万元。王某对此十分恼火,遂出资5万元雇佣张某去除掉林某。张某答应了此事,回到家后将欲杀林某的情况告诉其妻陈某,陈某不仅不加制止,而a积极为其出谋划策,帮张某买来一把尖刀用于杀林某。在陈某的帮助下,张某作了充分准备,于某晚潜人林某的家中,当时林某不在家。张某见林某妻子正在床上睡觉,顿起歹意,就把其强 * * 了。等到林某同家,又将林某杀死。
请根据上述案情,回答以下问题:

2000年12月,李某事先伪造A公司向其借款人民币100万元的借条,并趁A公司工作人员不备偷盖下该公司的公章。2003年9月6日,李某给A公司法定代表人苏某发传真,要求苏某将借款人民币100万元及利息人民币30万元支付到其指定的银行账户。同日下年李某将伪造的借条传真给A公司。2003年9月9日,李某以书面传真方式指使庄某作伪证,要求庄某在法院调查时谎称曾借给李某人民币100万元用于放贷收取利息。同日,李某将借条、自述材料、身份证复印件等材料交给律师寸:某,并委托于某对A公司提起民事诉讼。次日,苏某向公安机关报案,李某因被公安机关调查而未提起诉讼。则李某的行为不构成以下哪些犯罪( )

A.诈骗罪(未遂)

B.诈骗罪(预备)

C.妨害作证罪(未遂)

D.妨害作证罪(既遂)

答案

参考答案:A,B,C

解析:[考点] 诈骗罪;妨害作证罪;犯罪停止形态 首先,诈骗罪是指以非法占有为目的,用虚构事实或隐瞒真相的方法,骗取数额较大的公私财物的行为。而本案中,李某的目的是希望通过伪造借款合同,指使他人作伪证来欺骗审判机关使审判机关产生错误认识从而达到通过诉讼非法获取他人财物的目的,并不是想通过伪造借款合同而使受害人产生错误认识从而达到非法占有财物的目的。 《最高人民检察院法律政策研究室关于通过伪造证据骗取法院民事裁判占有他人财物的行为如何适用法律问题的答复》也规定:“以非法占有为目的,通过伪造证据骗取法院民事裁判占有他人财物的行为,所侵害的主要是人民法院正常的审判活动,可以由人民法院依照民事诉讼法的有关规定作出处理,不宜以诈骗罪追究行为人的刑事责任……—如果行为人有指使他人作伪证行为,构成犯罪的,应当依照刑法第三百零七条第一款的规定,以妨害作证罪追究刑事责任。”因此,对本案被告人的行为不宜以诈骗罪定性。其次,妨害作证罪,是指采用暴力、威胁、贿买等方法阻止证人作证或者指使他人作伪证的行为。妨害作证罪是举动犯,只要实施了妨害作证的行为,即构成犯罪既遂。本案中,李某伪造了借款合同并乘被害人管理上的漏洞加盖 A公司的公章,又指使庄某作伪证,同时又正式委托了诉讼代理人。尽管尚未正式向法院提起诉讼,但其伪造证据,指使他人作伪证的行为均已实施完毕,已经侵害了国家司法机关的正常诉讼活动和公民依法作证的权利。故被告人的行为是犯罪既遂。因此答案为ABC。

阅读理解

Observer 2007-03-28 13:54

Nothing could be more shameful for McDonald’s and KFC. They are violating labour’s rights. The government must immediately bring the guilty to justice. A stricter government inspection system must be enforced to protect the workers.

Nathan 2007-03-28 21:39

It is known that McDonald’s and KFC and other fast-food restaurants pay the lowest wage they possibly can to get their employees. I think it’s kind of funny that these two restaurants have not yet set up unions. It is also known that they also take every possible measure e(legal, and sometimes illegal) to prevent their employees from forming or joining unions. I think it is high time that government enforced the law that they have made.

Cushman 2007-03-28 22:32

The deepest reason is that China has a large population. If you complain that the pay is very low, the boss will tell you that can go to other places and that there are a lot of people waiting for the job. Today finding a job is not very easy, so you don’t have many choices, and you have to face the reality.

Chip 2007-03-29 20:33

If wages were too low, people wouldn’t work for them, but they do, so it proves the wages are reasonable. Sure, they could raise the wages, but why should they? The workers are still working, still willing to show up on time, and it keeps costs lower. Were they to raise wages, they would have to FIRE more workers, and the price of burgers would go up. Then people wouldn’t buy them, then McDonald’s would once again FIRE more workers because of a reduced demand, and you’d be back in the same boat, just with less people working.

小题1:What are they debating about?

A.McDonald’s and KFC pay too low a salary to their employees.

B.Setting up a social security system.

C.Fast-food restaurants have no rights to fire workers.

D.McDonald’s and KFC will be punished for their behaviour.小题2:According to Chip, it is____for McDonald’s and KFC to give employees a low salary.

A.unacceptable

B.shameful

C.acceptable

D.illegal小题3: In the opinion of Cushman, the key to the problem is that____.

A.the social security net has not been set up

B.China has too large a population

C.the government has not taken stronger steps to protect workers

D.the unions have not played an important part to raise the wages.小题4: The underlined word “they” in Nathan’s words refers to____.

A.the employees

B.governments

C.all the restaurants

D.fast-food restaurants

判断题